Bobbink Paul, Larkin Philip, Probst Sebastian
HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland, Geneva School of Health Sciences. Geneva, Switzerland.
University Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Apr 10;6:100199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100199. eCollection 2024 Jun.
The benefits of nurse-led therapeutic patient education regarding wound healing and the prevention of recurrences for individuals living with a venous leg ulcer remain unclear. Obtaining the individuals perspective could offer an in depth understanding of why and how they engage or not, in self-management strategies following nurse-led patient education. Despite strong evidence indicating the need for further investigation into the benefits of therapeutic patient education in this population there is a lack of research into how individuals cope with chronic venous insufficiency or resulting ulceration. With this discussion paper we therefore explore the challenges associated with employing a Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology to gain a deeper insight into the experiences of patients with venous leg ulcers receiving individualized nurse-led patient education programs focused on the self-management of their condition.
To identify and analyse the specific methodological and practical challenges encountered when applying a Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology to gain a better understanding of how patients with venous leg ulcer experience an individualised nurse-led patient education programme concerning the self-management of their condition.
discussion paper.
The constructivist approach to Grounded Theory methodology allows for the investigation of understudied phenomena such as nurse-led patient education for individuals living with venous leg ulcers. This methodology values the co-construction of a theory taking into consideration the inherent value of participants' and researchers' experiences. However, the specificities of constructivist epistemology challenge certain methodological aspects of Grounded Theory methods, such as how and when to use existing literature, conduct interviews to generate data and engage in the coding and theoretical sampling process for conceptualizing and proposing a theory.
The constructivist paradigm of grounded theory methodolgy resonates with the art and science of nursing through its collaborative 'real-world' reflective approach, offering a unique way to explore understudied complex clinical nursing practice.
This methodological paper is derived from a PhD study embedded in a clinical trial (NCT04019340) were the recruitment started on February 2020, approved by ethical committee of Geneva (CCER: 2019-01964).
Constructivist Grounded Theory Methodologies could support an in depth understanding of the impact of nursing interventions.
由护士主导的针对下肢静脉溃疡患者伤口愈合及预防复发的治疗性患者教育的益处仍不明确。了解患者的观点有助于深入理解他们在接受护士主导的患者教育后参与或不参与自我管理策略的原因及方式。尽管有充分证据表明需要进一步研究该人群中治疗性患者教育的益处,但对于个体如何应对慢性静脉功能不全或由此导致的溃疡,却缺乏相关研究。因此,在这篇讨论论文中,我们探讨了运用建构主义扎根理论方法所面临的挑战,以便更深入地了解接受以病情自我管理为重点的个体化护士主导患者教育项目的下肢静脉溃疡患者的经历。
识别并分析在应用建构主义扎根理论方法以更好地理解下肢静脉溃疡患者如何体验关于病情自我管理的个体化护士主导患者教育项目时所遇到的具体方法和实际挑战。
讨论论文。
建构主义方法应用于扎根理论,能够对诸如护士主导的下肢静脉溃疡患者教育等研究较少的现象进行调查。该方法重视理论的共同构建,同时考虑参与者和研究者经验的内在价值。然而,建构主义认识论的特殊性对扎根理论方法的某些方法学方面提出了挑战,比如如何以及何时使用现有文献、进行访谈以生成数据,以及参与编码和理论抽样过程以概念化并提出理论。
扎根理论方法的建构主义范式通过其协作性的“现实世界”反思方法,与护理的艺术和科学相契合,为探索研究较少的复杂临床护理实践提供了独特途径。
本方法学论文源自一项嵌入临床试验的博士研究(NCT04019340),该试验于2020年2月开始招募,已获日内瓦伦理委员会批准(CCER:2019 - 01964)。
建构主义扎根理论方法有助于深入理解护理干预的影响。