Suppr超能文献

电动自平衡滑板车在车辆碰撞事故中安全吗?

Are electric self-balancing scooters safe in vehicle crash accidents?

作者信息

Xu Jun, Shang Shi, Yu Guizhen, Qi Hongsheng, Wang Yunpeng, Xu Shucai

机构信息

Department of Automotive Engineering, School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, PR China; Advanced Vehicle Research Center, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, PR China; Beijing Key Laboratory for High-efficient Power Transmission and System Control of New Energy Resource Vehicle, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, PR China.

Department of Automotive Engineering, School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, PR China; Advanced Vehicle Research Center, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, PR China.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Feb;87:102-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.022. Epub 2015 Dec 4.

Abstract

With the pressing demand of environmentally friendly personal transportation vehicles, mobility scooters become more and more popular for the short-distance transportation. Similar to pedestrians and bicyclists, scooter riders are vulnerable road users and are expected to receive severe injuries during traffic accidents. In this research, a MADYMO model of vehicle-scooter crash scenarios is numerically set up. The model of the vehicle with the scenario is validated in pedestrian-vehicle accident investigation with previous literatures in terms of throwing distance and HIC15 value. HIC15 values gained at systematic parametric studies. Injury information from various vehicle crashing speeds (i.e. from 10m/s to 24m/s), angles (i.e. from 0 to 360°), scooter's speeds (i.e. from 0m/s to 4m/s), contact positions (i.e. left, middle and right bumper positions) are extracted, analyzed and then compared with those from widely studied pedestrian-vehicle and bicycle-vehicle accidents. Results show that the ESS provides better impact protection for the riders. Riding ESS would not increase the risk higher than walking at the same impact conditions in terms of head injury. The responsible reasons should be the smaller friction coefficient between the wheel-road than the heel-road interactions, different body gestures leading to different contact positions, forces and timing. Results may shed lights upon the future research of mobility scooter safety analysis and also the safety design guidance for the scooters.

摘要

随着对环保个人交通工具的迫切需求,电动代步车在短途交通中越来越受欢迎。与行人和骑自行车的人一样,电动代步车骑行者也是易受伤害的道路使用者,预计在交通事故中会受到重伤。在本研究中,数值建立了车辆与电动代步车碰撞场景的MADYMO模型。在行人与车辆事故调查中,结合以往文献,从抛射距离和HIC15值方面对带有该场景的车辆模型进行了验证。在系统参数研究中获得了HIC15值。提取、分析了不同车辆碰撞速度(即从10m/s到24m/s)、角度(即从0到360°)、电动代步车速度(即从0m/s到4m/s)、接触位置(即左、中、右保险杠位置)下的伤害信息,然后与广泛研究的行人与车辆以及自行车与车辆事故中的伤害信息进行比较。结果表明,ESS为骑行者提供了更好的碰撞保护。在头部受伤方面,在相同碰撞条件下,骑乘ESS不会比步行增加更高的风险。原因可能是车轮与路面之间的摩擦系数小于脚跟与路面之间的相互作用,不同的身体姿势导致不同的接触位置、力和时间。研究结果可能为电动代步车安全分析的未来研究以及电动代步车的安全设计指导提供启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验