• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动驾驶车辆的伦理决策:一个提议的模型和一系列需要(技术)规范的有价值术语列表。

Ethical Decision-Making for Self-Driving Vehicles: A Proposed Model & List of Value-Laden Terms that Warrant (Technical) Specification.

机构信息

Peter Löscher Chair of Business Ethics, Institute for Ethics in Artificial Intelligence, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Arcisstraße 21, 80333, Munich, Germany.

Institute of Automotive Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748, Garching b. Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 10;30(5):47. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00513-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-024-00513-0
PMID:39387983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11466986/
Abstract

Self-driving vehicles (SDVs) will need to make decisions that carry ethical dimensions and are of normative significance. For example, by choosing a specific trajectory, they determine how risks are distributed among traffic participants. Accordingly, policymakers, standardization organizations and scholars have conceptualized what (shall) constitute(s) ethical decision-making for SDVs. Eventually, these conceptualizations must be converted into specific system requirements to ensure proper technical implementation. Therefore, this article aims to translate critical requirements recently formulated in scholarly work, existing standards, regulatory drafts and guidelines into an explicit five-step ethical decision model for SDVs during hazardous situations. This model states a precise sequence of steps, indicates the guiding ethical principles that inform each step and points out a list of terms that demand further investigation and technical specification. By integrating ethical, legal and engineering considerations, we aim to contribute to the scholarly debate on computational ethics (particularly in autonomous driving) while offering practitioners in the automotive sector a decision-making process for SDVs that is technically viable, legally permissible, ethically grounded and adaptable to societal values. In the future, assessing the actual impact, effectiveness and admissibility of implementing the here sketched theories, terms and the overall decision process requires an empirical evaluation and testing of the overall decision-making model.

摘要

自动驾驶汽车 (SDV) 需要做出具有伦理维度和规范意义的决策。例如,通过选择特定的轨迹,它们决定了风险在交通参与者之间的分配方式。因此,政策制定者、标准化组织和学者已经对自动驾驶汽车的伦理决策应该包括哪些内容进行了概念化。最终,这些概念化必须转化为具体的系统要求,以确保适当的技术实现。因此,本文旨在将学术工作、现有标准、法规草案和指南中最近制定的关键要求转化为自动驾驶汽车在危险情况下的明确五步伦理决策模型。该模型规定了一个精确的步骤序列,指出了指导每个步骤的道德原则,并指出了需要进一步调查和技术规范的术语列表。通过整合伦理、法律和工程方面的考虑,我们旨在为计算伦理(特别是在自动驾驶领域)的学术辩论做出贡献,同时为汽车行业的从业者提供一种技术上可行、法律上允许、道德上合理且适应社会价值观的自动驾驶汽车决策过程。未来,评估实施这里描述的理论、术语和整体决策过程的实际影响、有效性和可接受性需要对整体决策模型进行实证评估和测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da0/11466986/2f79e4ecdb66/11948_2024_513_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da0/11466986/65852a755377/11948_2024_513_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da0/11466986/2f79e4ecdb66/11948_2024_513_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da0/11466986/65852a755377/11948_2024_513_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da0/11466986/2f79e4ecdb66/11948_2024_513_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethical Decision-Making for Self-Driving Vehicles: A Proposed Model & List of Value-Laden Terms that Warrant (Technical) Specification.自动驾驶车辆的伦理决策:一个提议的模型和一系列需要(技术)规范的有价值术语列表。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 10;30(5):47. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00513-0.
2
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.负责任的研究影响:创造改变的伦理准则。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
The health economics of insulin therapy: How do we address the rising demands, costs, inequalities and barriers to achieving optimal outcomes.胰岛素治疗的卫生经济学:我们如何应对不断增长的需求、成本、不平等现象以及实现最佳治疗效果的障碍。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):24-35. doi: 10.1111/dom.16488. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
6
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
7
Moral Complexity in Traffic: Advancing the ADC Model for Automated Driving Systems.交通中的道德复杂性:推进自动驾驶系统的ADC模型
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Jan 24;31(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00528-1.
8
NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.美国国立卫生研究院关于剖宫产术后阴道分娩的共识发展会议声明草案:新见解
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Mar 10;27(3):1-42.
9
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
10
Ethical Guidance for Disaster Response, Specifically Around Crisis Standards of Care: A Systematic Review.灾害应对的伦理指导,特别是围绕危机护理标准:一项系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(9):e1-e9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303882. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering safer socially sensitive autonomous vehicles using human-plausible cognitive encoding.利用似人类认知编码赋能更安全的社会敏感型自动驾驶车辆。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 27;122(21):e2401626122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401626122. Epub 2025 May 19.
2
Integrated Decision and Motion Planning for Highways with Multiple Objects Using a Naturalistic Driving Study.基于自然驾驶研究的多目标高速公路综合决策与运动规划
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 24;25(1):26. doi: 10.3390/s25010026.

本文引用的文献

1
Trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on collision injury prediction for vulnerable road users.基于对弱势道路使用者碰撞伤害预测的自动驾驶车辆轨迹规划框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Aug;203:107610. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107610. Epub 2024 May 14.
2
Towards common ethical and safe 'behaviour' standards for automated vehicles.迈向自动化车辆通用伦理和安全“行为”标准。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;174:106724. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106724. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
3
The German Act on Autonomous Driving: Why Ethics Still Matters.
德国自动驾驶法案:为何伦理仍至关重要。
Philos Technol. 2022;35(2):29. doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00526-2. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
4
Computational ethics.计算伦理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 May;26(5):388-405. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
5
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project.自动驾驶汽车中的伦理决策:AV 伦理项目。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3285-3312. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
6
The Moral Machine experiment.道德机器实验。
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):59-64. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
7
How Should Autonomous Cars Drive? A Preference for Defaults in Moral Judgments Under Risk and Uncertainty.自动驾驶汽车应该如何驾驶?风险与不确定性下道德判断中对默认选项的偏好。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):295-314. doi: 10.1111/risa.13178. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
8
Autonomous Cars: In Favor of a Mandatory Ethics Setting.自动驾驶汽车:赞成强制性伦理设置。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):681-700. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9806-x. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
9
Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions.稀缺医疗干预措施的分配原则。
Lancet. 2009 Jan 31;373(9661):423-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60137-9.
10
Ethics and radiation protection.伦理与辐射防护
J Radiol Prot. 2007 Jun;27(2):147-56. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/27/2/002. Epub 2007 May 24.