• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

房间里的大象——分析印度南部班加罗尔国家公园可持续管理的地方话语。

Elephants in the Room - Analyzing Local Discourses for Sustainable Management of Bannerghatta National Park, South India.

机构信息

Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):52-72. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01980-8. Epub 2024 May 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-024-01980-8
PMID:38753052
Abstract

Landscape governance challenges, particularly in peri-urban contexts like the Bannerghatta National Park (BNP) region in South India, exemplify 'wicked' problems due to their inherent complexities. These challenges arise from a mix of conflicting interests, policy ambiguities, and sociocultural dynamics, which often blur the definition of problems and hinder effective solutions. Despite apparent options for resolution, stakeholder disagreements and deep uncertainties about implementation strategies complicate governance. This study, therefore, has two broad objectives. The first objective is to analyze the local discourses surrounding planned policy interventions around the BNP region in South India. Based on the findings, the second objective is to draw insights for sustainable natural resource governance research and practice. We applied Q-methodology to understand the discourses that underpin various conflicts in the rapidly urbanizing elephant corridor at BNP. We elicited information on how various local actors frame solutions to current collective action challenges in the BNP landscape and their perspectives on the proposed eco-sensitive zone notification, as well as the functioning of current policy interventions concerning conservation and development. The study uncovers the micropolitics and power regimes underpinning various natural resource governance challenges and demonstrates the utility of the Q-methodology in bringing diverse perspectives together in response to 'wicked' governance challenges.

摘要

景观治理挑战,特别是在班加罗尔国家公园(BNP)等印度南部的城市周边地区,由于其固有的复杂性,是典型的“棘手”问题。这些挑战源于利益冲突、政策模糊以及社会文化动态等多种因素的混合,这些因素往往模糊了问题的定义,并阻碍了有效的解决方案。尽管有明显的解决方案,但利益相关者的分歧以及对实施策略的深深不确定性使得治理变得复杂。因此,本研究有两个主要目标。第一个目标是分析印度南部 BNP 地区周边计划政策干预的当地话语。基于研究结果,第二个目标是为可持续自然资源治理研究和实践提供启示。我们应用 Q 方法来理解支撑 BNP 迅速城市化象走廊中各种冲突的话语。我们收集了有关各种当地行为者如何构建 BNP 景观当前集体行动挑战的解决方案的信息,以及他们对拟议的生态敏感区通知的看法,以及与保护和发展有关的现行政策干预的运作情况。该研究揭示了支撑各种自然资源治理挑战的微观政治和权力机制,并展示了 Q 方法在应对“棘手”治理挑战时将各种观点汇聚在一起的实用性。

相似文献

1
Elephants in the Room - Analyzing Local Discourses for Sustainable Management of Bannerghatta National Park, South India.房间里的大象——分析印度南部班加罗尔国家公园可持续管理的地方话语。
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):52-72. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01980-8. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Assessing the Effects of a Cognition-Based Education Program on Attitudes of Villagers Toward Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) in Conflict-Prone Areas.评估基于认知的教育计划对冲突多发地区村民对亚洲象(Elephas maximus)态度的影响。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2022 Oct-Dec;25(4):368-381. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2021.1902812. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
3
Local's attitude towards African elephant conservation in and around Chebra Churchura National Park, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚切布拉·乔楚拉国家公园及其周边地区当地人对保护非洲象的态度。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0292641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292641. eCollection 2023.
4
Trenches reduce crop foraging by elephants: Lessons from Kibale National Park, Uganda for elephant conservation in densely settled rural landscapes.壕沟减少了大象的作物觅食:来自乌干达基巴莱国家公园的教训,适用于人口密集的农村景观中的大象保护。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 26;18(7):e0288115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288115. eCollection 2023.
5
Stakeholder Perceptions on Landscape Governance in Northern Ghana: A Q-Study to Identify Common Concern Entry Points for Integrated Landscape Approaches.加纳北部利益相关者对景观治理的看法:一项 Q 研究,以确定综合景观方法的共同关注切入点。
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):31-51. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01881-2. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
6
The Role of Multistakeholder Platforms in Environmental Governance: Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions in Kalomo District, Zambia, Using Q-Method.多利益相关方平台在环境治理中的作用:使用质方法分析赞比亚卡洛莫区的利益相关者感知
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):13-30. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01806-z. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
7
Do topography and fruit presence influence occurrence and intensity of crop-raiding by forest elephants (Loxodonta africana cyclotis)?地形和果实存在是否会影响森林象(非洲草原象指名亚种)的作物掠夺发生和强度?
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 22;14(3):e0213971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213971. eCollection 2019.
8
Governance of China's Potatso National Park Influenced by Local Community Participation.中国马铃薯国家公园的治理受到当地社区参与的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):807. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010807.
9
Top-down, Bottom-up and Sideways: The Multilayered Complexities of Multi-level Actors Shaping Forest Governance and REDD+ Arrangements in Madre de Dios, Peru.自上而下、自下而上和横向:塑造秘鲁马德雷德迪奥斯森林治理和 REDD+ 安排的多层次行动者的复杂情况。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jul;62(1):98-116. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0982-5. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
10
A cross-national comparison of the efficacy of community-based and national governance approaches on the protection of the African elephant.社区治理与国家治理模式在保护非洲象方面的效果跨国比较。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 1;231:336-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Making Landscapes Negotiable: Q-methodology as a Boundary-Spanning and Empowering Diagnostic.使景观具有可协商性:Q 方法论作为一种跨越边界和赋权的诊断方法。
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):4-12. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-02004-1. Epub 2024 Jun 10.