• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时重新邀请最初不符合条件的人群进行目标性肺癌筛查?

When to reinvite initially ineligible populations for targeted lung cancer screening?

机构信息

Manchester Thoracic Oncology Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 May 15;11(1):e002193. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002193.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002193
PMID:38754907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11097831/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Targeted low-dose CT lung cancer screening reduces lung cancer mortality. England's Targeted Lung Health Check programme uses risk prediction tools to determine eligibility for biennial screening among people with a smoking history aged 55-74. Some participants initially ineligible for lung cancer screening will later become eligible with increasing age and ongoing tobacco exposure. It is, therefore, important to understand how many people could qualify for reinvitation, and after how long, to inform implementation of services.

METHODS

We prospectively predicted future risk (using Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian trial's risk model (PLCO) and Liverpool Lung Project version 2 (LLP) risk models) and time-to-eligibility of 5345 participants to estimate how many would become eligible through the course of a Lung Health Check screening programme for 55-74 years.

RESULTS

Approximately a quarter eventually become eligible, with those with the lowest baseline risks unlikely to ever become eligible. Time-to-eligibility is shorter for participants with higher baseline risk, increasing age and ongoing smoking status. At a PLCO threshold ≥1.51%, 68% of those who continue to smoke become eligible compared with 18% of those who have quit.

DISCUSSION

Predicting which participants may become eligible, and when, during a screening programme can help inform reinvitation strategies and service planning. Those with risk scores closer to the eligibility threshold, particularly people who continue to smoke, will reach eligibility in subsequent rounds while those at the lowest risk may be discharged from the programme from the outset.

摘要

简介

靶向低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查可降低肺癌死亡率。英国的靶向肺部健康检查计划使用风险预测工具来确定有吸烟史的 55-74 岁人群是否有资格进行两年一次的筛查。一些最初不符合肺癌筛查条件的参与者随着年龄的增长和持续的烟草暴露,以后可能会有资格进行筛查。因此,了解有多少人可以重新邀请以及需要多长时间才能重新邀请,对于为服务的实施提供信息是很重要的。

方法

我们前瞻性地预测了未来的风险(使用前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌试验的风险模型(PLCO)和利物浦肺癌项目 2 版(LLP)风险模型)和 5345 名参与者的资格时间,以估计有多少人将通过 55-74 岁的肺部健康检查计划获得资格。

结果

大约四分之一的人最终会获得资格,而那些基线风险最低的人不太可能获得资格。对于基线风险较高的参与者,时间到资格的时间更短,年龄和持续吸烟状况增加。在 PLCO 阈值≥1.51%时,与已经戒烟的人相比,继续吸烟的人中约有 68%有资格参加。

讨论

预测哪些参与者可能在筛查计划期间获得资格,以及何时获得资格,可以帮助确定重新邀请策略和服务规划。那些风险评分接近资格门槛的人,特别是那些继续吸烟的人,将在随后的轮次中获得资格,而那些风险最低的人可能会从计划一开始就被淘汰。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069a/11097831/c584fdd78091/bmjresp-2023-002193f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069a/11097831/f93e34d1ad35/bmjresp-2023-002193f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069a/11097831/c584fdd78091/bmjresp-2023-002193f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069a/11097831/f93e34d1ad35/bmjresp-2023-002193f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069a/11097831/c584fdd78091/bmjresp-2023-002193f02.jpg

相似文献

1
When to reinvite initially ineligible populations for targeted lung cancer screening?何时重新邀请最初不符合条件的人群进行目标性肺癌筛查?
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 May 15;11(1):e002193. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002193.
2
Analysis of lung cancer risk model (PLCO and LLP) performance in a community-based lung cancer screening programme.基于社区的肺癌筛查项目中肺癌风险模型(PLCO 和 LLP)性能分析。
Thorax. 2020 Aug;75(8):661-668. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214626. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
Stratification and management of patients ineligible for lung cancer screening.不适合肺癌筛查患者的分层和管理。
Respir Med. 2021 Nov;188:106610. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106610. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
4
Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data.风险预测模型与简化选择标准在确定肺癌筛查资格中的比较:基于德国联邦范围调查和发病数据的分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;35(10):899-912. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00657-w. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
5
Addressing Sex Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility: USPSTF vs PLCOm2012 Criteria.解决肺癌筛查资格方面的性别差异:美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)与PLCOm2012标准对比
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):248-256. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.066. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
Identifying high risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening: Independent validation of the PLCO risk prediction tool.确定高危人群进行有针对性的肺癌筛查:PLCO 风险预测工具的独立验证。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;141(2):242-253. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30673. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
7
Sensitivity of US Preventive Services Task Force and PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria in individuals with lung cancer in South Dakota self-reporting as Indigenous and non-Indigenous.南达科他州肺癌患者自我报告为原住民和非原住民的情况下,美国预防服务工作组和 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准的敏感性。
Cancer. 2023 Dec 15;129(24):3894-3904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34947. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
8
Selection of eligible participants for screening for lung cancer using primary care data.利用初级保健数据筛选肺癌的合格参与者。
Thorax. 2022 Sep;77(9):882-890. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217142. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
9
USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.USPSTF2013 与 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准(国际肺癌筛查试验):前瞻性队列研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
10
Prediction of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Using Simplified Criteria.简化标准预测肺癌筛查资格。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Oct;16(10):1280-1285. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-239OC.

本文引用的文献

1
Invitation strategies and participation in a community-based lung cancer screening programme located in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation.邀请策略和参与位于高社会经济剥夺地区的社区肺癌筛查计划。
Thorax. 2023 Dec 15;79(1):58-67. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220001.
2
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
3
Liverpool Lung Project lung cancer risk stratification model: calibration and prospective validation.
利物浦肺项目肺癌风险分层模型:校准和前瞻性验证。
Thorax. 2021 Feb;76(2):161-168. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215158. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
Analysis of lung cancer risk model (PLCO and LLP) performance in a community-based lung cancer screening programme.基于社区的肺癌筛查项目中肺癌风险模型(PLCO 和 LLP)性能分析。
Thorax. 2020 Aug;75(8):661-668. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214626. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
Implementing lung cancer screening: baseline results from a community-based 'Lung Health Check' pilot in deprived areas of Manchester.实施肺癌筛查:曼彻斯特贫困地区社区“肺部健康检查”试点的基线结果。
Thorax. 2019 Apr;74(4):405-409. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211377. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
6
Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening.肺癌筛查的选择标准。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):728-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211776.