• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培育基层医疗多方协作的变革性地方结构:来自印度部分邦的定性见解。

Nurturing transformative local structures of multisectoral collaboration for primary health care: qualitative insights from select states in India.

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (JHSPH), Baltimore, USA.

Johns Hopkins India Private Limited, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 16;24(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11002-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11002-2
PMID:38755604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11100027/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multisectoral collaboration is essential for advancing primary health care (PHC). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), limited institutional capacities, governance issues, and inadequate stakeholder engagement impede multisectoral collaboration. India faces similar challenges, especially at the meso-level (districts and subdistricts). Owing to its dependence on context, and insufficient evidence, understanding "How" to improve multisectoral collaboration remains challenging. This study aims to elicit specific recommendations to strengthen meso-level stewardship in India for multisectoral collaboration. The findings from this study may offer lessons for other LMICs.

METHODS

Using purposive, maximum variation sampling, the study team conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 diverse participants, including policymakers, implementers, development agency representatives, and academics experienced in multisectoral initiatives. The interviews delved into participants' experiences, the current situation, enablers, and recommendations for enhancing stakeholder engagement and capacities at the meso-level for multisectoral collaboration.

RESULTS

Context and power are critical elements to consider in fostering effective collaboration. Multisectoral collaboration was particularly successful in three distinct governance contexts: the social-democratic context as in Kerala, the social governance context in Chhattisgarh, and the public health governance context in Tamil Nadu. Adequate health system input and timely guidance instil confidence among local implementers to collaborate. While power plays a role through local leadership's influence in setting agendas, convening stakeholders, and ensuring accountability. To nurture transformative local leaders for collaboration, holistic, equity-driven, community-informed approaches are essential. The study participants proposed several concrete steps: at the state level, establish "central management units" for supervising local implementers and ensuring bottom-up feedback; at the district level, rationalise committees and assign deliverables to stakeholders; and at the block level, expand convergence structures and involve local self-governments. Development partners can support data-driven priority setting, but local implementers with contextual familiarity should develop decentralised plans collaboratively, articulating rationales, activities, and resources. Finally, innovative training programs are required at all levels, fostering humility, motivation, equity awareness, leadership, problem- solving, and data use proficiency.

CONCLUSION

This study offers multiple solutions to enhance local implementers' engagement in multisectoral efforts, advocating for the development, piloting, and evaluation of innovative approaches such as the block convergence model, locally-led collaboration efforts, and novel training methods for local implementers.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/11100027/fe7fb161ff5c/12913_2024_11002_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/11100027/bdc8b04ce281/12913_2024_11002_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/11100027/fe7fb161ff5c/12913_2024_11002_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/11100027/bdc8b04ce281/12913_2024_11002_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/11100027/fe7fb161ff5c/12913_2024_11002_Fig2_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

多部门协作对于推进初级卫生保健(PHC)至关重要。在中低收入国家(LMICs),机构能力有限、治理问题以及利益相关者参与不足等因素阻碍了多部门协作。印度也面临着类似的挑战,尤其是在中观层面(地区和分区)。由于对背景的依赖以及证据不足,理解“如何”加强多部门协作仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在为印度加强中观层面的多部门协作提出具体建议。这项研究的结果可能为其他 LMICs 提供经验教训。

方法

研究团队采用有目的、最大差异抽样方法,对 20 名来自不同背景的参与者进行了半结构化访谈,包括政策制定者、执行者、发展机构代表以及在多部门倡议方面有经验的学者。访谈深入探讨了参与者在多部门协作方面的经验、现状、促进因素和建议,以增强中观层面的利益相关者参与和能力。

结果

背景和权力是促进有效协作的关键因素。多部门协作在三个不同的治理背景下取得了特别成功:社会民主背景下的喀拉拉邦、社会治理背景下的恰蒂斯加尔邦和公共卫生治理背景下的泰米尔纳德邦。充分的卫生系统投入和及时的指导使当地执行者有信心进行协作。虽然权力通过地方领导层在设定议程、召集利益相关者和确保问责制方面的影响力发挥作用。为了培养有变革能力的协作地方领导者,需要采取整体的、以公平为导向的、以社区为基础的方法。研究参与者提出了几项具体步骤:在邦层面,设立“中央管理单位”,负责监督地方执行者并确保自下而上的反馈;在区层面,对委员会进行合理化并向利益相关者分配可交付成果;在街区层面,扩大融合结构并让地方自治政府参与进来。发展伙伴可以支持数据驱动的重点设定,但具有背景知识的当地执行者应该共同制定分散的计划,阐明理由、活动和资源。最后,需要在各个层面提供创新培训计划,培养谦逊、动力、公平意识、领导力、解决问题和数据使用能力。

结论

本研究提出了多种方法来加强地方执行者在多部门工作中的参与度,倡导制定、试点和评估创新方法,如街区融合模式、地方主导的协作努力以及针对地方执行者的新型培训方法。

相似文献

1
Nurturing transformative local structures of multisectoral collaboration for primary health care: qualitative insights from select states in India.培育基层医疗多方协作的变革性地方结构:来自印度部分邦的定性见解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 16;24(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11002-2.
2
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
3
Improved Multisectoral Nutrition Governance in Kenya is Influenced by Ministry Affiliation and Level of Nutrition Prioritization in Line Ministries.肯尼亚多部门营养治理的改善受到部委隶属关系和各职能部委营养优先事项水平的影响。
Food Nutr Bull. 2025 Jul 17:3795721251357628. doi: 10.1177/03795721251357628.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
7
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
8
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
9
Quality, Usability, and Trust Challenges to Effective Data Use in the Deployment and Use of the Bangladesh Nutrition Information System Dashboard: Qualitative Study.质量、可用性和信任挑战对孟加拉营养信息系统仪表板的部署和使用中的有效数据使用的影响:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 30;26:e48294. doi: 10.2196/48294.
10
Power dynamics and intersectoral collaboration for health in low and middle income countries: A realist review.低收入和中等收入国家卫生领域的权力动态与部门间合作:一项现实主义综述
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Apr 5. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf022.

本文引用的文献

1
Strengthening institutions for public health education: results of an SWOT analysis from India to inform global best practices.加强公共卫生教育机构:来自印度的 SWOT 分析结果,以为全球最佳实践提供信息。
Hum Resour Health. 2022 Feb 19;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00714-3.
2
Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy: an umbrella review protocol.跨部门和多部门方法在卫生政策中的应用:综述方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 15;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00826-1.
3
Power analysis in health policy and systems research: a guide to research conceptualisation.
卫生政策和体系研究中的功效分析:研究概念化指南。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007268.
4
Intersectoral Action for Early Childhood Development in India: Opportunities, Challenges and the Way Forward.印度儿童早期发展的跨部门行动:机遇、挑战和未来方向。
Indian Pediatr. 2021 Nov 15;58 Suppl 1:S28-S31.
5
Policy Processes in Multisectoral Tobacco Control in India: The Role of Institutional Architecture, Political Engagement and Legal Interventions.印度多部门烟草控制政策过程:制度架构、政治参与和法律干预的作用。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1703-1714. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.66. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Systemic factors for enhancing intersectoral collaboration for the operationalization of One Health: a case study in India.促进“同一健康”实施的跨部门协作的系统因素:印度的一个案例研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 May 4;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00727-9.
7
Specific considerations for research on the effectiveness of multisectoral collaboration: methods and lessons from 12 country case studies.多部门协作有效性研究的具体考虑因素:来自 12 个国家案例研究的方法和经验教训。
Global Health. 2021 Feb 1;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00664-w.
8
Primary health care and sustainable development goals.初级卫生保健与可持续发展目标。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):792-800. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.245613. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
9
The local governance of COVID-19: Disease prevention and social security in rural India.印度农村地区的新冠疫情地方治理:疾病预防与社会保障
World Dev. 2021 Feb;138:105234. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105234. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
10
Methodological gaps and opportunities for studying multisectoral collaboration for health in low- and middle-income countries.研究中低收入国家卫生多部门协作的方法学差距和机遇。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Nov 1;34(Supplement_2):ii7-ii17. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz116.