Suppr超能文献

针对自闭症个体的Catalyst Datafinch应用行为分析数据收集应用程序的内部一致性信度研究。

An Internal Consistency Reliability Study of the Catalyst Datafinch Applied Behavior Analysis Data Collection Application With Autistic Individuals.

作者信息

Peterson Tami, Dodson Jessica, Sherwin Robert, Strale Frederick

机构信息

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, The Oxford Center, Brighton, USA.

Applied Behavior Analysis, The Oxford Center, Brighton, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Apr 16;16(4):e58379. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58379. eCollection 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction Many psychometric studies have scrutinized the dependability of different instruments for evaluating and treating autism using applied behavior analysis (ABA). However, there has been no exploration into the psychometric attributes of the Catalyst Datafinch Applied Behavior Analysis Data Collection Application, namely, internal consistency reliability measures. Materials and methods  Four datasets were extracted (n=100, 98, 103, and 62) from published studies at The Oxford Center, Brighton, MI, ranging from March 19, 2023, through January 8, 2024, using Catalyst Datafinch as the data collection tool. All data were gathered by Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs) and behavioral technicians and designed to replicate how practitioners collect traditional paper and pencil data. SPSS Statistics (v. 29.0) computed internal consistency reliability measures, including Cronbach's alpha, inter-item, split-half, and interclass correlation coefficients. Results  Dataset #1: Cronbach's alpha was 0.916 with seven items, indicating excellent reliability. Cronbach's split-half reliability for Part 1 was 0.777, indicating good reliability, and for Part 2 was 0.972, indicating excellent reliability. Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.817, indicating good reliability. Inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.474 to 0.970. The average measures interclass correlation (ICC) was 0.916, indicating excellent reliability. Single measures (ICC) reliability was 0.609, indicating acceptable reliability. Dataset #2: Cronbach's alpha was 0.954 with three items, indicating excellent reliability. Cronbach's split-half reliability for Part 1 was 0.912, indicating excellent reliability, and for Part 2 was 0.975, indicating excellent reliability. Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.917, indicating excellent reliability. Inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.827 to 0.977. Average measures (ICC) was 0.954, indicating excellent reliability. Single measures (ICC) reliability was 0.875, indicating good reliability. Dataset #3: Cronbach's alpha was 0.974 with three items, indicating excellent reliability. Cronbach's split-half reliability for Part 1 was 0.978, indicating excellent reliability. Split-half reliability for Part 2 was 0.970, indicating excellent reliability. Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.935, indicating excellent reliability. Inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.931 to 0.972. The average measures (ICC) was 0.974, indicating excellent reliability. Single measures (ICC) reliability was 0.926, indicating excellent reliability. Dataset #4: Cronbach's alpha was 0.980 with 12 items, indicating excellent reliability. Cronbach's split-half reliability for Part 1 was 0.973, indicating excellent reliability. Split-half reliability for Part 2 was 0.996, indicating excellent reliability. Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.838, indicating good reliability. Inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.692 to 0.999. The average measures (ICC) was 0.980, indicating excellent reliability. Single measures (ICC) reliability was 0.804, indicating good reliability. Conclusions These results suggest that Catalyst Datafinch demonstrates high internal consistency reliability when used with individuals with autism. This indicates that the application is reliable for collecting and analyzing behavioral data in this population. The ratings ranged from good to excellent, indicating a high consistency in the measurements.

摘要

引言 许多心理测量研究都仔细审查了使用应用行为分析(ABA)评估和治疗自闭症的不同工具的可靠性。然而,尚未对Catalyst Datafinch应用行为分析数据收集应用程序的心理测量属性进行探索,即内部一致性可靠性测量。

材料和方法 从密歇根州布莱顿牛津中心2023年3月19日至2024年1月8日发表的研究中提取了四个数据集(n = 100、98、103和62),使用Catalyst Datafinch作为数据收集工具。所有数据均由董事会认证行为分析师(BCBA)和行为技术人员收集,旨在复制从业者收集传统纸笔数据的方式。SPSS Statistics(v. 29.0)计算了内部一致性可靠性测量,包括克朗巴哈系数、项目间、分半和组内相关系数。

结果 数据集#1:七个项目的克朗巴哈系数为0.916,表明可靠性极佳。第1部分的克朗巴哈分半信度为0.777,表明可靠性良好,第2部分为0.972,表明可靠性极佳。古特曼分半系数为0.817,表明可靠性良好。项目间相关系数范围为0.474至0.970。平均组内相关(ICC)为0.916,表明可靠性极佳。单个测量(ICC)可靠性为0.609,表明可靠性可接受。

数据集#2:三个项目的克朗巴哈系数为0.954,表明可靠性极佳。第1部分的克朗巴哈分半信度为0.912,表明可靠性极佳,第2部分为0.975,表明可靠性极佳。古特曼分半系数为0.917,表明可靠性极佳。项目间相关系数范围为0.827至0.977。平均测量(ICC)为0.954,表明可靠性极佳。单个测量(ICC)可靠性为0.875,表明可靠性良好。

数据集#3:三个项目的克朗巴哈系数为0.974,表明可靠性极佳。第1部分的克朗巴哈分半信度为0.978,表明可靠性极佳。第2部分的分半信度为0.970,表明可靠性极佳。古特曼分半系数为0.935,表明可靠性极佳。项目间相关系数范围为0.931至0.972。平均测量(ICC)为0.974,表明可靠性极佳。单个测量(ICC)可靠性为0.926,表明可靠性极佳。

数据集#4:12个项目的克朗巴哈系数为0.980,表明可靠性极佳。第1部分的克朗巴哈分半信度为0.973,表明可靠性极佳。第2部分的分半信度为0.996,表明可靠性极佳。古特曼分半系数为0.838,表明可靠性良好。项目间相关系数范围为0.692至0.999。平均测量(ICC)为0.980,表明可靠性极佳。单个测量(ICC)可靠性为0.804,表明可靠性良好。

结论 这些结果表明,Catalyst Datafinch在与自闭症患者一起使用时表现出较高的内部一致性可靠性。这表明该应用程序在收集和分析该人群的行为数据方面是可靠的。评级范围从良好到优秀,表明测量具有高度一致性。

相似文献

2
Spearman-Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach's alpha: different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 May;85:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
3
Is PDQ-39 a reliable measure of quality of life of patients at advanced stages of Parkinson's disease considered for Deep Brain Stimulation.
Heliyon. 2024 May 16;10(10):e31325. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31325. eCollection 2024 May 30.
5
Development and validation of a new non-disease-specific survey tool to assess self-reported adherence to medication.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Dec 7;13:981368. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.981368. eCollection 2022.
6
Revision of the nonsuicidal selfinjury behavior scale for adolescents with mental disorder.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Mar 28;47(3):301-308. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210549.
8
Development and validation of the sitting balance assessment for spinal cord injury (SitBASCI).
Spinal Cord. 2022 Sep;60(9):826-830. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00799-6. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
10
Initial validation of the Yin-Yang Assessment Questionnaire for persons with diabetes mellitus.
World J Diabetes. 2015 Sep 10;6(11):1198-206. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i11.1198.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-Engineering the Educational System: Technology Transfer from a Behavioral Perspective.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Feb 3;48(1):59-81. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00432-w. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

2
Treating Target Behaviors of Autistic Individuals With Applied Behavior Analysis: An Ongoing Replication Study.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 13;16(2):e54109. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54109. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Impact of Applied Behavior Analysis on Autistic Children Target Behaviors: A Replication Using Repeated Measures.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53372. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53372. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Validity and Reliability Evidence for Assessments Based in Applied Behavior Analysis: A Systematic Review.
Behav Modif. 2023 Jan;47(1):247-288. doi: 10.1177/01454455221098151. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
6
7
Brief Report: Examining Test-Retest Reliability of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) Calibrated Severity Scores (CSS).
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Mar;52(3):1388-1394. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04952-7. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
8
Composite reliability of multilevel data: It's about observed scores and construct meanings.
Psychol Methods. 2021 Feb;26(1):90-102. doi: 10.1037/met0000287. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Efficacy of Interventions Based on Applied Behavior Analysis for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.
Psychiatry Investig. 2020 May;17(5):432-443. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0229. Epub 2020 May 8.
10
Psychometric Evaluation of Social Cognitive Measures for Adults with Autism.
Autism Res. 2019 May;12(5):766-778. doi: 10.1002/aur.2084. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验