• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症患者参与研究的同意与纳入:制定基于权利的包容性实践的加拿大议程。

Consent and Inclusion of People Living with Dementia (PLWD) in Research: Establishing a Canadian Agenda for Inclusive Rights-Based Practices.

作者信息

Grenier Amanda, O'Connor Deborah, James Krista, Imahori Daphne, Minchopoulos Daniella, Velev Nicole, Tamblyn-Watts Laura, Mann Jim

机构信息

Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Aging. 2024 Dec;43(4):621-628. doi: 10.1017/S0714980824000217. Epub 2024 May 20.

DOI:10.1017/S0714980824000217
PMID:38764147
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People living with dementia (PLWD) may want to participate in research, but the guidelines and processes enacted across various contexts may prohibit this from happening.

OBJECTIVE

Understanding the experiences of people with lived experiences of dementia requires meaningful inclusion in research, as is consistent with rights-based perspectives. Currently, the inclusion of PLWD in Canadian research is complex, and guidelines and conceptual frameworks have not been fully developed.

METHODS

This research note outlines a three-year proof-of-concept grant on the inclusion and consent of PLWD in research.

FINDINGS

It presents a brief report on some of the contradictions and challenges that exist in legislation, research guidelines, and research practices and raises a series of questions as part of an agenda on rights and inclusion of PLWD in research.

DISCUSSION

It suggests conceptual, legal, and policy issues that need to be addressed and invites Canadian researchers to re-envision research practices and to advocate for law and policy reform that enables dementia research to align and respect the rights and personhood of PLWD.

摘要

背景

痴呆症患者(PLWD)可能希望参与研究,但不同背景下制定的指导方针和流程可能会阻碍这一情况的发生。

目的

从基于权利的角度来看,要了解有痴呆症生活经历者的体验,就需要在研究中切实将他们纳入。目前,加拿大研究中纳入痴呆症患者的情况很复杂,相关指导方针和概念框架尚未完全建立。

方法

本研究报告概述了一项为期三年的关于痴呆症患者参与研究及同意问题的概念验证资助项目。

研究结果

报告简要介绍了立法、研究指导方针和研究实践中存在的一些矛盾和挑战,并提出了一系列问题,作为痴呆症患者在研究中的权利与纳入议程的一部分。

讨论

提出了需要解决的概念、法律和政策问题,并邀请加拿大研究人员重新审视研究实践,倡导法律和政策改革,以使痴呆症研究能够符合并尊重痴呆症患者的权利和人格。

相似文献

1
Consent and Inclusion of People Living with Dementia (PLWD) in Research: Establishing a Canadian Agenda for Inclusive Rights-Based Practices.痴呆症患者参与研究的同意与纳入:制定基于权利的包容性实践的加拿大议程。
Can J Aging. 2024 Dec;43(4):621-628. doi: 10.1017/S0714980824000217. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
A research agenda for promoting continence for people living with dementia in the community: Recommendations based on a critical review and expert-by-experience opinion.促进社区中痴呆症患者的自理能力的研究议程:基于批判性评价和专家经验意见的建议。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1933-1946. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15537. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
3
Advocating the rights of people with dementia to contribute to research: Considerations for researchers and ethics committees.倡导痴呆症患者参与研究的权利:研究人员和伦理委员会应考虑的事项。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Jun;41(2):309-313. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13023. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
4
Contributions of Persons Living With Dementia to Scientific Research Meetings. Results From the National Research Summit on Care, Services, and Supports for Persons With Dementia and Their Caregivers.与痴呆症患者共同参与科学研究会议。来自全国痴呆症患者及其照护者的照护、服务和支持研究峰会的结果。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):421-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
5
The experiences of hospital staff who provide care for people living with dementia: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.为患有痴呆症的人群提供护理的医护人员的体验:系统综述和定性研究的综合分析。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Dec;15(4):e12325. doi: 10.1111/opn.12325. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
[The human body, subject or object of rights?].[人体,权利主体还是客体?]
Soins. 2018 Jan-Feb;63(822):16-18. doi: 10.1016/j.soin.2017.12.003.
7
Carers' experiences and perspectives of the use of anticholinergic medications in people living with dementia: Analysis of an online discussion forum.照顾者对痴呆症患者使用抗胆碱能药物的体验和看法:对在线讨论论坛的分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13972. doi: 10.1111/hex.13972.
8
Ethical and Regulatory Issues for Embedded Pragmatic Trials Involving People Living with Dementia.涉及痴呆症患者的嵌入式实用临床试验的伦理和监管问题。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S37-S42. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16620.
9
Is the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Impacting Mental Health Laws and Policies in High-Income Countries? A Case Study of Implementation in Canada.《联合国残疾人权利公约》对高收入国家的精神卫生法律和政策有影响吗?以加拿大的实施情况为例
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Nov 11;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0103-1.
10
Reconceptualising Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: Views of People Living With Dementia and Families/Care Partners.重新认识痴呆症的行为和心理症状:痴呆症患者及其家人/护理伙伴的观点。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 16;12:710703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.710703. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to codesigning social robots with older adults living with dementia: A scoping review.与患有痴呆症的老年人共同设计社交机器人的促进因素和障碍:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 17;11:20552076251365066. doi: 10.1177/20552076251365066. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Reviewing and Advocating for Data Disaggregation in Aging-Related Health Research: NIA Grants and Recommendations for Equity.审视并倡导老年健康研究中的数据分解:美国国立衰老研究所的资助与公平性建议
Gerontologist. 2025 Mar 25;65(4). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf013.
3
"Research happens a lot in other settings-so why not here?" A qualitative interview study of stakeholders' views about advance planning for care home residents' research participation.
“在其他环境中进行了很多研究——为什么这里不行?”一项关于利益攸关方对养老院居民参与研究的预先计划看法的定性访谈研究。
Age Ageing. 2024 Oct 1;53(10). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae235.
4
Challenges and Solutions in Recruiting Older Vulnerable Adults in Research.招募老年弱势成年人参与研究的挑战与解决方案
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 30;69:1607247. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607247. eCollection 2024.