• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版不孕症自我效能量表:信效度评估

A Chinese version of the infertility self-efficacy scale: Reliability and validity assessment.

作者信息

Xu Jing, Zhouchen Yi-Bei, Wang Rong, Redding Sharon R, Fu Dou, Ouyang Yan-Qiong

机构信息

School of Nursing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 May 4;10(9):e30686. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30686. eCollection 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30686
PMID:38765167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11098823/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To translate, cross-culturally adapt and test the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Infertility Self-Efficacy scale.

METHODS

The Infertility Self-Efficacy (ISE) scale was translated into Chinese using forward and backward translations, expert consultation, cognitive interviews and a pilot study. To test the scale's reliability and validity, 515 infertile women in two hospitals were recruited to evaluate the Chinese version of the scale. Content validity was assessed by means of expert consultation. Exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 and Amos 24.0. Reliability tests of the scale included Cronbach's alpha coefficient, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of the ISE scale contains 16 items and one dimension. Content validity of the scale was 0.96. Results of exploratory factor analysis suggested that the one factor model was suitable for the scale, and factor loading of all items was greater than 0.4. Model fitting parameters of confirmatory factor analysis of the ISE scale were χ/df = 2.710, Root Mean Square Error Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.079, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.042, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.953, and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.939. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Chinese ISE was 0.980; split-half coefficient was 0.972 and retest reliability was 0.848 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The Chinese ISE scale is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate the self-efficacy of infertile Chinese women.

摘要

目的

翻译、跨文化调适并检验中文版不孕症自我效能量表的信效度。

方法

采用正向和反向翻译、专家咨询、认知访谈及预试验,将不孕症自我效能量表(ISE)翻译成中文。为检验该量表的信效度,招募了两家医院的515名不孕女性对中文版量表进行评估。通过专家咨询评估内容效度。使用SPSS 26.0和Amos 24.0进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。该量表的信度检验包括克朗巴哈α系数、分半信度和重测信度。

结果

中文版ISE量表包含16个条目和1个维度。该量表的内容效度为0.96。探索性因素分析结果表明单因素模型适用于该量表,所有条目的因素负荷均大于0.4。ISE量表验证性因素分析的模型拟合参数为χ/df = 2.710,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)= 0.079,标准化均方根残差(SRMR)= 0.042,比较拟合指数(CFI)= 0.953,塔克 - 刘易斯指数(TLI)= 0.939。中文版ISE的克朗巴哈α系数为0.980;分半系数为0.972,重测信度为0.848(P < 0.01)。

结论

中文版ISE量表是评估中国不孕女性自我效能的可靠且有效的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/11098823/f05a4632da99/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/11098823/9cab2827da6e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/11098823/f05a4632da99/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/11098823/9cab2827da6e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea57/11098823/f05a4632da99/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Chinese version of the infertility self-efficacy scale: Reliability and validity assessment.中文版不孕症自我效能量表:信效度评估
Heliyon. 2024 May 4;10(9):e30686. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30686. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
The transcultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Oral Health Literacy Scale for Diabetic Patients.《中文版糖尿病患者口腔健康素养量表的跨文化调适与验证》。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03965-9.
3
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
4
Validation of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the active-empathic listening scale.中文版积极共情倾听量表的信效度验证
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 23;13:938461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.938461. eCollection 2022.
5
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Brief Emotion and Regulation Beliefs Scale in Chinese nursing students.中文版简短情绪与调节信念量表在中国护理专业学生中的信效度研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Aug 9;21(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00992-1.
6
Reliability and validity evaluation of the appropriate antibiotic use self-efficacy scale for Chinese adults.中文成年人合理使用抗生素自我效能感量表的信度和效度评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):1344. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13729-1.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Infertility Self-Efficacy Scale.韩文版不孕症自我效能量表的心理测量学特性
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2017 Sep;11(3):159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Aug 13.
8
Psychometric properties of the chinese version of the value-based stigma inventory (VASI): a translation and validation study.基于价值的污名量表(VASI)中文版的心理计量学特性:翻译和验证研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05998-4.
9
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the maternal postpartum stress scale.产妇产后应激量表中文版的翻译与验证。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):685. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05990-y.
10
Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the pancreatitis quality of life instrument (PANQOLI) in patients with chronic pancreatitis.中文版慢性胰腺炎生活质量测定量表(PANQOLI)的翻译与验证。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):3417-3426. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03479-x. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy.癫痫耻辱感量表中文版的效度验证
Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 7;13:796296. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.796296. eCollection 2022.
2
Self-Efficacy Intervention Programs in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Narrative Review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我效能干预方案:叙事性综述。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Dec 18;16:3397-3403. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S338720. eCollection 2021.
3
Self-efficacy, coping strategies and quality of life in women and men requiring assisted reproductive technology treatments for anatomical or non-anatomical infertility.
在需要接受辅助生殖技术治疗解剖或非解剖性不孕的女性和男性中,自我效能、应对策略和生活质量。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:241-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.027. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
Cross-cultural and psychometric property assessment of the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale in Chinese patients with spinal cord injury.中文版脊髓损伤患者穆龙自我效能量表的跨文化与心理测量学特性评估
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(19):5631-5637. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1939445. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
5
Perceived Social Support and Life Satisfaction in Infertile Women Undergoing Treatment: A Moderated Mediation Model.接受治疗的不孕女性的感知社会支持与生活满意度:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:651612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651612. eCollection 2021.
6
Health-related quality of life in youth with abdominal pain: An examination of optimism and pain self-efficacy.青少年腹痛与健康相关的生活质量:乐观和疼痛自我效能的检验。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Aug;147:110531. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110531. Epub 2021 May 24.
7
The analysis of fertility quality of life and the influencing factors of patients with repeated implantation failure.反复种植失败患者的生育质量分析及其影响因素。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 25;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01666-3.
8
Quality of life, social support and self-efficacy in women after a miscarriage.流产后妇女的生活质量、社会支持和自我效能感。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 7;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01662-z.
9
Social support, self-efficacy, cognitive coping and psychological distress in infertile women.不孕女性的社会支持、自我效能、认知应对和心理困扰。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;302(2):423-430. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05614-2. Epub 2020 May 26.
10
Enhancing validity through cognitive interviewing. A methodological example using the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Comfort Questionnaire.通过认知访谈提高有效性。以癫痫监测单元舒适度问卷为例的方法学示例。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jan;75(1):224-233. doi: 10.1111/jan.13867. Epub 2018 Nov 8.