Suppr超能文献

食用油中维生素A的定量分析:便携式设备iCheck Chroma3与高效液相色谱法的比较

Quantification of Vitamin A in Edible Oils: Comparison of Portable Device iCheck Chroma3 to High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

作者信息

Palma-Duran Susana A, Morgan David, Combet Emilie

机构信息

School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Department of Food Science, Research Center in Food and Development A.C., Hermosillo, Mexico.

出版信息

Food Anal Methods. 2024;17(6):847-854. doi: 10.1007/s12161-024-02613-w. Epub 2024 Mar 23.

Abstract

Fortification of edible oil with vitamin A is a widely adopted intervention to minimize the effects of vitamin A deficiency in vulnerable groups and mitigate some of its deleterious consequences. Regulatory monitoring is an important prerequisite to ensure that the fortification program is implemented effectively. Standard laboratory analysis methods for vitamin A in oils to assess adequate addition levels remain expensive and time-consuming. Portable testing devices are relatively less expensive in terms of capital investment and cost per test. However, the reliability of results needs to be assured to ensure acceptability and confidence. This study compared a portable device to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in terms of quantification of vitamin A in both spiked and commercially fortified oils. Nine oils (soybean, palm, cottonseed, rapeseed, corn, peanut, coconut, sunflower, and rice bran oils) were selected and spiked with retinyl palmitate at six different concentrations, and 112 commercially fortified oils were quantified for their vitamin A content using both methods. A good indicator of intra-day and inter-day repeatability (< 10% CV) was obtained for the measurement of vitamin A in the spiked oils for both methods, which denotes a high agreement between them. Vitamin A recoveries were 97-132% for HPLC and 74-127% for the portable device. A strong positive correlation,  = 0.88, is observed between the two methods for the quantification of vitamin A in the commercially fortified oils. The portable device provides a relatively low-cost, quick, and user-friendly alternative to HPLC.

摘要

食用油中添加维生素A是一种广泛采用的干预措施,旨在将弱势群体中维生素A缺乏的影响降至最低,并减轻其一些有害后果。监管监测是确保强化计划有效实施的重要前提。用于评估食用油中维生素A添加水平是否充足的标准实验室分析方法仍然昂贵且耗时。便携式检测设备在资本投资和每次检测成本方面相对较低。然而,需要确保结果的可靠性,以保证其可接受性和可信度。本研究在对加标油和市售强化油中的维生素A进行定量方面,将一种便携式设备与高效液相色谱法(HPLC)进行了比较。选择了九种油(大豆油、棕榈油、棉籽油、菜籽油、玉米油、花生油、椰子油、向日葵油和米糠油),并以六种不同浓度添加棕榈酸视黄酯,同时使用这两种方法对112种市售强化油的维生素A含量进行了定量。两种方法对加标油中维生素A的测量均获得了良好的日内和日间重复性指标(CV<10%),这表明它们之间具有高度一致性。HPLC法的维生素A回收率为97-132%,便携式设备的回收率为74-127%。两种方法对市售强化油中维生素A的定量之间观察到强正相关,r = 0.88。该便携式设备为HPLC提供了一种成本相对较低、快速且用户友好的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/002d/11101565/a2ca8eb48401/12161_2024_2613_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验