• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿片类药物治疗伴或不伴系统性自身免疫/炎症性风湿性疾病的成年人:2006-2019 年美国国家数据分析。

Opioid Treatment for Adults With and Without Systemic Autoimmune/Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Analysis of 2006-2019 United States National Data.

机构信息

The University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University, Mississippi.

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Oct;76(10):1427-1435. doi: 10.1002/acr.25378. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1002/acr.25378
PMID:38766880
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study compared opioid prescribing among ambulatory visits with systemic autoimmune/inflammatory rheumatic diseases (SARDs) or without and assessed factors associated with opioid prescribing in SARDs.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between 2006 and 2019. Adult (≥18 years) visits with a primary diagnosis of SARDs, including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus were included in the study. Opioid prescribing was compared between those with vs without SARDs using multivariable logistic regression accounting for the complex survey design and adjusting for predisposing, enabling, and need factors within Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Another multivariable logistic regression examined the predictors associated with opioid prescribing in SARDs.

RESULTS

Annually, an average of 5.20 million (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.58-6.82) visits were made for SARDs, whereas 780.14 million (95% CI 747.56-812.72) visits were made for non-SARDs. The SARDs group was more likely to be prescribed opioids (22.53%) than the non-SARDs group (9.83%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.65; 95% CI 1.68-4.18). Among the SARDs visits, patient age from 50 to 64 (aOR 1.95; 95% CI 1.05-3.65 relative to ages 18-49) and prescribing of glucocorticoids (aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.20-2.54) were associated with an increased odd of opioid prescribing, whereas private insurance relative to Medicare (aOR 0.50; 95% CI 0.31-0.82) was associated with a decreased odds of opioid prescribing.

CONCLUSION

Opioid prescribing in SARDs was higher compared to non-SARDs. Concerted efforts are needed to determine the appropriateness of opioid prescribing in SARDs.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了有和无系统性自身免疫/炎症性风湿病(SARDs)的门诊就诊患者的阿片类药物处方情况,并评估了 SARDs 患者中与阿片类药物处方相关的因素。

方法

本横断面研究使用了 2006 年至 2019 年期间的全国门诊医疗保健调查数据。研究纳入了有 SARDs(包括类风湿关节炎、强直性脊柱炎、银屑病关节炎或系统性红斑狼疮)主要诊断的成年(≥18 岁)就诊患者。使用多变量逻辑回归比较了 SARDs 患者与非 SARDs 患者的阿片类药物处方情况,该回归考虑了复杂的调查设计,并在 Andersen 健康服务使用行为模型内调整了倾向因素、促成因素和需要因素。另一个多变量逻辑回归分析了与 SARDs 患者阿片类药物处方相关的预测因素。

结果

平均每年有 520 万(95%置信区间 [CI] 358-682)次就诊是为了治疗 SARDs,而非 SARDs 的就诊次数为 7801.4 万(95% CI 747.56-812.72)。与非 SARDs 就诊者相比,SARDs 就诊者更有可能被开具阿片类药物处方(22.53%比 9.83%)(调整后的优势比[aOR] 2.65;95%CI 1.68-4.18)。在 SARDs 就诊中,年龄在 50-64 岁(与 18-49 岁相比,aOR 1.95;95%CI 1.05-3.65)和开具糖皮质激素(aOR 1.75;95%CI 1.20-2.54)与开具阿片类药物的几率增加相关,而与医疗保险相比,私人保险(aOR 0.50;95%CI 0.31-0.82)与开具阿片类药物的几率降低相关。

结论

与非 SARDs 就诊者相比,SARDs 就诊者的阿片类药物处方比例更高。需要共同努力确定 SARDs 中阿片类药物处方的适当性。

相似文献

1
Opioid Treatment for Adults With and Without Systemic Autoimmune/Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Analysis of 2006-2019 United States National Data.阿片类药物治疗伴或不伴系统性自身免疫/炎症性风湿性疾病的成年人:2006-2019 年美国国家数据分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Oct;76(10):1427-1435. doi: 10.1002/acr.25378. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
2
Annual trends in pain management modalities in patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune rheumatic diseases in the USA from 2007 to 2021: an administrative claims-based study.2007年至2021年美国新诊断自身免疫性风湿疾病患者疼痛管理方式的年度趋势:一项基于行政索赔的研究
Lancet Rheumatol. 2024 Aug;6(8):e518-e527. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00120-6. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
Opioid Prescribing Among Outpatients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.门诊类风湿关节炎患者的阿片类药物处方。
Pain Med. 2021 Oct 8;22(10):2224-2234. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab054.
4
Opioid Medications Prescribing and the Pain-Depression Dyad in Primary Care: Analysis of 2014-2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) Data.阿片类药物处方与初级保健中的疼痛-抑郁双重困境:对 2014-2015 年全国门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)数据的分析。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):614-618. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180311.
5
Trends in opioid prescribing and co-prescribing of sedative hypnotics for acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain: 2001-2010.2001 - 2010年急性和慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的阿片类药物处方及镇静催眠药联合处方趋势
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):885-92. doi: 10.1002/pds.3776. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
6
Time trends and prescribing patterns of opioid drugs in UK primary care patients with non-cancer pain: A retrospective cohort study.英国初级保健中患有非癌性疼痛的患者的阿片类药物的时间趋势和处方模式:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 15;17(10):e1003270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003270. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
National opioid prescribing trends in emergency departments by provider type: 2005-2015.全国范围内按提供者类型划分的急诊部门阿片类药物处方趋势:2005-2015 年。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1439-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.041. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Opioid prescribing patterns for non-malignant chronic pain for rural versus non-rural US adults: a population-based study using 2010 NAMCS data.美国农村与非农村成年人非恶性慢性疼痛的阿片类药物处方模式:一项基于2010年国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)数据的人群研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:563. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0563-8.
9
Increasing Rates of Opioid Prescriptions for Gastrointestinal Diseases in the United States.美国用于治疗胃肠道疾病的阿片类药物处方率不断上升。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr;116(4):796-807. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001052.
10
Determinants of Opioid Prescribing for Nonmalignant Chronic Pain in US Outpatient Settings.美国门诊环境中非恶性慢性疼痛的阿片类药物处方决定因素。
Pain Med. 2018 Mar 1;19(3):524-532. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx025.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological pain management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative literature review.类风湿关节炎患者的药物性疼痛管理:一篇叙述性文献综述
BMC Med. 2025 Jan 29;23(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03870-0.