• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄牙护理学生应对灾害的认知成熟度:初步培训贡献。

Cognitive maturity of Portuguese nursing students to intervene in disasters: initial training contribution.

机构信息

Escola Superior de Saúde da Cruz Vermelha Portuguesa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 May 20;58:e20230364. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0364en. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0364en
PMID:38767846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11105002/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand whether, from the perspective of coordinators/directors of nursing courses and nurses with skills in the field of disasters, nursing students have the necessary cognitive maturity to articulate the various dimensions inherent to the area of disasters, allowing efficient performance.

METHOD

A study with a qualitative methodological approach, based on inductive reasoning and rigorous phenomenon description, based on exploratory research.

RESULTS

Given the specificity and complexity of these phenomena, the inclusion of the disaster domain in the teaching-learning process, supporting valid knowledge construction and allowing the development and maturity of nursing students' cognitive processes, is crucial.

CONCLUSION

Currently, reduced technical-scientific training in the field of disasters in Portugal constitutes a barrier in the development of nursing students' cognitive maturity, impeding their ability to respond when faced with phenomena of this complexity.

摘要

目的

从护理课程协调员/主管和具备灾害领域技能的护士的角度出发,了解护理学生是否具有必要的认知成熟度,能够表达灾害领域内在的各个维度,从而实现高效的表现。

方法

这是一项基于归纳推理和严格现象描述的定性方法研究,属于探索性研究。

结果

鉴于这些现象的特殊性和复杂性,将灾害领域纳入教学过程中,支持有效的知识构建,并允许护理学生的认知过程发展和成熟,这是至关重要的。

结论

目前,葡萄牙灾害领域的技术-科学培训不足,这构成了护理学生认知成熟度发展的障碍,阻碍了他们在面对这种复杂性的现象时的应对能力。

相似文献

1
Cognitive maturity of Portuguese nursing students to intervene in disasters: initial training contribution.葡萄牙护理学生应对灾害的认知成熟度:初步培训贡献。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 May 20;58:e20230364. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0364en. eCollection 2024.
2
Profile of transversal skills of Nursing students to intervene in disaster situations.护理学生应对灾害情景的跨学科技能概况。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Jul 18;75(6):e20210760. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0760. eCollection 2022.
3
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
4
General nurse competencies in disaster: A delphi study.灾难中的普通护士能力:德尔菲研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104037. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104037. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
5
Nursing students' experiences and perceptions of learner-centred education in a disaster nursing course: A qualitative study.护理专业学生在灾难护理课程中对以学习者为中心的教育的体验和看法:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Aug;47:102829. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102829. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
6
Ethical Reasoning Debriefing in Disaster Simulations.灾难模拟中的伦理推理总结汇报
J Prof Nurs. 2019 Mar-Apr;35(2):124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
7
Interprofessional disaster exercises for undergraduate nursing students: a scoping review.本科护生跨专业灾难演练的研究进展:综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Dec 1;21(12):2281-2308. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00221.
8
Nursing Students' Competency to Attend Disaster Situations: A Study in Western Iran.护理学生应对灾害情景的能力:伊朗西部的一项研究。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Oct;16(5):2044-2048. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.263. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
9
The Effectiveness of Disaster Education for Undergraduate Nursing Students' Knowledge, Willingness, and Perceived Ability: An Evaluation Study.灾难教育对本科护理学生知识、意愿和感知能力的有效性:评估研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 8;18(19):10545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910545.
10
Responding to a simulated disaster in the virtual or live classroom: Is there a difference in BSN student learning?在虚拟或实景课堂中应对模拟灾害:BSN 学生的学习有何不同?
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Aug;55:103170. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103170. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Disaster Education for Undergraduate Nursing Students' Knowledge, Willingness, and Perceived Ability: An Evaluation Study.灾难教育对本科护理学生知识、意愿和感知能力的有效性:评估研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 8;18(19):10545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910545.
2
Undergraduate nursing students' resilience, challenges, and supports during corona virus pandemic.本科护生在冠状病毒大流行期间的韧性、挑战和支持。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Oct;30 Suppl 1:1407-1416. doi: 10.1111/inm.12896. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Development of resilience in nursing students: A systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis.护理学生韧性的培养:系统的定性评价和主题综合分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Nov;41:102621. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102621. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
4
Managing interpersonal conflict: Steps for success.管理人际冲突:成功的步骤。
Nurs Manage. 2019 Jun;50(6):22-28. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000558479.54449.ed.
5
Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines.可视化决策:跨学科的认知框架
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Jul 11;3:29. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0120-9. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
The Influences of Emotion on Learning and Memory.情绪对学习与记忆的影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 24;8:1454. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454. eCollection 2017.
7
Call to Action: The Case for Advancing Disaster Nursing Education in the United States.行动呼吁:推进美国灾害护理教育的理由。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Nov;49(6):688-696. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12338. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
8
Children's Critical Thinking When Learning From Others.儿童向他人学习时的批判性思维。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct 1;17(5):344-347. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00603.x.
9
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.