Urgency and Emergency Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital.
Unit of General Surgery I, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital, University of Pavia, Pavia.
Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):5071-5077. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001529.
Fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) has been extensively utilized to assess bowel perfusion in oncologic surgery. In the emergency setting, there are many situations in which bowel perfusion assessment is required. Large prospective studies or RCTs evaluating feasibility, safety and utility of ICG in the emergency setting are lacking. The primary aim is to assess the usefulness of ICG for evaluation of bowel perfusion in the emergency setting.
The manuscript was drafted following the recommendations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA). A systematic literature search was carried out through Pubmed, Scopus, and the ISI Web of Science. Assessment of included study using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS) was calculated. The meta-analysis was carried out in line with recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, and the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model was used to calculate effect sizes.
10 093 papers were identified. Eighty-four were reviewed in full-text, and 78 were excluded: 64 were case reports; 10 were reviews without original data; 2 were letters to the editor; and 2 contained unextractable data. Finally, six studies 22-27 were available for quality assessment and quantitative synthesis. The probability of reoperation using ICG fluorescence angiography resulted similar to the traditional assessment of bowel perfusion with a RD was -0.04 (95% CI: -0.147 to 0.060). The results were statistically significant P =0.029, although the heterogeneity was not negligible with a 59.9% of the I2 index. No small study effect or publication bias were found.
This first metanalysis on the use of IGC fluorescence for ischemic bowel disease showed that this methodology is a safe and feasible tool in the assessment of bowel perfusion in the emergency setting. This topic should be further investigated in high-quality studies.
吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光成像已广泛应用于评估肿瘤外科中的肠灌注。在急诊环境中,有许多情况下需要评估肠灌注。缺乏针对急诊环境中 ICG 的可行性、安全性和实用性进行评估的大型前瞻性研究或 RCT。主要目的是评估 ICG 在急诊环境中评估肠灌注的有用性。
本手稿是根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目(PRISMA)的建议起草的。通过 Pubmed、Scopus 和 ISI Web of Science 进行了系统的文献检索。使用非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)评估纳入研究的评估。荟萃分析按照 Cochrane 协作组和观察性研究荟萃分析指南的建议进行,使用 Mantel-Haenszel 随机效应模型计算效应大小。
确定了 10093 篇论文。对 84 篇全文进行了回顾,排除了 78 篇:64 篇为病例报告;10 篇为无原始数据的综述;2 篇为给编辑的信;2 篇包含不可提取的数据。最后,有 6 项研究 22-27 项可用于质量评估和定量综合。使用 ICG 荧光血管造影术进行再次手术的概率与传统肠灌注评估结果相似,RD 为 -0.04(95%CI:-0.147 至 0.060)。结果具有统计学意义(P=0.029),尽管 I2 指数为 59.9%,存在不可忽视的异质性。未发现小样本效应或发表偏倚。
这项关于 ICG 荧光在缺血性肠病中的应用的首次荟萃分析表明,这种方法在评估急诊环境中的肠灌注方面是一种安全可行的工具。这个主题应该在高质量的研究中进一步研究。