Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2024 Jun 17;37(6):1000-1010. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00088. Epub 2024 May 20.
Electronic cigarette smoking (or vaping) is on the rise, presenting questions about the effects of secondhand exposure. The chemical composition of vape emissions was examined in the exhaled breath of eight human volunteers with the high chemical specificity of complementary online and offline techniques. Our study is the first to take multiple exhaled puff measurements from human participants and compare volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations between two commonly used methods, proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS) and gas chromatography (GC). Five flavor profile groups were selected for this study, but flavor compounds were not observed as the main contributors to the PTR-ToF-MS signal. Instead, the PTR-ToF-MS mass spectra were overwhelmed by e-liquid thermal decomposition and fragmentation products, which masked other observations regarding flavorings and other potentially toxic species associated with secondhand vape exposure. Compared to the PTR-ToF-MS, GC measurements reported significantly different VOC concentrations, usually below those from PTR-ToF-MS. Consequently, PTR-ToF-MS mass spectra should be interpreted with caution when reporting results in vaping studies, such as doses of inhaled VOCs. Nevertheless, the online PTR-ToF-MS analysis can provide valuable information by comparing relative VOCs in back-to-back trials. For example, by comparing the mass spectra of exhaled air with those of direct puffs, we can conclude that harmful VOCs present in the vape emissions are largely absorbed by the participants, including large fractions of nicotine.
电子烟吸烟(或蒸气)呈上升趋势,引发了关于二手烟暴露影响的问题。我们使用互补的在线和离线技术的高度化学特异性,研究了八种人类志愿者呼出的蒸气排放物的化学成分。我们的研究首次从人类参与者中进行了多次呼出烟雾测量,并比较了两种常用方法(质子转移反应飞行时间质谱(PTR-ToF-MS)和气相色谱(GC))之间的挥发性有机化合物(VOC)浓度。选择了五个风味轮廓组进行这项研究,但由于风味化合物不是 PTR-ToF-MS 信号的主要贡献者,因此并未观察到风味化合物。相反,PTR-ToF-MS 质谱被电子液体热分解和碎片产物所淹没,从而掩盖了与二手蒸气暴露有关的其他观察结果,例如调味剂和其他潜在有毒物质。与 PTR-ToF-MS 相比,GC 测量报告的 VOC 浓度明显不同,通常低于 PTR-ToF-MS 的浓度。因此,在报告蒸气研究结果(例如吸入的 VOC 剂量)时,应谨慎解释 PTR-ToF-MS 质谱。尽管如此,在线 PTR-ToF-MS 分析通过比较背对背试验中的相对 VOC 仍可以提供有价值的信息。例如,通过比较呼出空气的质谱与直接吸烟的质谱,我们可以得出结论,蒸气排放物中存在的有害 VOC 很大程度上被参与者吸收,包括尼古丁的很大一部分。