• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identifying barriers and benefits of patient safety event reporting toward user-centered design.识别患者安全事件报告在以用户为中心的设计方面的障碍和益处。
Saf Health. 2015;1:7. doi: 10.1186/2056-5917-1-7. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
2
Patient Safety Learning Systems: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.患者安全学习系统:系统评价与定性综合分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 Mar 1;17(3):1-23. eCollection 2017.
3
Toward User-Centered Patient Safety Event Reporting System: A Trial of Text Prediction in Clinical Data Entry.迈向以用户为中心的患者安全事件报告系统:临床数据录入中的文本预测试验。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:188-92.
4
Linking Activity Theory Within User-Centered Design: Novel Framework to Inform Design and Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems in Pharmacy.将活动理论与以用户为中心的设计相结合:为药房药物不良反应报告系统的设计和评估提供信息的新框架。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Feb 24;10:e43529. doi: 10.2196/43529.
5
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
6
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
7
Barriers to implementing patient safety incident reporting and learning guidelines in specialised care units, KwaZulu-Natal: A qualitative study.在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的专业护理病房实施患者安全事件报告和学习指南的障碍:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0289857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289857. eCollection 2024.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Enhancing Patient Safety Event Reporting. A Systematic Review of System Design Features.加强患者安全事件报告:系统设计特征的系统评价
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Aug 30;8(3):893-909. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-02-R-0023.
10
House Staff Participation in Patient Safety Reporting: Identification of Predominant Barriers and Implementation of a Pilot Program.住院医师参与患者安全报告:主要障碍的识别与试点项目的实施。
South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):395-400. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000486.

引用本文的文献

1
A large dataset of annotated incident reports on medication errors.一个大型的带注释的药物错误事故报告数据集。
Sci Data. 2024 Feb 29;11(1):260. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03036-2.
2
A Machine Learning Approach with Human-AI Collaboration for Automated Classification of Patient Safety Event Reports: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.一种人机协作的机器学习方法用于患者安全事件报告的自动分类:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jan 25;11:e53378. doi: 10.2196/53378.
3
Using Community Detection Techniques to Identify Themes in COVID-19-Related Patient Safety Event Reports.运用社区发现技术识别 COVID-19 相关患者安全事件报告中的主题。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Dec 1;18(8):e1196-e1202. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001051. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Accident & Emergency Informatics and One Digital Health.急症与急救信息学和数字化健康
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):40-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742506. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
5
How do healthcare practitioners use incident data to improve patient safety in Japan? A qualitative study.医疗保健从业者如何利用事件数据来提高日本的患者安全?一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 22;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07631-0.
6
Assessment of patient safety challenges and electronic occurrence variance reporting (e-OVR) barriers facing physicians and nurses in the emergency department: a cross sectional study.急诊科医生和护士面临的患者安全挑战及电子事件差异报告(e-OVR)障碍评估:一项横断面研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00391-2.
7
Practical and Cultural Barriers to Reporting Incidents Among Health Workers in Indonesian Public Hospitals.印度尼西亚公立医院医护人员上报事件的实际与文化障碍
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Apr 3;13:351-359. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S240124. eCollection 2020.
8
Analysis of Patient Safety Incident reporting system as an indicator of quality nursing in critical care units in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省重症监护病房患者安全事件报告系统作为护理质量指标的分析
Health SA. 2020 Mar 31;25:1263. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v25i0.1263. eCollection 2020.
9
Toward Reporting Support and Quality Assessment for Learning from Reporting: A Necessary Data Elements Model for Narrative Medication Error Reports.迈向学习报告的报告支持与质量评估:叙事性用药错误报告的必要数据元素模型
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1581-1590. eCollection 2018.
10
Survey to identify depth of penetration of critical incident reporting systems in Austrian healthcare facilities.关于确定奥地利医疗机构中重大事件报告系统渗透深度的调查。
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958017744919. doi: 10.1177/0046958017744919.

本文引用的文献

1
A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care.一项新的、基于证据的医院护理相关患者伤害评估。
J Patient Saf. 2013 Sep;9(3):122-8. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a69.
2
Identifying, understanding and overcoming barriers to medication error reporting in hospitals: a focus group study.识别、理解和克服医院药物错误报告障碍:一项焦点小组研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 May;21(5):361-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000299. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
3
Data consistency in a voluntary medical incident reporting system.自愿医疗事故报告系统中的数据一致性。
J Med Syst. 2011 Aug;35(4):609-15. doi: 10.1007/s10916-009-9398-y. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
4
Conceptualising barriers to incident reporting: a psychological framework.概念化事件报告的障碍:一个心理学框架。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e60. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.030445. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
5
Factors determining hospital nurses' failures in reporting medication errors in Taiwan.影响台湾地区医院护士报告用药错误的因素。
Nurs Outlook. 2010 Jan-Feb;58(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2009.06.001.
6
Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety.事件报告的反馈:用于提高患者安全的信息与行动
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):11-21. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024166.
7
Does error and adverse event reporting by physicians and nurses differ?医生和护士的错误及不良事件报告有差异吗?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Sep;34(9):537-45. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34068-9.
8
A review of medical error reporting system design considerations and a proposed cross-level systems research framework.医学错误报告系统设计考量综述及一个拟议的跨层次系统研究框架。
Hum Factors. 2007 Apr;49(2):257-76. doi: 10.1518/001872007X312487.
9
Results of a survey on medical error reporting systems in Korean hospitals.韩国医院医疗差错报告系统的调查结果。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Feb;75(2):148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.005. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
10
The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events.联合委员会国际医疗卫生机构认证联合委员会患者安全事件分类法:一种针对未遂失误和不良事件的标准化术语及分类架构。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Apr;17(2):95-105. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi021. Epub 2005 Feb 21.

识别患者安全事件报告在以用户为中心的设计方面的障碍和益处。

Identifying barriers and benefits of patient safety event reporting toward user-centered design.

作者信息

Gong Yang, Song Hsing-Yi, Wu Xinshuo, Hua Lei

机构信息

School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin St. Suite 165, Houston 77030, TX, USA.

出版信息

Saf Health. 2015;1:7. doi: 10.1186/2056-5917-1-7. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1186/2056-5917-1-7
PMID:38770193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11105152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To learn from errors, electronic patient safety event reporting systems (e-reporting systems) have been widely adopted to collect medical incidents from the frontline practitioners in US hospitals. However, two issues of underreporting and low-quality of reports pervade and thus the system effectiveness remains dubious.

METHODS

This study employing semi-structured interviews of health professionals in the Texas Medical Center investigated the perceived benefits and barriers from users who have used e-reporting systems.

RESULTS

As a result, the perceived benefits include the enhanced convenience in data processing and the assistant functions leading to patient safety enhancement. The perceived barriers to the acceptance and quality use of the system include the lack of instructions, lack of reporter-friendly classifications, lack of time, and lack of feedback The identified benefits and barriers help design a user-centered e-reporting system where learning and assistant features are discussed during the interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

As a response, the learning and assistant features aiming at enhancing benefits and removing barriers of e-reporting systems should be included for facilitating the acceptance and effective use of the systems.

摘要

背景

为了从错误中吸取教训,电子患者安全事件报告系统(电子报告系统)已被广泛采用,以收集美国医院一线从业者的医疗事件。然而,漏报和报告质量低这两个问题普遍存在,因此该系统的有效性仍然存疑。

方法

本研究对德克萨斯医疗中心的卫生专业人员进行了半结构化访谈,调查了使用电子报告系统的用户所感知到的益处和障碍。

结果

结果显示,感知到的益处包括数据处理便利性增强以及有助于提高患者安全的辅助功能。该系统在接受度和高质量使用方面所感知到的障碍包括缺乏说明、缺乏对报告者友好的分类、缺乏时间以及缺乏反馈。在访谈中确定的益处和障碍有助于设计一个以用户为中心的电子报告系统,其中学习和辅助功能得到了讨论。

结论

作为应对措施,应纳入旨在增强电子报告系统的益处并消除其障碍的学习和辅助功能,以促进该系统的接受度和有效使用。