Slovak Petr, Munson Sean A
King's College London, London, UK.
University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2024 May;2024. doi: 10.1145/3613904.3642624. Epub 2024 May 11.
Many people prefer psychosocial interventions for mental health care or other concerns, but these interventions are often complex and unavailable in settings where people seek care. Intervention designers use technology to improve user experience or reach of interventions, and HCI researchers have made many contributions toward this goal. Both HCI and mental health researchers must navigate tensions between innovating on and adhering to the theories of change that guide intervention design. In this paper, we propose a framework that describes design briefs and evaluation approaches for HCI contributions at the scopes of capabilities, components, intervention systems, and intervention implementations. We show how theories of change (from mental health) can be translated into design briefs (in HCI), and that these translations can bridge and coordinate efforts across fields. It is our hope that this framework can support researchers in motivating, planning, conducting, and communicating work that advances psychosocial intervention design.
许多人倾向于采用社会心理干预措施来进行心理健康护理或解决其他问题，但这些干预措施往往很复杂，而且在人们寻求护理的场所难以获得。干预措施设计者利用技术来改善用户体验或扩大干预措施的覆盖范围，人机交互（HCI）研究人员也为实现这一目标做出了许多贡献。HCI研究人员和心理健康研究人员都必须应对在创新和遵循指导干预措施设计的变革理论之间的紧张关系。在本文中，我们提出了一个框架，该框架描述了在能力、组件、干预系统和干预实施等范围内HCI贡献的设计简报和评估方法。我们展示了变革理论（来自心理健康领域）如何转化为（HCI领域的）设计简报，并且这些转化能够在不同领域之间搭建桥梁并协调各方努力。我们希望这个框架能够支持研究人员开展激励、规划、实施以及交流推进社会心理干预设计的工作。
