• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时与序贯分次二氧化碳激光联合皮下分离术治疗痤疮后萎缩性瘢痕:一项半脸对照研究。

Simultaneous versus sequential fractional CO laser and subcision combination for management of post-acne atrophic scars: A split-face comparative study.

作者信息

Tran Bao Quoc, Tran Tu Nguyen Anh, Doan Em Van Loi, Nguyen Thuy Thi Phan, Nguyen Hao Trong

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Ho Chi Minh City Hospital of Dermato-Venereology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Department of Dermatology, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Oct;23(10):3210-3221. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16395. Epub 2024 May 21.

DOI:10.1111/jocd.16395
PMID:38770894
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A combination of fractional CO laser and subcision is usually employed for the treatment of post-acne atrophic scars. However, the efficacy and safety of both simultaneous and sequential combination therapies should be explored.

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of simultaneous and sequential fractional CO laser and subcision combination therapies for post-acne atrophic scars.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-blind, split-face clinical trial included 34 patients with post-acne atrophic scars at our institution. Each patient underwent three sessions of subcision combined with fractional CO laser, with a 1-month interval between each session. The left side of the face was treated with simultaneous combination therapy, whereas the right side was treated with sequential combination therapy. Treatment efficacy was assessed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks; and 3 and 6 months after the last session.

RESULTS

Simultaneous and sequential treatments demonstrated comparable efficacy. Regarding the adverse events, the side of the face undergoing simultaneous treatment experienced longer swelling duration, higher pain levels during laser treatment, and shorter downtime.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the longer swelling time and higher pain levels during laser treatment in the simultaneous treatment side, the effectiveness and satisfaction level of the CO fractional laser and subcision for treatment of the acne scars were comparable between the two combinations, with a shorter downtime for the simultaneous than for the sequential combination therapy.

摘要

背景

剥脱性二氧化碳激光与皮下分离术联合应用常用于治疗痤疮后萎缩性瘢痕。然而,同时联合治疗和序贯联合治疗的疗效和安全性均有待探索。

目的

比较同时联合和序贯联合剥脱性二氧化碳激光与皮下分离术治疗痤疮后萎缩性瘢痕的疗效和安全性。

患者和方法

本单盲、半脸临床试验纳入了我院34例痤疮后萎缩性瘢痕患者。每位患者接受3次皮下分离术联合剥脱性二氧化碳激光治疗,每次治疗间隔1个月。面部左侧采用同时联合治疗,右侧采用序贯联合治疗。在第4、8、12周以及最后一次治疗后3个月和6个月评估治疗效果。

结果

同时联合治疗和序贯联合治疗疗效相当。在不良事件方面,接受同时联合治疗的一侧面部肿胀持续时间更长,激光治疗时疼痛程度更高,但恢复时间更短。

结论

尽管同时联合治疗一侧在激光治疗期间肿胀时间更长、疼痛程度更高,但两种联合治疗方式在治疗痤疮瘢痕方面,二氧化碳剥脱性激光与皮下分离术的有效性和满意度相当,同时联合治疗的恢复时间比序贯联合治疗更短。

相似文献

1
Simultaneous versus sequential fractional CO laser and subcision combination for management of post-acne atrophic scars: A split-face comparative study.同时与序贯分次二氧化碳激光联合皮下分离术治疗痤疮后萎缩性瘢痕:一项半脸对照研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Oct;23(10):3210-3221. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16395. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
A combined subcision approach with either fractional CO laser (10,600 nm) or cross-linked hyaluronic acid versus subcision alone in atrophic post-acne scar treatment.联合切开术联合应用或不联合应用分段 CO2 激光(10,600nm)或交联透明质酸治疗痤疮后萎缩性瘢痕。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 24;38(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03677-y.
3
PDO screw threads versus fractional CO laser, after subcision, for atrophic acne scar remodelling: a randomized group-based comparative study.在皮下分离术后,用于萎缩性痤疮瘢痕重塑的聚对二氧环己酮螺钉螺纹与分数二氧化碳激光:一项基于随机分组的比较研究。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Jan 13;317(1):236. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03727-1.
4
Treatment of atrophic acne scars using autologous platelet-rich plasma vs combined subcision and autologous platelet-rich plasma: A split-face comparative study.采用自体富血小板血浆与联合皮下分离术和自体富血小板血浆治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕:一项对照性分面研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Feb;19(2):456-461. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13048. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
5
Effectiveness of subcision using carboxytherapy plus fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: comparative split face study.羧基治疗联合分次二氧化碳激光磨皮皮下分离术治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的疗效:对比性半脸研究
J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 May;31(3):296-299. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1595505. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
6
Subdermal Laser-Assisted Scar Subcision (SLASS) Combined With Fractional CO Laser for Acne Scars: Efficacy Evaluation.皮下激光辅助瘢痕切除术(SLASS)联合分次二氧化碳激光治疗痤疮瘢痕:疗效评估
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 May;24(5):e70219. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70219.
7
Comparison of multiple 1565 nm fractional Er: glass laser and single fractional CO laser in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: a prospective, randomized split-face study.1565纳米多脉冲铒玻璃激光与单脉冲二氧化碳激光治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的比较:一项前瞻性随机半脸研究
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2025 Feb 17;27(1-2):17-23. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2025.2459629. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
8
Simultaneous versus stepwise treatment of acne and atrophic scars: a prospective split-face controlled trial.痤疮与萎缩性瘢痕的同步治疗与分步治疗:一项前瞻性半脸对照试验。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Apr 29;317(1):742. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04201-2.
9
Comparative study of the efficacy of Platelet-rich plasma combined with carboxytherapy vs its use with fractional carbon dioxide laser in atrophic acne scars.富血小板血浆联合羧基治疗与联合分次二氧化碳激光治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的疗效比较研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Feb;18(1):150-155. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12561. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
10
Fractional CO2 laser with topical insulin versus PRP for atrophic acne scars: a randomized split-face study.二氧化碳分次激光联合外用胰岛素与富血小板血浆治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的随机半脸对照研究
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Apr 1;317(1):663. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04112-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clinical effects and patient satisfaction between ultra-pulsed CO₂ laser treatment and surgical excision in patients with facial basal cell carcinoma.超脉冲二氧化碳激光治疗与手术切除治疗面部基底细胞癌患者的临床效果及患者满意度比较
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 14;12:1628257. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1628257. eCollection 2025.