Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 May 1;65(5):33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.5.33.
This study explored early (contrast discrimination) and intermediate (global form perception) visual processing in primary subtypes of glaucoma: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). We aimed to understand early and intermediate visual processing in POAG and PACG, matched for similar visual field defect severity.
Early visual processing was measured using a contrast discrimination task described by Porkorny and Smith (1997), and intermediate processing using a global form perception task using glass pattern coherence thresholds. Thresholds were determined centrally and at a single midperipheral location (12.5°) in a quadrant without visual field defects. Controls were tested in corresponding quadrants to individuals with glaucoma.
Sixty participants (20 POAG, 20 PACG, and 20 age-matched controls), aged 50 to 77 years, were included. Visual field defects were matched between POAG and PACG, with mean deviation values of -6.53 ± 4.46 (range: -1.5 to -16.85) dB and -6.2 ± 4.24 (range: -1.37 to -16.42) dB, respectively. Two-Way ANOVA revealed significant differences in thresholds between the glaucoma groups and the control group for both contrast discrimination and global form perception tasks, with higher thresholds in the glaucoma groups. Post hoc analyses showed no significant contrast discrimination difference between POAG and PACG, but POAG had significantly higher thresholds than PACG for form perception.
In form perception, POAG showed slightly worse performance than PACG, suggesting that individuals with POAG may experience more severe functional damage than PACG of similar visual field severity.
本研究旨在探讨原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)和原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)这两种主要青光眼亚型的早期(对比敏感度)和中期(整体形态感知)视觉处理。我们旨在了解 POAG 和 PACG 中早期和中期的视觉处理,这些患者的视野缺损严重程度相似。
使用 Porkorny 和 Smith(1997)描述的对比度辨别任务来测量早期视觉处理,使用玻璃模式相干阈值的整体形态感知任务来测量中期处理。阈值在中央和单个中周位置(12.5°)进行确定,该位置在没有视野缺损的象限中。对照组在与青光眼患者相对应的象限中进行测试。
共纳入 60 名参与者(20 名 POAG、20 名 PACG 和 20 名年龄匹配的对照组),年龄在 50 至 77 岁之间。POAG 和 PACG 之间的视野缺损相匹配,平均偏差值分别为-6.53±4.46(范围:-1.5 至-16.85)dB 和-6.2±4.24(范围:-1.37 至-16.42)dB。双因素方差分析显示,在对比度辨别和整体形态感知任务中,青光眼组与对照组之间的阈值存在显著差异,青光眼组的阈值较高。事后分析显示,POAG 和 PACG 之间在对比度辨别方面没有显著差异,但在形态感知方面,POAG 的阈值明显高于 PACG。
在形态感知方面,POAG 的表现略逊于 PACG,这表明视野严重程度相似的 POAG 患者可能比 PACG 患者经历更严重的功能损伤。