• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者个体化结局:SIBILLA 项目。

Artificial intelligence to predict individualized outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients: The SIBILLA project.

机构信息

Unit of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Real World Data Facility, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Stroke J. 2024 Dec;9(4):1053-1062. doi: 10.1177/23969873241253366. Epub 2024 May 22.

DOI:10.1177/23969873241253366
PMID:38778480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569556/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Formulating reliable prognosis for ischemic stroke patients remains a challenging task. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence model able to formulate in the first 24 h after stroke an individualized prognosis in terms of NIHSS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven hundred ninety four acute ischemic stroke patients were divided into a training (597) and testing (197) cohort. Clinical and instrumental data were collected in the first 24 h. We evaluated the performance of four machine-learning models (Random Forest, -Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, XGBoost) in predicting NIHSS at discharge both in terms of variation between discharge and admission (regressor approach) and in terms of severity class namely NIHSS 0-5, 6-10, 11-20, >20 (classifier approach). We used Shapley Additive exPlanations values to weight features impact on predictions.

RESULTS

XGBoost emerged as the best performing model. The classifier and regressor approaches perform similarly in terms of accuracy (80% vs 75%) and f1-score (79% vs 77%) respectively. However, the regressor has higher precision (85% vs 68%) in predicting prognosis of very severe stroke patients (NIHSS > 20). NIHSS at admission and 24 hours, GCS at 24 hours, heart rate, acute ischemic lesion on CT-scan and TICI score were the most impacting features on the prediction.

DISCUSSION

Our approach, which employs an artificial intelligence based-tool, inherently able to continuously learn and improve its performance, could improve care pathway and support stroke physicians in the communication with patients and caregivers.

CONCLUSION

XGBoost reliably predicts individualized outcome in terms of NIHSS at discharge in the first 24 hours after stroke.

摘要

简介

为缺血性脑卒中患者制定可靠的预后仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。我们旨在开发一种人工智能模型,能够在脑卒中后 24 小时内制定 NIHSS 个体化预后。

患者和方法

794 例急性缺血性脑卒中患者分为训练(597 例)和测试(197 例)队列。在 24 小时内收集临床和仪器数据。我们评估了四种机器学习模型(随机森林、最近邻、支持向量机、XGBoost)在预测出院时 NIHSS 方面的性能,包括出院时和入院时之间的变化(回归器方法)以及严重程度类别(NIHSS 0-5、6-10、11-20、>20)(分类器方法)。我们使用 Shapley Additive exPlanations 值来加权特征对预测的影响。

结果

XGBoost 是表现最好的模型。分类器和回归器方法在准确性(80%对 75%)和 f1 分数(79%对 77%)方面表现相似。然而,回归器在预测非常严重的脑卒中患者(NIHSS>20)的预后方面具有更高的精度(85%对 68%)。入院时和 24 小时的 NIHSS、24 小时的 GCS、心率、CT 扫描上的急性缺血性病变和 TICI 评分是对预测影响最大的特征。

讨论

我们的方法采用人工智能为基础的工具,能够不断学习和提高性能,这可能会改善护理路径,并为脑卒中医生与患者和护理人员的沟通提供支持。

结论

XGBoost 能够可靠地预测脑卒中后 24 小时内 NIHSS 个体化预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/36f399da23c0/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/86793a9823b2/10.1177_23969873241253366-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/967f459a1847/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/8402f8525167/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/09831f496494/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/91bedacca1a4/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/36f399da23c0/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/86793a9823b2/10.1177_23969873241253366-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/967f459a1847/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/8402f8525167/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/09831f496494/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/91bedacca1a4/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd8/11585016/36f399da23c0/10.1177_23969873241253366-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence to predict individualized outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients: The SIBILLA project.人工智能预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者个体化结局:SIBILLA 项目。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Dec;9(4):1053-1062. doi: 10.1177/23969873241253366. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
Predicting stroke severity of patients using interpretable machine learning algorithms.使用可解释的机器学习算法预测患者的中风严重程度。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Nov 14;29(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02147-1.
3
Predicting 3-month poor functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke in young patients using machine learning.使用机器学习预测年轻急性缺血性脑卒中患者 3 个月的不良功能结局。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Oct 10;29(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02056-3.
4
Prediction of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Large-Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: Performance of Machine Learning versus SPAN-100.大血管急性缺血性脑卒中患者临床结局的预测:机器学习与 SPAN-100 的性能比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jan;42(2):240-246. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6918. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
Predictive models for secondary epilepsy in patients with acute ischemic stroke within one year.一年内急性缺血性脑卒中患者继发癫痫的预测模型。
Elife. 2024 Nov 14;13:RP98759. doi: 10.7554/eLife.98759.
6
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Influential Factors of Early Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Registry-Based Study.用于预测急性缺血性卒中早期预后影响因素的机器学习模型:基于登记处的研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Mar 25;10(3):e32508. doi: 10.2196/32508.
7
From Admission to Discharge: Predicting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Progression in Stroke Patients Using Biomarkers and Explainable Machine Learning.从入院到出院:使用生物标志物和可解释机器学习预测中风患者的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表进展情况
J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 14;13(9):1375. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091375.
8
Machine learning is an effective method to predict the 90-day prognosis of patients with transient ischemic attack and minor stroke.机器学习是预测短暂性脑缺血发作和小卒中患者 90 天预后的有效方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 16;22(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01672-z.
9
Utilizing imaging parameters for functional outcome prediction in acute ischemic stroke: A machine learning study.利用成像参数预测急性缺血性卒中的功能转归:一项机器学习研究。
J Neuroimaging. 2024 May-Jun;34(3):356-365. doi: 10.1111/jon.13194. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
10
Developing machine learning models to predict multi-class functional outcomes and death three months after stroke in Sweden.开发机器学习模型预测瑞典卒中后三个月的多类功能结局和死亡。
PLoS One. 2024 May 13;19(5):e0303287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303287. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of 1-Year Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Hierarchical Machine Learning Approach.系统性红斑狼疮1年活动度的预测:分层机器学习方法
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 22;9:e70200. doi: 10.2196/70200.
2
Towards Transforming Neurorehabilitation: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurological Disorders.迈向变革性神经康复:人工智能对神经系统疾病诊断和治疗的影响。
Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 21;12(10):2415. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102415.
3
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and reproducibility in stroke research.

本文引用的文献

1
Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: a World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission.减少全球卒中负担的务实解决方案:世界卒中组织-柳叶刀神经病学委员会。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 Dec;22(12):1160-1206. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00277-6. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
2
Deep Learning Versus Neurologists: Functional Outcome Prediction in LVO Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy.深度学习与神经科医生:接受机械取栓的 LVO 卒中患者的功能预后预测。
Stroke. 2023 Jul;54(7):1761-1769. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.042496. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
Ordinal Prediction Model of 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale in Ischemic Stroke.
人工智能、机器学习与中风研究的可重复性
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep;9(3):518-520. doi: 10.1177/23969873241275863.
缺血性卒中90天改良Rankin量表的序贯预测模型
Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 22;12:727171. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.727171. eCollection 2021.
4
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):I-LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
Reliability and Clinical Utility of Machine Learning to Predict Stroke Prognosis: Comparison with Logistic Regression.机器学习预测卒中预后的可靠性及临床实用性:与逻辑回归的比较
J Stroke. 2020 Sep;22(3):403-406. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.02537. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
From Real-World Patient Data to Individualized Treatment Effects Using Machine Learning: Current and Future Methods to Address Underlying Challenges.从真实世界的患者数据到使用机器学习实现个体化治疗效果:解决潜在挑战的当前和未来方法。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;109(1):87-100. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1907. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
7
Economic burden of stroke across Europe: A population-based cost analysis.欧洲中风的经济负担:基于人群的成本分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2020 Mar;5(1):17-25. doi: 10.1177/2396987319883160. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
8
Evaluation of machine learning methods to stroke outcome prediction using a nationwide disease registry.利用全国性疾病登记系统评估机器学习方法对脑卒中结局的预测。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Jul;190:105381. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105381. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
9
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: An Alternative Primary Outcome Measure for Trials of Acute Treatment for Ischemic Stroke.国立卫生研究院卒中量表:急性缺血性脑卒中治疗试验的替代主要结局指标。
Stroke. 2020 Jan;51(1):282-290. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026791. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
10
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.