Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb-Mar;41(1-2):51-69. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2024.2315831. Epub 2024 May 22.
How does cognitive inhibition influence speaking? The Stroop effect is a classic demonstration of the interference between reading and color naming. We used a novel variant of the Stroop task to measure whether this interference impacts not only the response speed, but also the acoustic properties of speech. Speakers named the color of words in three categories: congruent (e.g., written in red), color-incongruent (e.g., written in red), and vowel-incongruent - those with partial phonological overlap with their color (e.g., written in red, in green, and in blue). Our primary aim was to identify any effect of the distractor vowel on the acoustics of the target vowel. Participants were no slower to respond on vowel-incongruent trials, but formant trajectories tended to show a bias away from the distractor vowel, consistent with a phenomenon of that increases contrast between confusable alternatives.
认知抑制如何影响说话?斯特鲁普效应是阅读和颜色命名之间干扰的经典范例。我们使用了一种新的斯特鲁普任务变体来衡量这种干扰是否不仅会影响反应速度,还会影响语音的声学特性。说话者会说出三类单词的颜色:一致(例如, 用红色书写)、不一致(例如, 用红色书写)和元音不一致——那些与颜色有部分语音重叠的单词(例如, 用红色书写, 用绿色书写, 用蓝色书写)。我们的主要目的是确定干扰元音对目标元音的声学特性的任何影响。参与者在元音不一致的试验中并没有反应得更慢,但共振峰轨迹往往偏向于远离干扰元音,这与增加可混淆选项之间对比度的 现象一致。