Torgersen Leanne N S, Schulz Stefan M, Lugo Ricardo G, Sütterlin Stefan
Department of Behavioural Medicine and Principles of Human Biology for the Health Sciences, Trier University, Germany.
Estonian Maritime Academy, Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May 23;3(5):e0000507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000507. eCollection 2024 May.
Advancements in digitalisation with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) allow patients opportunities for improved autonomy, quality of life, and a potential increase in life expectancy. However, with the digital and functional practicalities of CIEDs, there exists also cyber safety issues with transferring wireless information. If a digital network were to be hacked, a CIED patient could experience both the loss of sensitive data and the loss of functional control of the CIED due to an unwelcome party. Moreover, if a CIED patient were to become victim of a cyber attack, which resulted in a serious or lethal event, and if this information were to become public, the trust in healthcare would be impacted and legal consequences could result. A cyber attack therefore poses not only a direct threat to the patient's health but also the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the CIED, and these cyber threats could be considered "patient-targeted threats." Informed consent is a key component of ethical care, legally concordant practice, and promoting patient-as-partner therapeutic relationships [1]. To date, there are no standardised guidelines for listing cybersecurity risks within the informed consent or for discussing them during the consent process. Providers are responsible for adhering to the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, both in medical practice generally and the informed consent process specifically. At present, the decision to include cybersecurity risks is mainly left to the provider's discretion, who may also have limited cyber risk information. Without effective and in-depth communication about all possible cybersecurity risks during the consent process, CIED patients can be left unaware of the privacy and physical risks they possess by carrying such a device. Therefore, cyber risk factors should be covered within the patients' informed consent and reviewed on an ongoing basis as new risk information becomes available. By including cyber risk information in the informed consent process, patients are given the autonomy to make the best-informed decision.
心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)数字化的进步为患者提供了提高自主性、生活质量以及潜在延长预期寿命的机会。然而,鉴于CIED的数字和功能实用性,在无线信息传输方面也存在网络安全问题。如果数字网络被黑客攻击,CIED患者可能会因不受欢迎的一方而遭受敏感数据丢失以及CIED功能控制丧失的情况。此外,如果CIED患者成为网络攻击的受害者,导致严重或致命事件,并且如果此信息公开,对医疗保健的信任将受到影响并可能产生法律后果。因此,网络攻击不仅对患者健康构成直接威胁,还对CIED的保密性、完整性和可用性构成威胁,这些网络威胁可被视为“针对患者的威胁”。知情同意是道德护理、合法合规实践以及促进医患合作治疗关系的关键组成部分[1]。迄今为止,在知情同意书中列出网络安全风险或在同意过程中进行讨论尚无标准化指南。医疗服务提供者有责任在一般医疗实践中,特别是在知情同意过程中,遵守自主、有益、无害和公正的道德原则。目前,是否纳入网络安全风险的决定主要由医疗服务提供者自行决定,而他们可能掌握的网络风险信息也有限。在同意过程中,如果没有就所有可能的网络安全风险进行有效且深入的沟通,CIED患者可能意识不到携带此类设备所带来的隐私和身体风险。因此,网络风险因素应涵盖在患者的知情同意书中,并随着新的风险信息出现持续进行审查。通过在知情同意过程中纳入网络风险信息,患者能够自主做出最明智的决定。