• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为期一天的青少年边缘型人格障碍良好精神科管理(GPM-A)工作坊的影响。

The Impact of a One-Day Workshop on Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescent (GPM-A) Borderline Personality Disorder.

机构信息

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Boston Child Study Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Acad Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;48(4):346-350. doi: 10.1007/s40596-024-01984-w. Epub 2024 May 23.

DOI:10.1007/s40596-024-01984-w
PMID:38782842
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite evidence validating the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in youth, specifically showing persistence of BPD symptoms and morbidity similar to adults, there is reluctance to diagnose this in teens. Further, there is a belief among many trainees and academic child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) that only specialty programs are effective, leading to treatment delays. This study charts the impact of a full-day workshop offered to an entire academic CAP department.

METHODS

A Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescent (GPM-A) Borderline Personality Disorder in-person workshop was offered to department members. Participants were asked to complete a pre-survey, an immediate post-training survey, and a survey at 6 months post-training. Utilizing a Qualtrics questionnaire, both linear mixed-effect models and paired t-tests were used to estimate the immediate and sustained effects of the training.

RESULTS

Thirty-two participants completed the workshop, with 31 answering the pre-survey, 27 the post-training survey, and 23 the 6-month follow-up survey. Immediately after the training and 6 months later, participants demonstrated statistically significant (p < .05) improvements in willingness to disclose the diagnosis of BPD, a reduced negative attitude around BPD, and an enhanced sense of confidence in addressing the needs of adolescents with BPD.

CONCLUSIONS

GPM-A training can make a positive impact on groups of clinicians who work with youth who meet criteria for BPD, specifically reducing stigma, encouraging trainees and faculty members to make the diagnosis more readily, and helping them feel more competent in addressing the treatment needs of adolescents with BPD.

摘要

目的

尽管有证据表明青少年存在边缘型人格障碍(BPD),且其症状持续存在且发病率与成年人相似,但人们仍不愿对此类人群做出诊断。此外,许多受训者和儿童及青少年精神病学领域的学术专家(CAP)认为,只有专门的项目才有效,这导致了治疗的延误。本研究记录了一项针对整个学术 CAP 部门的为期一天的研讨会的影响。

方法

向部门成员提供了一场面对面的 Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescent(GPM-A)边缘型人格障碍培训课程。参与者被要求在参加培训前、培训后即刻和培训后 6 个月分别完成一份预调查、一份即时后测调查和一份 6 个月后测调查。利用 Qualtrics 问卷,我们同时使用线性混合效应模型和配对 t 检验来估计培训的即时和持续效果。

结果

共有 32 名参与者完成了研讨会,其中 31 人回答了预调查,27 人回答了即时后测调查,23 人回答了 6 个月后测调查。在培训后即刻和 6 个月后,参与者在愿意公开 BPD 诊断、减少对 BPD 的负面态度以及增强处理 BPD 青少年需求的信心方面均表现出显著的统计学改善(p < .05)。

结论

GPM-A 培训可以对与符合 BPD 诊断标准的青少年一起工作的临床医生群体产生积极影响,特别是减少了耻辱感,鼓励受训者和教师更愿意做出诊断,并帮助他们更有能力处理 BPD 青少年的治疗需求。

相似文献

1
The Impact of a One-Day Workshop on Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescent (GPM-A) Borderline Personality Disorder.为期一天的青少年边缘型人格障碍良好精神科管理(GPM-A)工作坊的影响。
Acad Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;48(4):346-350. doi: 10.1007/s40596-024-01984-w. Epub 2024 May 23.
2
Enduring Effects of One-Day Training in Good Psychiatric Management on Clinician Attitudes About Borderline Personality Disorder.一日良好精神科管理培训对临床医生关于边缘型人格障碍态度的持久影响。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018 Nov;206(11):865-869. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000893.
3
Confidence of psychiatry trainees in meeting the needs of borderline personality disorder in comparison with schizophrenia.与精神分裂症相比,精神科住院医师满足边缘型人格障碍患者需求的信心。
Australas Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;29(6):690-694. doi: 10.1177/1039856221992650. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
The Effect of Attending Good Psychiatric Management (GPM) Workshops on Attitudes Toward Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder.参加优质精神科管理(GPM)研讨会对对待边缘型人格障碍患者态度的影响。
J Pers Disord. 2016 Aug;30(4):567-76. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_206. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
5
Borderline personality disorder: attitudinal change following training.边缘型人格障碍:训练后的态度改变
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;38(7):554-9. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01409.x.
6
Effects of substance use disorder on treatment process and outcome in a ten-session psychiatric treatment for borderline personality disorder.物质使用障碍对十次疗程精神科治疗边缘型人格障碍的治疗过程和结果的影响。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Feb 26;13(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0145-6.
7
Mentalization-based treatment in groups for adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD) or subthreshold BPD versus treatment as usual (M-GAB): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于心理化的团体治疗对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)或阈下BPD青少年与常规治疗的对照研究(M-GAB):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Jul 12;17(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1431-0.
8
Training in Good Psychiatric Management for Borderline Personality Disorder in Residency: An Aide to Learning Supportive Psychotherapy for Challenging-to-Treat Patients.住院医师培训中的边缘型人格障碍良好精神科管理:为治疗困难患者学习支持性心理治疗的助手。
Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2018 Summer;46(2):181-200. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2018.46.2.181.
9
General psychiatric management for adolescents (GPM-A) with borderline personality disorder.青少年边缘型人格障碍的一般精神科管理(GPM-A)。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Feb;37:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
10
Effects of dialectical behaviour therapy-mindfulness training on emotional reactivity in borderline personality disorder: preliminary results.辩证行为疗法-正念训练对边缘型人格障碍情绪反应性的影响:初步结果。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):363-70. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1837. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Polypharmacy in the treatment of people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder: repeated cross-sectional study using New Zealand's national databases.多重用药治疗边缘型人格障碍患者:利用新西兰国家数据库的重复横断面研究
BJPsych Open. 2023 Oct 26;9(6):e200. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.592.
2
National Trends in Mental Health-Related Emergency Department Visits Among Youth, 2011-2020.2011-2020 年,青少年心理健康相关急诊就诊的全国趋势。
JAMA. 2023 May 2;329(17):1469-1477. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4809.
3
Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Self-harm and Suicidal Behavior Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
儿童和青少年自我伤害及自杀行为心理治疗的比较疗效与可接受性:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216614. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6614.
4
Mental Health Diagnoses and Seasonal Trends at a Pediatric Emergency Department and Hospital, 2015-2019.2015-2019 年,儿科急诊室和医院的心理健康诊断和季节性趋势。
Hosp Pediatr. 2021 Mar;11(3):199-206. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-000653. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Welfare consequences of early-onset Borderline Personality Disorder: a nationwide register-based case-control study.早发性边缘型人格障碍的福利后果:一项全国范围内基于登记的病例对照研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;31(2):253-260. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01683-5. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
6
General psychiatric management for adolescents (GPM-A) with borderline personality disorder.青少年边缘型人格障碍的一般精神科管理(GPM-A)。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Feb;37:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
7
Long term effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy versus enhanced usual care for adolescents with self-harming and suicidal behavior.辩证行为疗法与增强常规护理对有自残和自杀行为的青少年的长期疗效比较。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;60(10):1112-1122. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13077. Epub 2019 May 25.
8
The harmonic mean -value for combining dependent tests.合并相关检验的调和平均值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 22;116(4):1195-1200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814092116. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
9
Borderline personality disorder in adolescents: prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment strategies.青少年边缘型人格障碍:患病率、诊断及治疗策略
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018 Nov 23;9:199-210. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S156565. eCollection 2018.
10
The aetiological and psychopathological validity of borderline personality disorder in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年边缘型人格障碍的病因学和精神病理学效度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Mar;44:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 9.