• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五十年的利手研究:神经学与方法学的更新

Fifty Years of Handedness Research: A Neurological and Methodological Update.

作者信息

Giovagnoli Anna Rita, Parisi Alessandra

机构信息

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 24;14(5):418. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050418.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci14050418
PMID:38790397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11117861/
Abstract

Handedness, a complex human aspect that reflects the functional lateralization of the hemispheres, also interacts with the immune system. This study aimed to expand the knowledge of the lateralization of hand, foot, and eye activities in patients with immune-mediated (IM) or other (noIM) neurological diseases and to clarify the properties of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) in an Italian population. Three hundred thirty-four patients with IM or noIM diseases affecting the brain or spine and peripheral nervous system were interviewed about stressful events preceding the disease, subjective handedness, and familiarity for left-handedness or ambidexterity. The patients and 40 healthy subjects underwent EHI examination. In the whole group of participants, 24 items of the EHI were classified into five factors (Hand Transitive, Hand Refined, Hand Median, Foot, Eye), demonstrating good reliability and validity. Chronological age had a significant influence on hand and foot EHI factors and the laterality quotient (LQ), particularly on writing and painting. In the patient groups, EHI factors and the LQ were also predicted by age of disease onset, duration of disease, and family history of left-handedness or ambidexterity. No differences were found between patients and healthy subjects, but pencil use scored significantly lower in patients with IM diseases than in those with noIM brain diseases. These results demonstrate that the lateralization of hand and foot activities is not a fixed human aspect, but that it can change throughout life, especially for abstract and symbolic activities. Chronic neurological diseases can cause changes in handedness. This may explain why, unlike systemic immunological diseases, IM neurological diseases are not closely associated with left-handedness. In these patients, the long version of the EHI is appropriate for determining the lateralization of body activities to contextualize the neurological picture; therefore, these findings extend the Italian normative data sets.

摘要

利手是反映大脑半球功能偏侧化的一个复杂的人类特征,它也与免疫系统相互作用。本研究旨在扩展对免疫介导(IM)或其他(非IM)神经系统疾病患者手、足和眼活动偏侧化的认识,并阐明爱丁堡利手量表(EHI)在意大利人群中的特性。对334例患有影响大脑、脊柱和周围神经系统的IM或非IM疾病的患者进行了访谈,询问了疾病前的应激事件、主观利手情况以及对左利手或双利手的熟悉程度。患者和40名健康受试者接受了EHI检查。在整个参与者群体中,EHI的24个项目被分为五个因素(手部传递、手部精细动作、手部中间动作、足部、眼部),显示出良好的信度和效度。实际年龄对手部和足部EHI因素以及利手商数(LQ)有显著影响,特别是对书写和绘画方面。在患者组中,EHI因素和LQ还受到疾病发病年龄、病程以及左利手或双利手家族史的预测。患者与健康受试者之间未发现差异,但IM疾病患者使用铅笔的得分显著低于非IM脑部疾病患者。这些结果表明,手和足活动的偏侧化不是一个固定不变的人类特征,而是会在一生中发生变化,尤其是对于抽象和象征性活动。慢性神经系统疾病可导致利手改变。这可能解释了为什么与全身性免疫疾病不同,IM神经系统疾病与左利手没有密切关联。在这些患者中,EHI的长版本适合用于确定身体活动的偏侧化,以便将神经学情况背景化;因此,这些发现扩展了意大利的规范数据集。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e281/11117861/28e6ec378d4c/brainsci-14-00418-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e281/11117861/28e6ec378d4c/brainsci-14-00418-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e281/11117861/28e6ec378d4c/brainsci-14-00418-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Fifty Years of Handedness Research: A Neurological and Methodological Update.五十年的利手研究:神经学与方法学的更新
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 24;14(5):418. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050418.
2
The Italian version of Edinburgh Handedness Inventory: Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation in healthy subjects.《爱丁堡手性量表》意大利版:在健康受试者中的翻译、跨文化调适和验证。
Laterality. 2024 Mar;29(2):151-168. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2024.2315851. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Preliminary validation of the Portuguese Edinburgh Handedness Inventory in an adult sample.葡萄牙版爱丁堡利手量表在成人样本中的初步验证
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2017 May-Jun;24(3):275-287. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2017.1290636. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
4
The Pen Is Not Always Mightier: Different Ways of Measuring Handedness With the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory Yield Different Handedness Conclusions.笔未必总是更有力:使用爱丁堡手性测试工具包中的不同方法来衡量手性会得出不同的手性结论。
Percept Mot Skills. 2020 Oct;127(5):789-802. doi: 10.1177/0031512520927562. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory in a sample of Chilean undergraduates.《西班牙语版爱丁堡手性测试在智利大学生样本中的心理测量特性》
Brain Cogn. 2019 Dec;137:103618. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103618. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
The non-transparent usage and reporting of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory in functional magnetic resonance imaging literature: a survey of studies published since 2013.非透明使用和报告的爱丁堡 handedness 库存功能磁共振成像文献:调查研究发表以来 2013 年。
Laterality. 2022 Mar;27(2):221-231. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2021.1984497. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
7
On the use (and misuse?) of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.关于爱丁堡利手调查表的使用(及误用?)
Brain Cogn. 2015 Mar;94:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
8
Stress exposure, hand preference, and hand skill: A deep phenotyping approach.应激暴露、手偏好和手部技能:一种深入的表型分析方法。
Laterality. 2023 Mar-May;28(2-3):209-237. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2023.2204551. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
9
Phenotyping in clinical laterality research: a comparison of commonly used methods to determine mixed-handedness and ambidexterity.临床偏侧性研究中的表型分析:常用于确定混合利手和两手均衡的方法比较。
Laterality. 2024 May;29(3):331-349. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2024.2370871. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
10
Handedness and footedness in Korean college students.韩国大学生的用手习惯和用脚习惯
Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):268-74.

本文引用的文献

1
The Italian version of Edinburgh Handedness Inventory: Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation in healthy subjects.《爱丁堡手性量表》意大利版:在健康受试者中的翻译、跨文化调适和验证。
Laterality. 2024 Mar;29(2):151-168. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2024.2315851. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Progressive Voxel-Wise Homotopic Connectivity from childhood to adulthood: Age-related functional asymmetry in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.从儿童期到成年期的渐进性体素级同伦连接:静息态功能磁共振成像中与年龄相关的功能不对称性
Dev Psychobiol. 2023 Mar;65(2):e22366. doi: 10.1002/dev.22366.
3
Non-Right Handedness is Associated with More Time Awake After Sleep Onset and Higher Daytime Sleepiness Than Right Handedness: Objective (Actigraphic) and Subjective Data from a Large Community Sample.
与右利手相比,非右利手与睡眠开始后更多的清醒时间和更高的日间嗜睡程度相关:来自大型社区样本的客观(活动记录仪)和主观数据。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2022 May 5;14:877-890. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S358352. eCollection 2022.
4
Handedness and its genetic influences are associated with structural asymmetries of the cerebral cortex in 31,864 individuals.在 31864 个人中,利手性及其遗传影响与大脑皮层的结构不对称性有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 23;118(47). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113095118.
5
Investigating the relationship between the SNCA gene and cognitive abilities in idiopathic Parkinson's disease using machine learning.使用机器学习研究特发性帕金森病中 SNCA 基因与认知能力的关系。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 1;11(1):4917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84316-4.
6
Handedness measures for the Human Connectome Project: Implications for data analysis.利手测量在人类连接组计划中的应用:对数据分析的影响。
Laterality. 2021 Sep;26(5):584-606. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2020.1866001. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
7
Genome-wide association study identifies 48 common genetic variants associated with handedness.全基因组关联研究确定了与利手性相关的 48 个常见遗传变异。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):59-70. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00956-y. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Handedness and White Matter Networks.利手性与白质网络
Neuroscientist. 2021 Feb;27(1):88-103. doi: 10.1177/1073858420937657. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Human handedness: A meta-analysis.人类用手习惯:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Jun;146(6):481-524. doi: 10.1037/bul0000229. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
Half a century of handedness research: Myths, truths; fictions, facts; backwards, but mostly forwards.半个世纪的用手习惯研究:谬误、真相;虚构、事实;曲折前行,但大多是向前发展。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2019 May 6;3:2398212818820513. doi: 10.1177/2398212818820513. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.