Romano Pierluigi, Cano Luis, Pietrasz Daniel, Beghdadi Nassiba, Allard Marc-Antoine, Salloum Chady, Blandin Frédérique, Ciacio Oriana, Pittau Gabriella, Adam René, Azoulay Daniel, Sa Cunha Antonio, Vibert Eric, De Carlis Luciano, Vitale Alessandro, Cillo Umberto, Cherqui Daniel, Golse Nicolas
Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, AP-HP, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), Second General Surgical Unit, University of Padova, 35122 Padua, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 8;16(10):1803. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101803.
Despite the ongoing trend of increasing donor ages in liver transplantation (LT) setting, a notable gap persists in the availability of comprehensive guidelines for the utilization of organs from elderly donors. This study aimed to evaluate the viability of livers grafts from donors aged ≥85 years and report the post-LT outcomes compared with those from "ideal" donors under 40 years old.
Conducted retrospectively at a single center from 2005 to 2023, this study compared outcomes of LTs from donors aged ≥85 y/o and ≤40 y/o, with the propensity score matching to the recipient's gender, age, BMI, MELD score, redo-LT, LT indication, and cause of donor death.
A total of 76 patients received grafts from donors ≥85 y/o and were compared to 349 liver grafts from donors ≤40 y/o. Prior to PSM, the 5-year overall survival was 63% for the elderly group and 77% for the young group ( = 0.002). After PSM, the 5-year overall survival was 63% and 73% ( = 0.1). A nomogram, developed at the time of graft acceptance and including HCC features, predicted 10-year survival after LT using a graft from a donor aged ≥85.
In the context of organ scarcity, elderly donors emerge as a partial solution. Nonetheless, without proper selection, LT using very elderly donors yields inferior long-term outcomes compared to transplantation from very young donors ≤40 y/o. The resulting nomogram based on pre-transplant criteria allows for the optimization of elderly donor/recipient matching to achieve satisfactory long-term results, in addition to traditional matching methods.
尽管肝移植(LT)中供体年龄呈上升趋势,但老年供体器官利用的综合指南仍存在显著差距。本研究旨在评估85岁及以上供体肝脏移植物的可行性,并报告肝移植术后结果,与40岁以下“理想”供体的结果进行比较。
本研究于2005年至2023年在单一中心进行回顾性研究,比较了85岁及以上和40岁及以下供体肝移植的结果,并根据接受者的性别、年龄、BMI、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、再次肝移植、肝移植指征和供体死亡原因进行倾向评分匹配。
共有76例患者接受了85岁及以上供体的移植物,并与349例40岁及以下供体的肝脏移植物进行了比较。在倾向评分匹配之前,老年组的5年总生存率为63%,年轻组为77%(P = 0.002)。倾向评分匹配后,5年总生存率分别为63%和73%(P = 0.1)。在接受移植物时开发的、包括肝癌特征的列线图,预测了使用85岁及以上供体移植物进行肝移植后的10年生存率。
在器官短缺的情况下,老年供体成为部分解决方案。然而,未经适当选择,使用高龄供体进行肝移植与40岁及以下年轻供体移植相比,长期结果较差。除传统匹配方法外,基于移植前标准生成的列线图可优化老年供体/受体匹配,以获得满意的长期结果。