Skerritt John H, Tucek-Szabo Carolyn, Sutton Brett, Nolan Terry
Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Moderna Australia, 101 Collins St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 May 11;12(5):528. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050528.
mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) medicinal products can be considered a platform technology because the development process is similar for different diseases and conditions, with similar noncoding mRNA sequences and lipid nanoparticles and essentially unchanged manufacturing and analytical methods often utilised for different products. It is critical not to lose the momentum built using the platform approach during the development, regulatory approval and rollout of vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. This review proposes a set of modifications to existing regulatory requirements for mRNA products, based on a platform perspective for quality, manufacturing, preclinical, and clinical data. For the first time, we address development and potential regulatory requirements when the mRNA sequences and LNP composition vary in different products as well. In addition, we propose considerations for self-amplifying mRNA, individualised oncology mRNA products, and mRNA therapeutics. Providing a predictable development pathway for academic and commercial groups so that they can know in detail what product characterisation and data are required to develop a dossier for regulatory submission has many potential benefits. These include: reduced development and regulatory costs; faster consumer/patient access and more agile development of products in the face of pandemics; and for rare diseases where alternatives may not exist or to increase survival and the quality of life in cancer patients. Therefore, achieving consensus around platform approaches is both urgent and important. This approach with mRNA can be a template for similar platform frameworks for other therapeutics and vaccines to enable more efficient development and regulatory review.
信使核糖核酸-脂质纳米颗粒(mRNA-LNP)药物产品可被视为一种平台技术,因为不同疾病和病症的开发过程相似,具有相似的非编码mRNA序列和脂质纳米颗粒,并且不同产品通常采用基本不变的制造和分析方法。在开发、监管审批和推广针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)及其变体的疫苗过程中,至关重要的是不要失去利用该平台方法所积累的发展势头。本综述基于质量、制造、临床前和临床数据的平台视角,对mRNA产品的现有监管要求提出了一系列修改建议。我们首次探讨了不同产品中mRNA序列和LNP组成也不同时的开发及潜在监管要求。此外,我们还提出了关于自扩增mRNA、个体化肿瘤学mRNA产品和mRNA疗法的考量。为学术和商业团体提供一条可预测的开发途径,使他们能够详细了解开发用于监管申报的档案需要哪些产品特性描述和数据,这具有许多潜在益处。这些益处包括:降低开发和监管成本;在面对大流行时,加快消费者/患者获得产品的速度并使产品开发更加灵活;以及对于罕见病(可能没有替代方案)或提高癌症患者的生存率和生活质量而言。因此,就平台方法达成共识既紧迫又重要。这种mRNA方法可为其他治疗药物和疫苗的类似平台框架提供模板,以实现更高效的开发和监管审查。