School of Education, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Disability Innovation Institute, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 Jul;37(4):e13247. doi: 10.1111/jar.13247.
Self-determination is associated with lifelong positive outcomes. Students with intellectual disabilities typically have lower self-determination than their peers. Universal basic education access offers schools the opportunity to rectify this disparity. This is the first systematic review investigating the school-based practices that target self-determination development for students with intellectual disabilities.
The review follows the PRISMA guidelines, spanning five databases (ProQuest databases, EMBASE, Scopus, Sage Journals, Taylor and Francis Online) from 2006 to 2021.
Across the 18 studies, the most used practice is the SDLMI. Research focuses on United States-based transition-aged students with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities. Social validity tends to be assessed in summative and informal ways. Students are not generally involved in decision-making about practices and individualisation of support.
Self-determination development for this population can begin before puberty. Future research should critically investigate social validity and holistic integration of student self-determination learning opportunities throughout the pedagogical cycle.
自主与终身积极成果相关。智障学生的自主能力通常低于同龄人。普及基础教育为学校提供了纠正这种差距的机会。这是首次系统审查针对智障学生的自主发展的学校实践。
本综述遵循 PRISMA 指南,涵盖了 2006 年至 2021 年的五个数据库(ProQuest 数据库、EMBASE、Scopus、Sage Journals、Taylor and Francis Online)。
在 18 项研究中,最常用的实践是 SDLMI。研究重点是美国处于过渡年龄段、轻度至中度智力障碍的学生。社会有效性倾向于以总结性和非正式的方式进行评估。学生通常不参与关于实践和支持个性化的决策。
对于这一人群,自主发展可以在青春期之前开始。未来的研究应批判性地调查社会有效性和学生自主学习机会的整体融入整个教学周期。