Suppr超能文献

健康老年人以及2型糖尿病和癌症患者中内部一致性量表(ICS)的验证

Validation of the Internal Coherence Scale (ICS) in Healthy Geriatric Individuals and Patients Suffering from Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Cancer.

作者信息

Mehl Annette, Klaus Anne-Kathrin, Reif Marcus, Rodrigues Recchia Daniela, Zerm Roland, Ostermann Thomas, Brinkhaus Benno, Kröz Matthias

机构信息

Research Institute Havelhöhe, Kladower Damm 221, 14089 Berlin, Germany.

Society for Clinical Research, Hardenbergstraße 20, 10623 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 May 14;9(3):63. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9030063.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With increased life expectancy, the coexistence of functional impairment and multimorbidity can negatively impact life quality and coherence in geriatric individuals. The self-report 10-item Internal Coherence (ICS) measures how individuals cope with and make sense of disease-specific life challenges. The aim of this study was to validate the ICS in a sample of geriatric individuals.

METHODS AND PROCEDURE

In a cross-sectional study, geriatric individuals with and without chronic diseases were recruited. A factor analysis with principal component extraction (PCA) and a structural equation model (SEM) was conducted to assess the ICS factor structure in a geriatric sample. To measure convergent validity, the following scales were used: Short Health Survey (SF-12), Karnofsky Performance Index (KPI), Trait autonomic regulation (Trait aR), Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).

RESULTS

A sample of = 104 (70-96 years of age) patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 ( = 22), cancer diseases ( = 31) and healthy controls ( = 51) completed the ICS. PCA and SEM yielded the original two-factor solution: 1. Inner resilience and coherence and 2. Thermo coherence. Overall internal consistency for this cohort was satisfying (Cronbach's α with r = 0.72), and test-retest reliability was moderate ( = 0.53). ICS scores were significantly correlated to all convergent criteria ranging between = 0.22 * and 0.49 ** ( < 0.05 *; < 0.01 **).

CONCLUSION

Study results suggest that the ICS appears to be a reliable and valid tool to measure internal coherence in a geriatric cohort (70-96 years). However, moderate test-retest reliability prompts the consideration of potential age-effects that may bias the reliability for this specific cohort.

摘要

背景

随着预期寿命的增加,功能障碍和多种疾病并存会对老年人的生活质量和生活协调性产生负面影响。自我报告的10项内在协调性量表(ICS)衡量个体如何应对特定疾病的生活挑战并理解这些挑战。本研究的目的是在老年人群样本中验证ICS。

方法与步骤

在一项横断面研究中,招募了患有和未患有慢性病的老年人。进行了主成分提取的因子分析(PCA)和结构方程模型(SEM),以评估老年样本中的ICS因子结构。为了测量收敛效度,使用了以下量表:简短健康调查问卷(SF-12)、卡氏功能状态评分(KPI)、特质自主调节量表(Trait aR)、生活意义感量表(SOC)和老年抑郁量表(GDS)。

结果

104名年龄在70至96岁之间的2型糖尿病患者(n = 22)、癌症患者(n = 31)和健康对照者(n = 51)完成了ICS量表。PCA和SEM得出了最初的两因素解决方案:1. 内在恢复力和协调性;2. 热协调性。该队列的总体内部一致性令人满意(Cronbach's α为r = 0.72),重测信度中等(r = 0.53)。ICS得分与所有收敛标准显著相关,范围在r = 0.22至0.49**之间(p < 0.05;p < 0.01**)。

结论

研究结果表明,ICS似乎是测量老年队列(70 - 96岁)内在协调性的可靠有效工具。然而,中等的重测信度促使我们考虑可能使该特定队列信度产生偏差的潜在年龄效应。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Relationship between sense of coherence and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.应对效能感与糖尿病的关系:系统综述。
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Oct;25(10):3955-3967. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320202510.34312018. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
9
The relationship between sense of coherence and post-traumatic stress: a meta-analysis.连贯感与创伤后应激之间的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Jan 17;10(1):1562839. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1562839. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验