Research Institute Havelhöhe, Berlin, Germany.
Society for Clinical Research, Berlin, Germany.
Integr Cancer Ther. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1534735420935618. doi: 10.1177/1534735420935618.
Recent studies have proved the relevance of salutogenetic variables for fatigue management in breast cancer survivors with cancer-related fatigue (CRF). This comprehensive cohort design study is the first to examine the impact of 2 multimodal therapies, multimodal therapy (MT) and combined therapy (CT), compared with standard aerobic training (AT) on salutogenetic variables (self-regulation and internal coherence) and distress in breast cancer survivors with CRF. A total of 105 patients started the therapies and n = 84 completed the Self-regulation Scale, the Internal Coherence Scale, the Cancer Fatigue Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at baseline, 10 weeks after treatment (T1) and n = 81 after 6 months (T2). Patient satisfaction and qualitative feedback regarding therapy quality was assessed at T1. A general linear model including allocation type, therapy arm (MT/CT/AT), and bias-adjusting propensity scores tested the superiority of both multimodal therapies versus AT for all questionnaires at T1 and T2. MT and CT were superior to AT to improve self-regulation and patients' satisfaction at T1. Additionally, CT showed superiority for self-regulation at T2 (all < .05). Compared with AT, internal coherence was significantly higher for patients in the MT arms at T2, respectively (all < .01). Pearson's correlations between self-regulation, internal coherence, and CRF improved from baseline to T2 (Mean = -0.60). Qualitative feedback confirmed patients' benefits in several health-related categories. Self-regulation and internal coherence are manipulable variables with relevant CRF associations. They can be positively affected by multimodal therapies. Alongside patients' satisfaction and qualitative feedback they help refine treatment.
最近的研究证明了健康促进变量对于癌症相关性疲劳(CRF)乳腺癌幸存者疲劳管理的相关性。这项综合队列设计研究首次检验了两种多模式疗法(多模式疗法[MT]和联合疗法[CT])与标准有氧运动训练(AT)相比,对健康促进变量(自我调节和内在一致性)和乳腺癌幸存者 CRF 相关困扰的影响。共有 105 名患者开始接受治疗,n=84 名患者在基线、治疗 10 周后(T1)和 n=81 名患者在 6 个月后(T2)完成了自我调节量表、内在一致性量表、癌症疲劳量表和医院焦虑抑郁量表。在 T1 时评估了患者对治疗质量的满意度和定性反馈。一般线性模型包括分配类型、治疗臂(MT/CT/AT)和偏差调整倾向评分,用于测试两种多模式疗法与 AT 在 T1 和 T2 时所有问卷的优越性。MT 和 CT 优于 AT,可在 T1 时改善自我调节和患者满意度。此外,CT 在 T2 时在自我调节方面显示出优越性(均<.05)。与 AT 相比,MT 组的患者内在一致性在 T2 时明显更高,分别为(均<.01)。自我调节、内在一致性和 CRF 之间的 Pearson 相关系数从基线到 T2 均有所改善(Mean= -0.60)。定性反馈证实了患者在多个与健康相关的类别中的获益。自我调节和内在一致性是与 CRF 相关的可操作变量。它们可以通过多模式疗法得到积极影响。与患者满意度和定性反馈一起,它们有助于完善治疗。