Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Berlin, Germany.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):1-18. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02396-2. Epub 2024 May 28.
Determining the compositional structure and dimensionality of psychological constructs lies at the heart of many research questions in developmental science. Structural equation modeling (SEM) provides a versatile framework for formalizing and estimating the relationships among multiple latent constructs. While the flexibility of SEM can accommodate many complex assumptions on the underlying structure of psychological constructs, it makes a priori estimation of statistical power and required sample size challenging. This difficulty is magnified when comparing non-nested SEMs, which prevents the use of traditional likelihood-ratio tests. Sample size estimates for SEM model fit comparisons typically rely on generic rules of thumb. Such heuristics can be misleading because statistical power in SEM depends on a variety of model properties. Here, we demonstrate a Monte Carlo simulation approach for estimating a priori statistical power for model selection when comparing non-nested models in an SEM framework. We provide a step-by-step guide to this approach based on an example from our memory development research in children.
确定心理结构的组成结构和维度是发展科学中许多研究问题的核心。结构方程模型 (SEM) 为正式制定和估计多个潜在结构之间的关系提供了一个通用框架。虽然 SEM 的灵活性可以适应心理结构基础结构的许多复杂假设,但它使得对统计功效和所需样本量的先验估计具有挑战性。当比较非嵌套 SEM 时,这种困难会加剧,因为这会阻止使用传统的似然比检验。SEM 模型拟合比较的样本量估计通常依赖于通用的经验法则。这些启发式方法可能会产生误导,因为 SEM 中的统计功效取决于各种模型属性。在这里,我们展示了一种蒙特卡罗模拟方法,用于在 SEM 框架中比较非嵌套模型时,针对模型选择进行先验统计功效估计。我们根据我们在儿童记忆发展研究中的一个示例,提供了此方法的分步指南。