Moreira Mariana Melo, Carriço Marta, Capelas Manuel Luís, Pimenta Nuno, Santos Teresa, Ganhão-Arranhado Susana, Mäkitie Antti, Ravasco Paula
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing (FCSE), Lisboa, Portugal.
Champalimaud Foundation, Nutrition Service of Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal.
Front Oncol. 2024 May 14;14:1395966. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395966. eCollection 2024.
The effectiveness of the supplementation of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics as a therapeutic approach in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to critically examine the current scientific evidence on the impact of modulating the microbiota, through the use of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics, in patients diagnosed with CRC undergoing treatment, to determine the potential therapeutic use of this approach.
This systematic review was made according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the impact of pre-, pro-, or synbiotic supplementation with placebo or standard care in patients with CRC undergoing treatment. Exclusion criteria were non-human studies, non-RCTs, and studies in languages other than English or Portuguese. Six databases were consulted, namely, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Scopus, Cinahl, MedicLatina and Web of Science until May of 2023. RAYYAN software was used to manage the search results and risk of bias was assessed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration using the Rob 2.0 tool.
Twenty-four RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Administration of pre-, pro-, or synbiotics improved surgical outcomes such as the incidence of infectious and non-infectious postoperative complications, return to normal gut function, hospital length of stay, and antibiotic usage. The supplementation of these microorganisms also alleviated some symptoms from chemotherapy and radiotherapy, mainly diarrhea. Evidence on the best approach in terms of types of strains, dosage and duration of intervention is still scarce.
Pre-, pro-, and synbiotics supplementation appears to be a beneficial therapeutic approach in CRC treatment to improve surgical outcomes and to alleviate side-effects such as treatment toxicity. More RCTs with larger sample sizes and less heterogeneity are needed to confirm these potential benefits and to determine the best strains, dosage, and duration of administration in each situation.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42023413958.
补充益生元、益生菌和合生元作为治疗结直肠癌(CRC)的一种方法,其有效性仍不明确。本系统评价的目的是严格审查当前关于在接受治疗的CRC患者中,通过使用益生元、益生菌和合生元调节微生物群的影响的科学证据,以确定这种方法的潜在治疗用途。
本系统评价按照PRISMA 2020指南进行。纳入标准为随机对照试验(RCT),比较益生元、益生菌或合生元补充剂与安慰剂或标准护理对接受治疗的CRC患者的影响。排除标准为非人体研究、非RCT以及非英语或葡萄牙语的研究。截至2023年5月,查阅了六个数据库,即Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Scopus、Cinahl、MedicLatina和科学网。使用RAYYAN软件管理检索结果,并根据Cochrane协作网的指南,使用Rob 2.0工具评估偏倚风险。
24项RCT符合纳入标准并纳入本评价。补充益生元、益生菌或合生元改善了手术结局,如感染性和非感染性术后并发症的发生率、肠道功能恢复正常情况、住院时间和抗生素使用情况。补充这些微生物还减轻了化疗和放疗的一些症状,主要是腹泻。关于菌株类型、剂量和干预持续时间方面的最佳方法的证据仍然很少。
补充益生元、益生菌和合生元似乎是CRC治疗中的一种有益治疗方法,可改善手术结局并减轻治疗毒性等副作用。需要更多样本量更大且异质性更小的RCT来证实这些潜在益处,并确定每种情况下的最佳菌株、剂量和给药持续时间。