Bellelli F
Fellowship in Geriatric and Gerontology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gérontopôle de Toulouse, Institut du Vieillissement, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
JAR Life. 2024 May 22;13:60-64. doi: 10.14283/jarlife.2024.8. eCollection 2024.
Recent findings suggest that brain-stimulating activities may have beneficial effects on both Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD). However, whether cognitive interventions merely enhance cognitive reserve or truly attenuate, or even reverse, the disease's pathophysiology is still controversial. The aim of the present article is to discuss the potential for brain-stimulating activities, including cognitive stimulation (CS), cognitive rehabilitation (CR), and cognitive training (CT), to be symptomatic or disease-modifying interventions in the context of cognitive decline. While emerging evidence indicates that CT can enhance synaptic plasticity, suggesting a potential role in augmenting cognitive reserve, its impact on AD pathology remains uncertain. Small-scale studies suggest that CT and CS may slow down neurodegeneration in MCI patients and that multidomain interventions combining physical activity with CT may benefit Aβ pathology. However, the considerable heterogeneity across studies limits the comparability of findings. It underscores the necessity for a more standardized approach to cognitive interventions in future guidelines for preventing and managing cognitive decline.
最近的研究结果表明,大脑刺激活动可能对轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)都有有益影响。然而,认知干预仅仅是增强认知储备,还是真正减轻甚至逆转疾病的病理生理学,仍然存在争议。本文的目的是讨论大脑刺激活动的潜力,包括认知刺激(CS)、认知康复(CR)和认知训练(CT),在认知衰退的背景下作为对症或疾病改善干预措施的可能性。虽然新出现的证据表明CT可以增强突触可塑性,这表明其在增加认知储备方面可能发挥作用,但其对AD病理的影响仍不确定。小规模研究表明,CT和CS可能会减缓MCI患者的神经退行性变,并且将体育活动与CT相结合的多领域干预措施可能有益于Aβ病理。然而,各研究之间存在相当大的异质性,这限制了研究结果的可比性。这凸显了在未来预防和管理认知衰退的指南中,采用更标准化的认知干预方法的必要性。