Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 47000, Sungai Buloh, Malaysia.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 May 1;25(5):1745-1751. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.5.1745.
The aim of this study was to validate the AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, and Action) Model-Based Antismoking Campaign Questionnaire to be used in Malaysian population.
This study consists of mainly translation, validation, and pilot testing. The translation phase using forward and backward translation, involved three panels and three translators. The validation was a cross-sectional study conducted from May to July 2023 with a purposive sampling technique. The data was collected through e-mails among eight experts. These experts answered an online questionnaire on a four-option Likert scale, based on the four concepts of relevancy, clarity, comprehensiveness, and representativeness. The content validity index (CVI) was measured on the scale of the content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) and Universal Agreement (UA). For pilot testing, the final version was tested among 25 non-smokers and six smokers to determine its reliability using the Cronbach's alpha.
The content validity study for relevancy, clarity, comprehension, and representative S-CVI/Ave is 0.85, 0.79, 0.79, and 0.84, respectively. The CVI score of above 0.83 indicates all items are relevant and representable. The pilot testing shows high internal consistency for both samples, more than 0.85.
In summary, the adapted translated version's content validity index was satisfactory, and it can be further pilot tested among the other target population.
本研究旨在验证 AIDA(关注、兴趣、欲望和行动)模型为基础的反吸烟运动问卷,以便在马来西亚人群中使用。
本研究主要包括翻译、验证和试点测试。翻译阶段采用正向和反向翻译,涉及三个小组和三个翻译员。验证是一项在 2023 年 5 月至 7 月期间进行的横断面研究,采用目的抽样技术。数据通过八位专家之间的电子邮件收集。这些专家根据相关性、清晰度、全面性和代表性这四个概念,通过在线问卷回答四选一的李克特量表。内容效度指数(CVI)是通过内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)和普遍一致性(UA)量表进行测量的。在试点测试中,最终版本在 25 名非吸烟者和 6 名吸烟者中进行了测试,以确定其可靠性,使用克朗巴赫的阿尔法。
相关性、清晰度、理解和代表性的内容效度研究的 S-CVI/Ave 分别为 0.85、0.79、0.79 和 0.84。CVI 得分高于 0.83 表示所有项目都是相关和可代表的。试点测试表明,两个样本的内部一致性都很高,均高于 0.85。
总之,改编翻译版本的内容效度指数令人满意,可以在其他目标人群中进一步进行试点测试。