• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行业推动监管:1906年《纯净食品和药品法案》的通过。

Industry invites regulation: the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906.

作者信息

Barkan I D

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1985 Jan;75(1):18-26. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.1.18.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.75.1.18
PMID:3881052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1646146/
Abstract

Ending its 27-year stranglehold on proposals for federal pure food and drug legislation, Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act and its companion bill, the Meat Inspection Act, on June 30, 1906. An unprecedented convergence of consumer, scientific, and industrial support in 1906 prompted such action; most industries even planned for it, hoping regulation would restore the competitiveness of their products on weak foreign and domestic markets. The ways in which these interests converged, and the reasons therefore, suggest a change in their relationships to each other and with the federal government as America headed into the twentieth century.

摘要

1906年6月30日,国会结束了对联邦纯净食品和药品立法提案长达27年的压制,通过了《纯净食品和药品法》及其配套法案《肉类检验法》。1906年,消费者、科学界和工业界前所未有的共同支持促使了这一行动;大多数行业甚至为此做了规划,希望监管能恢复其产品在疲软的国内外市场上的竞争力。这些利益集团汇聚的方式及其原因,表明随着美国步入20世纪,它们彼此之间以及与联邦政府的关系发生了变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b605/1646146/b51b1ef73cd4/amjph00277-0023-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b605/1646146/1a068d50ea45/amjph00277-0023-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b605/1646146/b51b1ef73cd4/amjph00277-0023-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b605/1646146/1a068d50ea45/amjph00277-0023-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b605/1646146/b51b1ef73cd4/amjph00277-0023-b.jpg

相似文献

1
Industry invites regulation: the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906.行业推动监管:1906年《纯净食品和药品法案》的通过。
Am J Public Health. 1985 Jan;75(1):18-26. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.1.18.
2
Tragedy, transformation, and triumph: comparing the factors and forces that led to the adoption of the 1860 Adulteration Act in England and the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act in the United States.悲剧、变革与胜利:比较促使英国1860年《食品掺假法案》及美国1906年《纯净食品和药品法案》得以通过的因素与力量。
Food Drug Law J. 2014;69(2):315-42, ii-iii.
3
FDA milestones.美国食品药品监督管理局的里程碑事件。
FDA Consum. 2006 Jan-Feb;40(1):36-8.
4
From oysters to after-dinner mints: the role of the early food and drug inspector.
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1987 Jan;42(1):30-53. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/42.1.30.
5
Food and drug regulation after 75 years.
JAMA. 1981 Sep 11;246(11):1223-6.
6
Harvey W. Wiley: pioneer consumer activist.哈维·W·威利:消费者维权先驱。
FDA Consum. 2006 Jan-Feb;40(1):34-5.
7
Government regulation of the integrity of the food supply.政府对食品供应完整性的监管。
Annu Rev Nutr. 1984;4:1-20. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.04.070184.000245.
8
The Food and Drug Administration: how those regulations came to be.美国食品药品监督管理局:这些法规是如何形成的。
JAMA. 1985 Oct 18;254(15):2037-9, 2043-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.254.15.2037.
9
Ask your doctor: Justice Holmes and the marketplace of ideas.
FASEB J. 2009 Dec;23(12):4039-42. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-1201ufm.
10
The food and drug legislation of 1906.1906年的食品药品立法。
Mol Interv. 2008 Feb;8(1):4-11. doi: 10.1124/mi.8.1.2.

引用本文的文献

1
Current GMP standards for the production of vaccines and antibodies: An overview.现行疫苗和抗体生产的 GMP 标准:概述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;10:1021905. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1021905. eCollection 2022.
2
Socio-historical analysis of the social importance of pharmacovigilance.药物警戒社会重要性的社会历史分析
Front Sociol. 2022 Nov 25;7:974090. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.974090. eCollection 2022.
3
The pox of politics: Troesken's tradeoff reexamined.政治的瘟疫:重新审视特罗斯肯的权衡

本文引用的文献

1
Applied microscopy and American pork diplomacy: Charles Wardell Stiles in Germany 1898-1899.应用显微镜学与美国猪肉外交:1898 - 1899年在德国的查尔斯·沃德尔·斯泰尔斯
Isis. 1971 Spring;62 Part 1(211):4-20. doi: 10.1086/350704.
Public Choice. 2023;195(1-2):169-191. doi: 10.1007/s11127-022-01002-3. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
4
Historical Perspectives on Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Human Participants Research: Implications for Oncology Clinical Trials in Africa.人类受试者研究伦理与监管方面的历史视角:对非洲肿瘤学临床试验的启示
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jun;6:959-965. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00196.
5
Processed foods: contributions to nutrition.加工食品:对营养的贡献。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jun;99(6):1525-42. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.089284. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
6
William H. Park (1863-1939): his laboratory and his legacy.威廉·H·帕克(1863 - 1939):他的实验室与遗产。
Am J Public Health. 1985 Nov;75(11):1296-302. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.11.1296.
7
"One man's meat, another man's poison": two chapters in the history of public health.“萝卜青菜,各有所爱”:公共卫生史上的两个篇章。
Am J Public Health. 1985 Apr;75(4):338-40. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.4.338.
8
Making human junk: child labor as a health issue in the Progressive Era.制造人类垃圾:进步时代将童工视为一个健康问题。
Am J Public Health. 1992 Sep;82(9):1280-90. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.9.1280.