Menzel Viktoria, Bauer Ricarda M, Grabbert Markus, Putz Juliane, Eisenmenger Nicole, Flegar Luka, Borkowetz Angelika, Huber Johannes, Thomas Christian, Baunacke Martin
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, LMU Klinikum, Campus Großhadern, München, Deutschland.
Urologie. 2024 Jul;63(7):673-680. doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02360-0. Epub 2024 May 29.
Stress urinary incontinence in men is predominantly iatrogenic after radical prostatectomy or transurethral interventions. Current studies show that there is a deficit in the availability of surgical therapy not only in Germany. The aim of this study is to investigate in more detail the structural health care situation of surgical treatment of male stress incontinence in Germany.
The evaluation of the surgical therapy of male stress incontinence in Germany is based on the OPS (Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel-German procedural classification) codes from hospital quality reports from 2011-2019.
From 2012-2019, the number of male incontinence surgeries declined from 2191 to 1445. The number of departments performing incontinence surgeries decreased from 275 to 244. In the multivariate analysis, a high number (≥ 50) of radical prostatectomies/year (RPE/year) is an independent predictor of a high-volume centre (≥ 10 procedures/year; odds ratio [OR] 6.4 [2.3-17.6]; p < 0.001). The most significant decrease was in sling surgery (from 1091 to 410; p < 0.001). Here, the number of cases decreased especially in departments that implanted a high number of slings (≥ 10 slings/year; -69%; -62.4 ± 15.5 surgeries/year; p = 0.007). In addition, the number of departments implanting slings decreased over the investigated time period (from 34 to 10; p < 0.001). This particularly affected departments that also had a low number of RPE/year (from 9 to 0; -100%).
The situation of surgical treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in Germany shows a clear decline in sling implantation, especially in small departments. On the one hand, this reflects the increasingly differentiated indications for sling implantation. On the other hand, it raises the suspicion that a gap in care has developed, as the decline was not compensated for by other surgical therapies.
男性压力性尿失禁主要是根治性前列腺切除术后或经尿道干预后的医源性疾病。目前的研究表明,不仅在德国,手术治疗的可及性都存在不足。本研究的目的是更详细地调查德国男性压力性尿失禁手术治疗的结构医疗状况。
对德国男性压力性尿失禁手术治疗的评估基于2011 - 2019年医院质量报告中的OPS(德国手术与操作编码)代码。
2012 - 2019年,男性尿失禁手术数量从2191例降至1445例。进行尿失禁手术的科室数量从275个降至244个。在多变量分析中,每年大量(≥50例)根治性前列腺切除术(RPE/年)是高手术量中心(≥10例手术/年)的独立预测因素(比值比[OR] 6.4 [2.3 - 17.6];p < 0.001)。下降最显著的是吊带手术(从1091例降至410例;p < 0.001)。在此,病例数尤其在植入大量吊带(≥10条吊带/年)的科室中减少(-69%;-62.4 ± 15.5例手术/年;p = 0.007)。此外,在研究时间段内植入吊带的科室数量减少(从34个降至10个;p < 0.001)。这尤其影响了每年RPE数量也较少的科室(从9个降至0个;-100%)。
德国男性压力性尿失禁的手术治疗情况显示吊带植入明显减少,尤其是在小科室。一方面,这反映了吊带植入的适应证越来越细化。另一方面,这引发了对医疗差距已经出现的怀疑,因为这种下降并未被其他手术治疗所弥补。