• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年和高龄哮喘具有不同的特征:一项多中心研究的结果。

Elderly and aged asthma have different characteristics: results of a multicenter study.

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.

Division of Immunology and Allergic Diseases Ankara City Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Nov 18;54(1):309-315. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5792. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5792
PMID:38812643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11031165/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Characteristics of asthma in the elderly population is not well-known. The aim of the present study was to evaluate asthma in the elderly population, to compare disease characteristics between patients diagnosed <60 (aged asthma) and ≥60 (elderly asthma) years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional type. A questionnaire was filled out to patients 60 years of age and over, that have been followed for asthma for at least 3 months. Asthma Control Test (ACT), eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was filled out, inhaler device technique was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 399 patients were included from 17 tertiary care centers across the country. Mean age was 67.11 years and 331 (83%) were female. The age at asthma diagnosis was ≥60 in 146 (36.6%) patients. Patients diagnosed ≥60 years were older (p < 0.001), had higher education level (p < 0.001), more commonly had first-degree relative with asthma (p = 0.038), asthma related comorbidities (p = 0.009) and accompanying rhinitis/rhinosinusitis (p = 0.005), had better asthma control (p = 0.001), were using less controller medications (p = 0.014). Inhaler technique was correct in 37% of the patients with no difference in between the groups. Treatment compliance was better in elderly asthma patients (p < 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, having well-controlled asthma (odds ratio = 1.61, CI = 1.04-2.51), and high medication adherence rate (odds ratio = 2.43, CI = 1.48-4.0) were associated with being in the elderly asthma group.

CONCLUSION

The characteristics of asthma are different among patients aged 60 years and over which seems to be related to onset age of asthma. In our cohort, the elderly asthma patients had higher education level, and treatment adherence and asthma control was better. Patients diagnosed ≥60 years of age did not have more severe disease.

摘要

背景/目的:老年人哮喘的特征尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估老年人群中的哮喘,并比较<60 岁(年轻哮喘)和≥60 岁(老年哮喘)患者之间的疾病特征。

材料和方法

本研究为前瞻性、多中心、横断面研究。对至少 3 个月确诊为哮喘的 60 岁及以上患者进行问卷调查。填写哮喘控制测试(ACT)、八项Morisky 药物依从性量表(MMAS-8),评估吸入器装置技术。

结果

共纳入来自全国 17 个三级保健中心的 399 名患者。平均年龄为 67.11 岁,331 名(83%)为女性。哮喘诊断年龄≥60 岁的患者为 146 名(36.6%)。诊断年龄≥60 岁的患者年龄较大(p<0.001),受教育程度较高(p<0.001),一级亲属中哮喘患者更为常见(p=0.038),与哮喘相关的合并症(p=0.009)和伴随的鼻炎/鼻窦炎(p=0.005),哮喘控制更好(p=0.001),使用的控制药物较少(p=0.014)。37%的患者吸入器技术正确,两组之间无差异。老年哮喘患者的治疗依从性更好(p<0.001)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,哮喘控制良好(比值比=1.61,95%置信区间=1.04-2.51)和高药物依从率(比值比=2.43,95%置信区间=1.48-4.0)与老年哮喘组相关。

结论

60 岁及以上患者的哮喘特征不同,这似乎与哮喘的发病年龄有关。在我们的队列中,老年哮喘患者的受教育程度较高,治疗依从性和哮喘控制更好。诊断年龄≥60 岁的患者病情并不更严重。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7281/11031165/37dc2a640018/tjmed-54-01-0309f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7281/11031165/37dc2a640018/tjmed-54-01-0309f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7281/11031165/37dc2a640018/tjmed-54-01-0309f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Elderly and aged asthma have different characteristics: results of a multicenter study.老年和高龄哮喘具有不同的特征:一项多中心研究的结果。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Nov 18;54(1):309-315. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5792. eCollection 2024.
2
Patients' beliefs and behaviors related to treatment adherence in patients with asthma requiring maintenance treatment in Asia.亚洲地区需要维持治疗的哮喘患者与治疗依从性相关的信念和行为。
J Asthma. 2014 Aug;51(6):652-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.898772. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
3
Impact of patient satisfaction with his or her inhaler on adherence and asthma control.患者对其吸入器的满意度对依从性和哮喘控制的影响。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2018 Nov 18;39(6):437-444. doi: 10.2500/aap.2018.39.4183. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
4
Self-management behaviors in older adults with asthma: associations with health literacy.老年人哮喘的自我管理行为:与健康素养的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 May;62(5):872-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12797. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
5
Uncontrolled asthma and its risk factors in Chinese children: A cross-sectional observational study.中国儿童未控制哮喘及其危险因素:一项横断面观察性研究。
J Asthma. 2016 Sep;53(7):699-706. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2016.1144199. Epub 2016 May 17.
6
Comparison of clinical management of young and elderly asthmatics by respiratory specialists and general practitioners.呼吸专科医生和全科医生对青年及老年哮喘患者临床管理的比较。
J Asthma. 2015 Mar;52(2):162-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.928311. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
7
Uncontrolled asthma and its risk factors in adult Chinese asthma patients.成年中国哮喘患者中未控制的哮喘及其危险因素
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2016 Dec;10(6):507-517. doi: 10.1177/1753465816663978. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
Asthma control in adults in the Middle East and North Africa: Results from the ESMAA study.中东和北非地区成年人的哮喘控制情况:ESMAA 研究结果。
Respir Med. 2018 May;138:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
Structural and functional support among US older adults with asthma: cross-Sectional associations with medication adherence.美国老年哮喘患者的结构和功能支持:与药物依从性的横断面关联。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 27;9(8):e027430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027430.
10
Use of digital measurement of medication adherence and lung function to guide the management of uncontrolled asthma (INCA Sun): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised clinical trial.使用药物依从性和肺功能的数字测量来指导未控制哮喘的管理(INCA Sun):一项多中心、单盲、随机临床试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Jul;11(7):591-601. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00534-3. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing adherence to medication to improve outcomes in asthma.优化药物依从性以改善哮喘治疗效果。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2025 May 1;31(3):262-269. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001166. Epub 2025 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of socioeconomic factors and house cleaning on asthma control in women.社会经济因素和家庭清洁对女性哮喘控制的影响。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022 Mar 1;43(2):140-147. doi: 10.2500/aap.2022.43.210003.
2
Level of education and asthma control in adult-onset asthma.受教育程度与成人起病哮喘的控制水平。
J Asthma. 2022 Apr;59(4):840-849. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1871742. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
3
Asthma Across the Ages: Adults.不同年龄段的哮喘:成人
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jun;8(6):1828-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.044.
4
Higher parental education was associated with better asthma control.父母受教育程度越高,哮喘控制情况越好。
Acta Paediatr. 2019 May;108(5):920-926. doi: 10.1111/apa.14610. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
5
Asthma control and adherence in newly diagnosed young and elderly adult patients with asthma in Turkey.土耳其新诊断的青年和老年哮喘患者的哮喘控制与依从性
J Asthma. 2019 May;56(5):553-561. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1471707. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
6
Effect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes.强化血压治疗对患者报告结局的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 24;377(8):733-744. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611179.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化血压控制与标准血压控制的成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 24;377(8):745-755. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1616035.
8
[Turkish validation study of Morisky 8-item medication adherence questionnaire (MMAS-8) in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[莫里西8项药物依从性问卷(MMAS-8)在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的土耳其语验证研究]
Tuberk Toraks. 2014;62(2):101-7. doi: 10.5578/tt.7401.
9
Older adults with asthma: does age of asthma onset make a difference?老年哮喘患者:哮喘发病年龄有影响吗?
J Asthma. 2013 Oct;50(8):836-41. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.816967. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
10
Age-related differences in asthma outcomes in the United States, 1988-2006.美国 1988-2006 年哮喘结局的年龄相关差异。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Apr;110(4):240-6, 246.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Feb 4.