Suppr超能文献

社交焦虑障碍的心理治疗疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The efficacy of psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Jun;104:102881. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102881. Epub 2024 May 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the growth in research examining the effects of psychotherapy on social anxiety disorder (SAD), an up-to-date comprehensive meta-analysis in this field is needed.

METHODS

We selected studies from a database of randomized trials (RCTs) on psychotherapies for anxiety disorders (last updated search of PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane (CENTRAL): 1 January 2024) We included RCTs comparing psychotherapy to a control condition for adults with SAD and conducted random effects meta-analyses to examine the efficacy of psychotherapy compared to control conditions at post-treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-six RCTs were included with 5560 participants and 98 comparisons between psychotherapy and control groups. Psychotherapy was effective in reducing SAD symptoms, with a large effect size (g = 0.88; 95 % CI: 0.76 to 1.0; I = 74 %; 95 % CI: 69 to 79, NNT = 3.8). Effects remained robust across sensitivity analyses. However, there was evidence for significant risk of bias in the included trials. The multivariable meta-regression indicated significant differences in treatment delivery formats, type of recruitment strategy, target group, and number of sessions.

CONCLUSION

Psychotherapy is an effective treatment for SAD, with moderate to large effect sizes across all treatment types and formats. Future research is needed to determine the long-term effects.

摘要

背景

鉴于研究心理治疗对社交焦虑障碍(SAD)影响的数量不断增加,本领域需要进行最新的全面荟萃分析。

方法

我们从焦虑障碍心理治疗的随机试验数据库(最后一次更新为 PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase 和 Cochrane(CENTRAL):2024 年 1 月 1 日)中选择研究。我们纳入了比较心理治疗与 SAD 成人对照条件的 RCT,并进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以检验治疗与对照组相比在治疗后治疗的疗效。

结果

共纳入 66 项 RCT,涉及 5560 名参与者和 98 项心理治疗组与对照组的比较。心理治疗在减轻 SAD 症状方面有效,具有较大的效应量(g = 0.88;95%CI:0.76-1.0;I = 74%;95%CI:69-79,NNTH = 3.8)。敏感性分析结果仍然稳健。然而,纳入的试验存在明显的偏倚风险。多变量荟萃回归表明,治疗方式、招募策略类型、目标人群和治疗次数存在显著差异。

结论

心理治疗是 SAD 的有效治疗方法,所有治疗类型和形式的效应量均为中等至较大。未来需要研究以确定长期效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验