• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与癌症巷的环境种族主义作斗争:一种立法方法。

Battling Environmental Racism in Cancer Alley: A Legislative Approach.

机构信息

DEPAUL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, USA.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(1):196-204. doi: 10.1017/jme.2024.64. Epub 2024 May 31.

DOI:10.1017/jme.2024.64
PMID:38818607
Abstract

This Paper argues that to protect at-risk communities - and all Americans - from the deadly effects of environmental racism, Congress must pass the Environmental Justice for All Act. The Act is intended to "restore, reaffirm, and reconcile environmental justice and civil rights." It does so by restoring an individual's right to sue in federal court for discrimination based on race, ethnicity, or national origin regardless of intent under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, strengthening the National Environmental Policy Act, and providing economic incentives focused on environmental justice.

摘要

本文认为,为了保护处于危险中的社区——以及所有美国人——免受环境种族主义的致命影响,国会必须通过《所有人的环境正义法案》。该法案旨在“恢复、重申和协调环境正义和公民权利”。它通过恢复个人在联邦法院提起诉讼的权利,以根据 1964 年《民权法案》因种族、族裔或国籍而受到歧视,无论其意图如何,从而加强《国家环境政策法案》,并提供以环境正义为重点的经济激励措施。

相似文献

1
Battling Environmental Racism in Cancer Alley: A Legislative Approach.与癌症巷的环境种族主义作斗争:一种立法方法。
J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(1):196-204. doi: 10.1017/jme.2024.64. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
Black physicians and the struggle for civil rights: lessons from the Mississippi experience: part 1: the forces for and against change.黑人医生与民权斗争:密西西比州经历的教训:第一部分:变革的支持力量与反对力量
Am J Med. 2014 Oct;127(10):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.038. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
3
Dress codes and appearance policies: challenges under federal legislation, part 2: title VII of the civil rights act and gender.
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014 Jan-Mar;33(1):20-9. doi: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000440617.09020.d3.
4
Harmony between Man and His Environment: Reviewing the Trump Administration's Changes to the National Environmental Policy Act in the Context of Environmental Racism.人与自然环境的和谐:从环境种族主义的角度审视特朗普政府对《国家环境政策法案》的修改。
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(1):76-84. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.11.
5
Dress codes and appearance policies: challenges under federal legislation, part 1: title VII of the civil rights act and religion.着装规范与外貌政策:联邦立法下的挑战,第1部分:《民权法案》第七章与宗教
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2013 Oct-Dec;32(4):294-302. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e3182a9d878.
6
Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):231-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-231.
7
Reducing discrimination affecting persons with limited English proficiency: federal civil rights guidelines under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.减少对英语能力有限者的歧视:1964年《民权法案》第六章下的联邦民权准则
Public Health Rep. 2004 Jan-Feb;119(1):93-6. doi: 10.1177/003335490411900115.
8
Structural Racism: The Rules and Relations of Inequity.结构性种族主义:不公正的规则和关系。
Ethn Dis. 2021 May 20;31(Suppl 1):293-300. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.S1.293. eCollection 2021.
9
Lou Pollak: The road to Brown v. Board of Education and beyond.
Proc Am Philos Soc. 2014 Mar;158(1):31-60.
10
Genetic discrimination in the workplace.职场中的基因歧视。
J Law Med Ethics. 1998 Fall;26(3):189-97, 178. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1998.tb01419.x.