Fielding School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ethn Dis. 2021 May 20;31(Suppl 1):293-300. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.S1.293. eCollection 2021.
Why do racial inequalities endure despite numerous attempts to expand civil rights in certain sectors? A major reason for this endurance is due to lack of attention to structural racism. Although structural and institutional racism are often conflated, they are not the same. Herein, we provide an analogy of a "bucky ball" (Buckminsterfullerene) to distinguish the two concepts. Structural racism is a system of interconnected institutions that operates with a set of racialized rules that maintain White supremacy. These connections and rules allow racism to reinvent itself into new forms and persist, despite civil rights interventions directed at specific institutions. To illustrate these ideas, we provide examples from the fields of environmental justice, criminal justice, and medicine. Racial inequities in power and health will persist until we redirect our gaze away from specific institutions (and specific individuals), and instead focus on the resilient connections among institutions and their racialized rules.
尽管在某些领域为扩大民权做出了诸多努力,但种族不平等为何仍然存在?造成这种持久现象的一个主要原因是人们没有关注结构性种族主义。尽管结构性种族主义和制度性种族主义常常被混淆,但它们并不相同。在此,我们使用富勒烯(Bucky ball)的类比来区分这两个概念。结构性种族主义是一套相互关联的制度,其运作规则带有一套种族主义规则,以维护白人至上地位。这些联系和规则使种族主义能够以新的形式重新出现并持续存在,尽管民权干预措施针对的是特定机构。为了说明这些想法,我们从环境正义、刑事司法和医学领域提供了一些例子。只有当我们将目光从特定机构(和特定个人)上移开,转而关注机构之间以及其种族主义规则的持久联系时,权力和健康方面的种族不平等才会消失。