Suppr超能文献

基于卫生服务的研究对卫生服务组织的价值:一项与高级卫生服务主管的定性研究。

The value of health service-based research to health service organisations: a qualitative study with senior health service executives.

机构信息

Sydney Health Partners, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

The Sax Institute, Level 3/30C Wentworth St, Glebe, NSW, 2037, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 May 31;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01149-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research evidence has demonstrably improved health care practices and patient outcomes. However, systemic translation of evidence into practice is far from optimal. The reasons are complex, but often because research is not well aligned with health service priorities. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of senior health service executives on two issues: (1) the alignment between local research activity and the needs and priorities of their health services, and (2) the extent to which research is or can be integrated as part of usual health care practice.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior health leaders from four large health service organisations that are members of Sydney Health Partners (SHP), one of Australia's nationally accredited research translation centres committed to accelerating the translation of research findings into evidence-based health care. The interviews were conducted between November 2022 and January 2023, and were either audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim or recorded in the interviewer field notes. A thematic analysis of the interview data was conducted by two researchers, using the framework method to identify common themes.

RESULTS

Seventeen health executives were interviewed, including chief executives, directors of medical services, nursing, allied health, research, and others in executive leadership roles. Responses to issue (1) included themes on re-balancing curiosity- and priority-driven research; providing more support for research activity within health organisations; and helping health professionals and researchers discuss researchable priorities. Responses to issue (2) included identification of elements considered essential for embedding research in health care; and the need to break down silos between research and health care, as well as within health organisations.

CONCLUSIONS

Health service leaders value research but want more research that aligns with their needs and priorities. Discussions with researchers about those priorities may need some facilitation. Making research a more integrated part of health care will require strong and broad executive leadership, resources and infrastructure, and investing in capacity- and capability-building across health clinicians, managers and executive staff.

摘要

背景

研究证据已明显改善医疗实践和患者结局。然而,证据向实践的系统转化远未达到最佳状态。原因较为复杂,但往往是因为研究与卫生服务重点不够契合。本研究旨在探讨四位资深卫生服务主管在以下两个问题上的经验和观点:(1)当地研究活动与他们的卫生服务需求和重点的契合程度;(2)研究作为常规医疗实践一部分的整合程度或潜力。

方法

在这项定性研究中,对来自悉尼健康合作伙伴(SHP)四个大型卫生服务机构的高级卫生领导者进行了半结构化访谈。SHP 是澳大利亚全国认可的研究转化中心之一,致力于加速研究结果转化为基于证据的医疗保健。访谈于 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 1 月进行,要么进行录音并逐字转录,要么记录在访谈者的现场笔记中。两名研究人员使用框架方法对访谈数据进行了主题分析,以确定共同的主题。

结果

共对 17 位卫生主管进行了访谈,包括首席执行官、医疗服务、护理、联合健康、研究等部门的主任,以及其他处于领导角色的卫生专业人员。对问题 1 的回应包括重新平衡好奇心驱动和重点驱动的研究;为卫生组织内的研究活动提供更多支持;帮助卫生专业人员和研究人员讨论可研究的重点。对问题 2 的回应包括确定了将研究纳入医疗保健的要素;需要打破研究和医疗保健之间以及卫生组织内部的隔阂。

结论

卫生服务领导者重视研究,但希望有更多符合他们需求和重点的研究。与研究人员就这些重点进行讨论可能需要一些促进。使研究更成为医疗保健的一个组成部分,需要强有力和广泛的领导层、资源和基础设施,以及对卫生临床医生、管理人员和行政人员的能力建设进行投资。

相似文献

3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

3
Building capacity for implementation-the KT Challenge.提升实施能力——知识转化挑战
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jul 28;2(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00186-x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验