Suppr超能文献

弥合医疗保健领域的研究与实践差距:对英格兰和澳大利亚研究转化中心的快速回顾。

Bridging the research-practice gap in healthcare: a rapid review of research translation centres in England and Australia.

作者信息

Robinson Tracy, Bailey Cate, Morris Heather, Burns Prue, Melder Angela, Croft Charlotte, Spyridonidis Dmitrios, Bismantara Halyo, Skouteris Helen, Teede Helena

机构信息

Monash Centre for Health Research & Implementation, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.

School of Nursing, Midwifery & Indigenous Health, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, 2795, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Oct 9;18(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00621-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large-scale partnerships between universities and health services are widely seen as vehicles for bridging the evidence-practice gap and for accelerating the adoption of new evidence in healthcare. Recently, different versions of these partnerships - often called academic health science centres - have been established across the globe. Although they differ in structure and processes, all aim to improve the integration of research and education with health services. Collectively, these entities are often referred to as Research Translation Centres (RTCs) and both England and Australia have developed relatively new and funded examples of these collaborative centres.

METHODS

This paper presents findings from a rapid review of RTCs in Australia and England that aimed to identify their structures, leadership, workforce development and strategies for involving communities and service users. The review included published academic and grey literature with a customised search of the Google search engine and RTC websites.

RESULTS

RTCs are complex system-level interventions that will need to disrupt the current paradigms and silos inherent in healthcare, education and research in order to meet their aims. This will require vision, leadership, collaborations and shared learnings, alongside structures, processes and strategies to deliver impact in the face of complexity. The impact of RTCs in overcoming the deeply entrenched silos across organisations, disciplines and sectors needs to be captured at the systems, organisation and individual levels. This includes workforce capacity and public and patient involvement that are vital to understanding the evolution of RTCs. In addition, new models of leadership are needed to support the brokering and mobilisation of knowledge in complex organisations.

CONCLUSIONS

The development and funding of RTCs represents one of the most significant shifts in the health research landscape and it is imperative that we continue to explore how we can progress the integration of research and healthcare and ensure research meets stakeholder needs and is translated via the collaborations supported by these organisations. Because RTCs are a recent addition to the healthcare landscape in Australia, it is instructive to review the processes and infrastructure needed to support their implementation and applied health research in England.

摘要

背景

大学与卫生服务机构之间的大规模合作关系被广泛视为弥合证据与实践差距以及加速在医疗保健领域采用新证据的工具。最近,全球各地建立了这些合作关系的不同版本——通常称为学术健康科学中心。尽管它们在结构和流程上存在差异,但都旨在改善研究、教育与卫生服务的整合。总体而言,这些实体通常被称为研究转化中心(RTCs),英格兰和澳大利亚都已建立了相对较新且获得资金支持的此类合作中心范例。

方法

本文介绍了对澳大利亚和英格兰的研究转化中心进行快速审查的结果,旨在确定其结构、领导方式、劳动力发展以及让社区和服务使用者参与的策略。该审查包括已发表的学术文献和灰色文献,并对谷歌搜索引擎和研究转化中心网站进行了定制搜索。

结果

研究转化中心是复杂的系统层面干预措施,为实现其目标,需要打破医疗保健、教育和研究中固有的当前范式和孤立状态。这将需要愿景、领导能力、合作以及共享经验,同时还需要结构、流程和策略,以便在面对复杂性时产生影响。研究转化中心在跨越组织、学科和部门克服根深蒂固的孤立状态方面的影响,需要在系统、组织和个人层面加以体现。这包括劳动力能力以及公众和患者的参与,这对于理解研究转化中心的发展至关重要。此外,需要新的领导模式来支持在复杂组织中促成和调动知识。

结论

研究转化中心的发展和资金投入代表了卫生研究领域最重大的转变之一,我们必须继续探索如何推进研究与医疗保健的整合,并确保研究满足利益相关者的需求,并通过这些组织支持的合作得以转化。由于研究转化中心是澳大利亚医疗保健领域的新成员,回顾在英格兰支持其实施和应用卫生研究所需的流程和基础设施具有指导意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe80/7545838/4de7819a9721/12961_2020_621_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验