Department of Psychology, York University.
Hist Psychol. 2024 Aug;27(3):203-226. doi: 10.1037/hop0000259. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
The 1960s and 1970s saw the overt "politicization" of the American Psychological Association as an organization. Politics in this context carried a dual meaning referring to both political lobbying to promote the interests of psychology as a health profession and grassroots political action to advance social justice causes. In the years between the passage of the Community Mental Health Act (1963) and the Vail Conference on levels and patterns of professional training in psychology (1973), these two forms of politics were intertwined. The first significant political mobilization of professional psychologists in the postwar era occurred over the staffing of community mental health centers in the mid-1960s. These creations of the Great Society social welfare programs provided a platform for pursuing bold experiments in structural interventions to improve the lives and mental health of minoritized Americans and came to serve as hubs for the Black psychology movement of the early 1970s. This alternative model for the profession received careful consideration at the Vail Conference. However, a different relationship between politics and the profession crystalized by 1980. The politics of professionalism in psychology took the form lobby on behalf of practitioners working independent practices to receive reimbursement from third-party health insurance providers. This shift in the political economy of mental health has obscured this earlier, communitarian moment in American psychology. The racial economy of psychology's professionalization was structural, but not inevitable. It resulted from a series of historical choices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
20 世纪 60 年代和 70 年代见证了美国心理协会作为一个组织的公开“政治化”。在这种背景下,政治具有双重含义,既指为促进心理学作为一门健康专业的利益而进行的政治游说,也指为推进社会正义事业而采取的基层政治行动。在《社区精神卫生法》(1963 年)通过和《维尔会议》(1973 年)讨论专业培训水平和模式之间的这几年里,这两种形式的政治交织在一起。战后时代专业心理学家的第一次重大政治动员发生在 20 世纪 60 年代中期社区心理健康中心的人员配备上。这些大社会福利计划的产物为在结构干预方面进行大胆实验提供了平台,以改善少数族裔美国人的生活和心理健康,并成为 20 世纪 70 年代早期黑人心理学运动的中心。该专业的这一替代模式在《维尔会议》上得到了认真考虑。然而,到 1980 年,政治与专业之间的关系已经变得不同。心理学专业主义的政治形式代表了独立执业的从业者争取从第三方医疗保险提供者那里获得报销的利益。心理健康政治经济学的这种转变掩盖了美国心理学中这更早的、共同体主义的时刻。心理学专业化的种族经济是结构性的,但不是必然的。它是一系列历史选择的结果。