Suppr超能文献

动物研究:要求、责任与福利。

Research with animals: requirement, responsibility, welfare.

作者信息

Uvarov O

出版信息

Lab Anim. 1985 Jan;19(1):51-75. doi: 10.1258/002367785780890640.

Abstract

Recognition of unacceptable cruelty to animals in pasttimes such as bull-baiting, dates in Britain from the early 19th century. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals was founded in 1824. Several bills to curb cruelty were discussed in Parliament, and the Cruel and Improper Treatment of Cattle Act was passed in 1822. Other Acts have followed over the years. Cruelty in the form of painful scientific experiments, including dissection of living, conscious animals, vivisection, was proscribed by the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876. That Act required anyone wishing to experiment with animals to obtain a licence from the Secretary of State. Conditions for issue of licences were strict and remain so to this day. The Act is still valid, and is enforced by the Home Office, with its medical and veterinary Inspectors. The Cruelty to Animals Act 1876 allows experiments on animals under strictly controlled conditions. Experiments must have the clear objective of improving the welfare of man and/or animals. Benefits from experiments carried out under the Act have been enormous, covering every aspect of diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis in human and veterinary medicine. Coincidentally, the welfare of laboratory animals has also been greatly improved. There has always been some opposition to the use of animals in biomedical research. The subject is emotive but, by and large, discussion has been rational and within the law. In recent years, however, the morality of using experimental animals has been examined more closely. The possibility of replacing them by alternative methods has been investigated. Where these alternatives are applicable, they are used and further research on them continues. The questioning of animal experiments has emphasized the need to look constantly at animal welfare to ensure humane treatment of all animals, especially those restricted in a laboratory or on a farm. Attention has been drawn in this work to our existing laws protecting animals, but new legislation is being demanded, not only by some lay welfare groups but also by scientists. Hence, it has become very important to discuss various ways of ensuring animal welfare, including by legislation, especially with those knowledgeable in laboratory animal science and animal experiments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

对过去诸如斗牛等不可接受的动物残忍行为的认识,在英国可追溯到19世纪早期。防止虐待动物协会于1824年成立。议会讨论了几项遏制残忍行为的法案,1822年通过了《牛的残忍和不当对待法案》。多年来又陆续出台了其他法案。1876年的《动物保护法》禁止以痛苦的科学实验形式进行的残忍行为,包括解剖活体、有意识的动物,即活体解剖。该法案要求任何希望用动物做实验的人从国务大臣那里获得许可证。发放许可证的条件很严格,至今仍然如此。该法案仍然有效,由内政部及其医学和兽医检查员执行。1876年的《动物保护法》允许在严格控制的条件下对动物进行实验。实验必须有改善人类和/或动物福利的明确目标。根据该法案进行的实验带来了巨大益处,涵盖了人类和兽医学诊断、治疗及预防的各个方面。巧合的是,实验动物的福利也得到了极大改善。一直以来都有人反对在生物医学研究中使用动物。这个话题很容易引发情绪,但总体而言,讨论是理性且合法的。然而,近年来,使用实验动物的道德性受到了更深入的审视。人们研究了用替代方法取代它们的可能性。在适用这些替代方法的地方,就会使用它们并继续对其进行进一步研究。对动物实验的质疑凸显了持续关注动物福利以确保对所有动物,尤其是那些被限制在实验室或农场的动物进行人道对待的必要性。这项工作中提到了我们现有的保护动物的法律,但不仅一些非专业福利团体,科学家们也在要求出台新的立法。因此,讨论确保动物福利的各种方式,包括通过立法,变得非常重要,尤其是与那些在实验动物科学和动物实验方面有知识的人进行讨论。(摘要截选至400字)

相似文献

3
Animals in research.用于研究的动物。
Lancet. 1985 May 25;1(8439):1230.
5
The Animals (scientific procedures) Act 1986.1986年《动物(科学程序)法案》
Lancet. 1986 Jul 5;2(8497):32-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92571-7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验