Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 30;16(11):e0260380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260380. eCollection 2021.
Availability of safe and effective vaccines against COVID-19 is critical for controlling the pandemic, but herd immunity can only be achieved with high vaccination coverage. The present research examined psychological factors associated with intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccination and whether reluctance towards novel pandemic vaccines are similar to vaccine hesitancy captured by a hypothetical measure used in previous research.
Study 1 was administered to undergraduate students when COVID-19 was spreading exponentially (February-April 2020). Study 2 was conducted with online panel workers toward the end of the first U.S. wave (July 2020) as a pre-registered replication and extension of Study 1. In both studies, participants (total N = 1,022) rated their willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccination and to vaccinate a hypothetical child for a fictitious disease, and then responded to various psychological measures.
In both studies, vaccination intentions were positively associated with past flu vaccine uptake, self-reported vaccine knowledge, vaccine confidence, and sense of collective responsibility. Complacency (not perceiving disease as high-risk), anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs, perceived vaccine danger, and mistrust in science/scientists were negative correlates of vaccination intentions. Constraints (psychological barriers), calculation (extensive information-searching), analytical thinking, perceived disease vulnerability, self-other overlap, and conservatism were weakly associated with vaccination intentions but not consistently across both studies or vaccine types. Additionally, similar factors were associated with both real and hypothetical vaccination intentions, suggesting that conclusions from pre-COVID vaccine hesitancy research mostly generalize to the current pandemic situation.
Encouraging flu vaccine uptake, enhancing confidence in a novel vaccine, and fostering a sense of collective responsibility are particularly important as they uniquely predict COVID-19 vaccination intentions. By including both actual pandemic-related hesitancy measures and hypothetical hesitancy measures from past research in the same study, this work provides key context for the generalizability of earlier non-pandemic research.
针对 COVID-19 的安全有效疫苗的供应对于控制大流行至关重要,但群体免疫只有在高疫苗接种率的情况下才能实现。本研究调查了与接种 COVID-19 疫苗意愿相关的心理因素,以及对新型大流行疫苗的抵触是否与之前研究中使用的假设措施所捕获的疫苗犹豫相似。
研究 1 在 COVID-19 呈指数级传播期间(2020 年 2 月至 4 月)对本科生进行了测试。研究 2 在第一波美国疫情接近尾声时(2020 年 7 月)使用在线小组工作人员进行,作为对研究 1 的预先注册复制和扩展。在两项研究中,参与者(总 N=1022)对他们接受 COVID-19 疫苗接种和为虚构疾病接种假设儿童疫苗的意愿进行了评分,然后对各种心理措施做出了回应。
在两项研究中,疫苗接种意愿与过去流感疫苗接种率、自我报告的疫苗知识、疫苗信心和集体责任感呈正相关。自满(不认为疾病风险高)、反疫苗阴谋信念、感知疫苗危险以及对科学/科学家的不信任是疫苗接种意愿的负面相关因素。限制因素(心理障碍)、计算(广泛的信息搜索)、分析思维、感知疾病脆弱性、自我与他人重叠以及保守主义与疫苗接种意愿弱相关,但在两项研究或疫苗类型中并不一致。此外,类似的因素与真实和假设的疫苗接种意愿相关,这表明 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫研究的结论在很大程度上可以推广到当前的大流行情况。
鼓励流感疫苗接种、增强对新型疫苗的信心以及培养集体责任感尤为重要,因为它们是唯一预测 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿的因素。通过在同一研究中同时纳入与当前大流行相关的实际犹豫措施和过去研究中的假设犹豫措施,这项工作为早期非大流行研究的普遍性提供了关键背景。