College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Arizona, Oro Valley.
Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414686. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14686.
Military members and veterans (hereafter, veterans) with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) increasingly seek psychiatric service dogs as a complementary intervention, yet the effectiveness of service dogs is understudied.
To estimate the associations between psychiatric service dog partnership and self-reported and clinician-rated PTSD symptom severity, depression, anxiety, and psychosocial functioning after 3 months of intervention among veterans.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nonrandomized controlled trial used standardized and validated assessment instruments completed by participants and administered by blinded clinicians. Recruitment, eligibility screening, and enrollment were conducted between August 2017 and December 2019. Veterans were recruited using the database of an accredited nonprofit service dog organization with constituents throughout the US. Participants were veterans with a PTSD diagnosis; they were allocated to either the intervention group (n = 81) or control group (n = 75). Outcome assessments were performed at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up. Data analyses were completed in October 2023.
Participants allocated to the intervention group received a psychiatric service dog for PTSD, whereas those allocated to the control group remained on the waiting list based on the date of application submitted to the service dog organization. Both groups had unrestricted access to usual care.
The primary outcomes were PTSD symptom severity, depression, and anxiety after 3 months, and the secondary outcomes were psychosocial functioning, such as quality of life and social health. The self-reported PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) was used to measure symptom severity, and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) was used to assess PTSD diagnosis (score range for both instruments: 0-80, with higher scores indicating greater PTSD symptoms).
The 156 participants included in the trial had a mean (SD) age of 37.6 (8.3) years and included 117 males (75%), 17 Black or African American individuals (11%), 30 Hispanic individuals (19%), and 117 White individuals (76%). Compared with the control group, the intervention group had significantly lower PTSD symptom severity based on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 mean (SD) score (41.9 [16.9] vs 51.7 [16.1]; difference in means, -11.5 [95% CI, -16.2 to -6.6]; P < .001) and the CAPS-5 mean (SD) score (30.2 [10.2] vs 36.9 [10.2]; difference in means, -7.0 [95% CI, -10.8 to -4.5]; P < .001) at 3 months. The intervention group also had significantly lower depression scores (odds ratio [OR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.23-0.86]; difference in means, -3.3 [95% CI, -6.8 to -0.6]), anxiety (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.13-0.50]; difference in means, -4.4 [95% CI, -6.9 to -2.1]), and most areas of psychosocial functioning (eg, social isolation: OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.18-0.64]).
This nonrandomized controlled trial found that compared with usual care alone, partnership with a trained psychiatric service dog was associated with lower PTSD symptom severity and higher psychosocial functioning in veterans. Psychiatric service dogs may be an effective complementary intervention for military service-related PTSD.
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03245814.
患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的军人和退伍军人(以下简称退伍军人)越来越多地寻求精神科服务犬作为一种补充干预措施,但服务犬的效果仍在研究之中。
评估在干预 3 个月后,精神科服务犬伙伴关系与退伍军人自我报告和临床医生评定的 PTSD 症状严重程度、抑郁、焦虑和社会心理功能之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项非随机对照试验,使用参与者完成的标准化和经过验证的评估工具,并由盲法临床医生进行管理。招募、资格筛选和入组于 2017 年 8 月至 2019 年 12 月进行。退伍军人是通过一家经过认证的非营利性服务犬组织的数据库招募的,该组织在美国各地都有成员。参与者为 PTSD 诊断退伍军人;他们被分配到干预组(n=81)或对照组(n=75)。在基线和 3 个月随访时进行了结果评估。数据分析于 2023 年 10 月完成。
分配到干预组的参与者获得了一只用于 PTSD 的精神科服务犬,而分配到对照组的参与者则根据向服务犬组织提交的申请日期继续在候补名单上。两组都可以不受限制地获得常规护理。
主要结局是 3 个月后的 PTSD 症状严重程度、抑郁和焦虑,次要结局是社会健康等社会心理功能,如生活质量。自我报告的 PTSD 检查表用于诊断和统计手册,第五版(DSM-5)用于衡量症状严重程度,临床医生管理的 PTSD 量表用于评估 PTSD 诊断(两个工具的评分范围:0-80,分数越高表示 PTSD 症状越严重)。
参与试验的 156 名参与者的平均(SD)年龄为 37.6(8.3)岁,包括 117 名男性(75%)、17 名黑人或非裔美国人(11%)、30 名西班牙裔(19%)和 117 名白人(76%)。与对照组相比,干预组 PTSD 检查表的 PTSD 症状严重程度评分(平均[SD]得分,41.9[16.9]与 51.7[16.1];差值,-11.5[95%CI,-16.2 至-6.6];P<.001)和 CAPS-5 的平均(SD)得分(30.2[10.2]与 36.9[10.2];差值,-7.0[95%CI,-10.8 至-4.5];P<.001)在 3 个月时显著较低。干预组的抑郁评分(比值比[OR],0.45[95%CI,0.23-0.86];差值,-3.3[95%CI,-6.8 至-0.6])、焦虑(OR,0.25[95%CI,0.13-0.50];差值,-4.4[95%CI,-6.9 至-2.1])和大多数社会心理功能领域(例如,社会孤立:OR,0.34[95%CI,0.18-0.64])也显著较低。
这项非随机对照试验发现,与单独常规护理相比,与经过训练的精神科服务犬合作与退伍军人 PTSD 症状严重程度降低和社会心理功能改善相关。精神科服务犬可能是一种有效的军事相关 PTSD 补充干预措施。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03245814。