Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 4;19(6):e0304704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304704. eCollection 2024.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using tapered-slit membrane filter (TSF)-based chipsets for the differential diagnosis of adnexal tumors.
A total of 230 women with indeterminate adnexal tumors were prospectively enrolled. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CTC-detecting chipsets were analyzed according to postoperative pathological results and compared with those of cancer antigen (CA)-125 and imaging tests.
Eighty-one (40.3%) benign tumors, 31 (15.4%) borderline tumors, and 89 (44.3%) ovarian cancers were pathologically confirmed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CTC-detecting chipsets (75.3%, 58.0%, and 67.1%) for differentiating ovarian cancer from benign tumors were similar to CA-125 (78.7%, 53.1%, and 66.5%), but lower than CT/MRI (94.2%, 77.9%, and 86.5%). "CTC or CA125" showed increased sensitivity (91.0%) and "CTC and CA-125" revealed increased specificity (77.8%), comparable to CT/MRI. CTC detection rates in stage I/II and stage III/IV ovarian cancers were 69.6% and 81.4%, respectively. The sensitivity to detect high-grade serous (HGS) cancer from benign tumors (84.6%) was higher than that to detect non-HGS cancers (68.0%).
Although the diagnostic performance of the TSF platform to differentiate between ovarian cancer and benign tumors did not yield significant results, the combination of CTC and CA-125 showed promising potential in the diagnostic accuracy of ovarian cancer.
评估基于锥形狭缝膜滤器(TSF)芯片组的循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)用于鉴别附件肿瘤的诊断性能。
前瞻性纳入 230 例附件肿瘤性质不明的女性患者。根据术后病理结果分析CTC 检测芯片组的敏感性、特异性和准确性,并与肿瘤标志物(CA)-125 和影像学检查进行比较。
病理证实 81 例(40.3%)为良性肿瘤,31 例(15.4%)为交界性肿瘤,89 例(44.3%)为卵巢癌。CTC 检测芯片组(75.3%、58.0%和 67.1%)鉴别卵巢癌与良性肿瘤的敏感性、特异性和准确性与 CA-125(78.7%、53.1%和 66.5%)相似,但低于 CT/MRI(94.2%、77.9%和 86.5%)。“CTC 或 CA125”提高了敏感性(91.0%),“CTC 和 CA-125”提高了特异性(77.8%),与 CT/MRI 相当。Ⅰ/Ⅱ期和Ⅲ/Ⅳ期卵巢癌的 CTC 检出率分别为 69.6%和 81.4%。CTC 对鉴别高级别浆液性(HGS)癌与良性肿瘤的敏感性(84.6%)高于非 HGS 癌(68.0%)。
虽然 TSF 平台区分卵巢癌和良性肿瘤的诊断性能未产生显著结果,但 CTC 与 CA-125 联合应用在卵巢癌诊断准确性方面具有很大的潜力。