• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习识别 2 型糖尿病亚型:在 420448 名个体的电子健康记录中进行开发、内部验证、预后验证和药物负担分析。

Identifying subtypes of type 2 diabetes mellitus with machine learning: development, internal validation, prognostic validation and medication burden in linked electronic health records in 420 448 individuals.

机构信息

University College London, London, UK.

British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 Jun 4;12(3):e004191. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004191.

DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004191
PMID:38834334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11163636/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

None of the studies of type 2 diabetes (T2D) subtyping to date have used linked population-level data for incident and prevalent T2D, incorporating a diverse set of variables, explainable methods for cluster characterization, or adhered to an established framework. We aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML)-informed subtypes for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) using nationally representative data.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In population-based electronic health records (2006-2020; Clinical Practice Research Datalink) in individuals ≥18 years with incident T2D (n=420 448), we included factors (n=3787), including demography, history, examination, biomarkers and medications. Using a published framework, we identified subtypes through nine unsupervised ML methods (K-means, K-means++, K-mode, K-prototype, mini-batch, agglomerative hierarchical clustering, Birch, Gaussian mixture models, and consensus clustering). We characterized clusters using intracluster distributions and explainable artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. We evaluated subtypes for (1) internal validity (within dataset; across methods); (2) prognostic validity (prediction for 5-year all-cause mortality, hospitalization and new chronic diseases); and (3) medication burden.

RESULTS

: We identified four T2D subtypes: metabolic, early onset, late onset and cardiometabolic. : Subtypes were predicted with high accuracy (F1 score >0.98). : 5-year all-cause mortality, hospitalization, new chronic disease incidence and medication burden differed across T2D subtypes. Compared with the metabolic subtype, 5-year risks of mortality and hospitalization in incident T2D were highest in late-onset subtype (HR 1.95, 1.85-2.05 and 1.66, 1.58-1.75) and lowest in early-onset subtype (1.18, 1.11-1.27 and 0.85, 0.80-0.90). Incidence of chronic diseases was highest in late-onset subtype and lowest in early-onset subtype. : Compared with the metabolic subtype, after adjusting for age, sex, and pre-T2D medications, late-onset subtype (1.31, 1.28-1.35) and early-onset subtype (0.83, 0.81-0.85) were most and least likely, respectively, to be prescribed medications within 5 years following T2D onset.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest study using ML to date in incident T2D, we identified four distinct subtypes, with potential future implications for etiology, therapeutics, and risk prediction.

摘要

简介

迄今为止,尚无研究对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)进行亚型分类,这些研究都没有使用与发病和现患 T2D 相关的人群水平数据,也没有纳入多样化的变量、可解释的聚类特征描述方法,或遵循既定框架。我们旨在使用全国代表性数据,开发和验证基于机器学习(ML)的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)亚型。

研究设计和方法

我们对基于人群的电子健康记录(2006-2020 年;临床实践研究数据链接)中≥18 岁的新发 T2D 患者(n=420448)进行分析,这些患者纳入了 3787 个因素,包括人口统计学、病史、检查、生物标志物和药物。使用已发表的框架,我们通过九种无监督 ML 方法(K-均值、K-均值++、K-模式、K-原型、小批量、凝聚层次聚类、Birch、高斯混合模型和共识聚类)识别了亚型。我们使用聚类内分布和可解释的人工智能(AI)技术对聚类进行了特征描述。我们评估了亚型在以下方面的表现:(1)内部有效性(数据集内;跨方法);(2)预后有效性(预测 5 年全因死亡率、住院率和新发慢性病);和(3)药物负担。

结果

我们发现了四个 T2D 亚型:代谢型、早发型、晚发型和心脏代谢型。亚型的预测具有很高的准确性(F1 评分>0.98)。5 年全因死亡率、住院率、新发慢性病发生率和药物负担在 T2D 亚型之间存在差异。与代谢亚型相比,新发 T2D 患者的 5 年死亡率和住院率在晚发型亚型中最高(HR 1.95,1.85-2.05 和 1.66,1.58-1.75),在早发型亚型中最低(1.18,1.11-1.27 和 0.85,0.80-0.90)。慢性病的发生率在晚发型亚型中最高,在早发型亚型中最低。与代谢亚型相比,在调整年龄、性别和 T2D 前药物后,晚发型亚型(1.31,1.28-1.35)和早发型亚型(0.83,0.81-0.85)在 T2D 发病后 5 年内最有可能和最不可能分别接受药物治疗。

结论

在迄今为止最大的基于 ML 的新发 T2D 研究中,我们发现了四个不同的亚型,这可能对病因学、治疗学和风险预测具有潜在的未来意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b2/11163636/9f4fa9f05a66/bmjdrc-2024-004191f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b2/11163636/c38132e7d356/bmjdrc-2024-004191f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b2/11163636/076af06c3aaf/bmjdrc-2024-004191f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b2/11163636/0b6ece49c7ac/bmjdrc-2024-004191f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b2/11163636/9f4fa9f05a66/bmjdrc-2024-004191f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b2/11163636/c38132e7d356/bmjdrc-2024-004191f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b2/11163636/076af06c3aaf/bmjdrc-2024-004191f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b2/11163636/0b6ece49c7ac/bmjdrc-2024-004191f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b2/11163636/9f4fa9f05a66/bmjdrc-2024-004191f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying subtypes of type 2 diabetes mellitus with machine learning: development, internal validation, prognostic validation and medication burden in linked electronic health records in 420 448 individuals.利用机器学习识别 2 型糖尿病亚型:在 420448 名个体的电子健康记录中进行开发、内部验证、预后验证和药物负担分析。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 Jun 4;12(3):e004191. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004191.
2
Identifying subtypes of chronic kidney disease with machine learning: development, internal validation and prognostic validation using linked electronic health records in 350,067 individuals.使用机器学习识别慢性肾脏病亚型:在 350067 名个体中使用电子健康记录进行开发、内部验证和预后验证。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Mar;89:104489. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104489. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Identifying subtypes of heart failure from three electronic health record sources with machine learning: an external, prognostic, and genetic validation study.利用机器学习从三个电子健康记录来源识别心力衰竭亚型:一项外部、预后和遗传验证研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Jun;5(6):e370-e379. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00065-1.
4
Identifying and evaluating clinical subtypes of Alzheimer's disease in care electronic health records using unsupervised machine learning.利用无监督机器学习在护理电子健康记录中识别和评估阿尔茨海默病的临床亚型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 8;21(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01693-6.
5
Assessing reproducibility and utility of clustering of patients with type 2 diabetes and established CV disease (SAVOR -TIMI 53 trial).评估 2 型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者的聚类的重现性和实用性(SAVOR-TIMI 53 试验)。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 19;16(11):e0259372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259372. eCollection 2021.
6
Subtypes of Type 2 Diabetes and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Risk: UK Biobank and All of Us Cohorts.2 型糖尿病亚型与心血管疾病发病风险:英国生物库和全体研究队列。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Aug;98(8):1192-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.01.024. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
7
A machine learning model to predict therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data.一种使用电子健康记录数据预测2型糖尿病治疗惰性的机器学习模型。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Jun;47(6):1419-1433. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02259-1. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
8
Initial Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived Prognostic Test (KidneyIntelX) Integrating Biomarkers and Electronic Health Record Data To Predict Longitudinal Kidney Outcomes.基于机器学习的预后测试(KidneyIntelX)的初步验证,该测试整合了生物标志物和电子健康记录数据,以预测纵向肾脏结局。
Kidney360. 2020 Jun 30;1(8):731-739. doi: 10.34067/KID.0002252020. eCollection 2020 Aug 27.
9
Development and validation of algorithms to classify type 1 and 2 diabetes according to age at diagnosis using electronic health records.开发和验证使用电子健康记录根据诊断时的年龄对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病进行分类的算法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00921-3.
10
Association Between Type 2 Diabetes and All-Cause Hospitalization and Mortality in the UK General Heart Failure Population: Stratification by Diabetic Glycemic Control and Medication Intensification.2 型糖尿病与英国普通心力衰竭人群全因住院和死亡的相关性:按糖尿病血糖控制和药物强化分层。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Jan;6(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling the number of new cases of childhood type 1 diabetes using Poisson regression and machine learning methods; a case study in Saudi Arabia.使用泊松回归和机器学习方法对儿童1型糖尿病新发病例数进行建模;沙特阿拉伯的一个案例研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 25;20(4):e0321480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321480. eCollection 2025.
2
Milroy lecture 2024. Non-communicable versus communicable diseases: A paradigm unfit for the 21st century?2024年米尔罗伊讲座。非传染性疾病与传染性疾病:一种不适用于21世纪的范式?
Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Apr 2;25(3):100308. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100308.
3
The research progress and future directions in the pathophysiological mechanisms of type 2 diabetes mellitus from the perspective of precision medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding diabetes heterogeneity: key steps towards precision medicine in diabetes.了解糖尿病异质性:迈向糖尿病精准医学的关键步骤。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Nov;11(11):848-860. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00159-6. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
Precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.2型糖尿病的精准亚分类:一项系统综述
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Oct 5;3(1):138. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00360-3.
3
Risk factors, outcomes and healthcare utilisation in individuals with multimorbidity including heart failure, chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a national electronic health record study.
从精准医学角度看2型糖尿病病理生理机制的研究进展与未来方向
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 5;12:1555077. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1555077. eCollection 2025.
4
Intra-Individual Variations in How Insulin Sensitivity Responds to Long-Term Exercise: Predictions by Machine Learning Based on Large-Scale Serum Proteomics.胰岛素敏感性对长期运动反应的个体内差异:基于大规模血清蛋白质组学的机器学习预测
Metabolites. 2024 Jun 15;14(6):335. doi: 10.3390/metabo14060335.
患有心力衰竭、慢性肾脏病和 2 型糖尿病等多种疾病的个体的风险因素、结局和医疗保健利用情况:一项全国性电子健康记录研究。
Open Heart. 2023 Sep;10(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002332.
4
Current insights and emerging trends in early-onset type 2 diabetes.早期 2 型糖尿病的最新研究进展和新兴趋势。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Oct;11(10):768-782. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00225-5. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Identifying subtypes of chronic kidney disease with machine learning: development, internal validation and prognostic validation using linked electronic health records in 350,067 individuals.使用机器学习识别慢性肾脏病亚型:在 350067 名个体中使用电子健康记录进行开发、内部验证和预后验证。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Mar;89:104489. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104489. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
Subtypes of type 2 diabetes and their association with outcomes in Korean adults - A cluster analysis of community-based prospective cohort.2 型糖尿病亚型及其与韩国成年人结局的关系——基于社区的前瞻性队列聚类分析。
Metabolism. 2023 Apr;141:155514. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155514. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
7
A Review of Current Trends with Type 2 Diabetes Epidemiology, Aetiology, Pathogenesis, Treatments and Future Perspectives.2型糖尿病流行病学、病因学、发病机制、治疗及未来展望的当前趋势综述
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 Aug 10;14:3567-3602. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S319895. eCollection 2021.
8
Replication and cross-validation of type 2 diabetes subtypes based on clinical variables: an IMI-RHAPSODY study.基于临床变量的 2 型糖尿病亚型的复制和验证:一项 IMI-RHAPSODY 研究。
Diabetologia. 2021 Sep;64(9):1982-1989. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05490-8. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
9
Comparison between data-driven clusters and models based on clinical features to predict outcomes in type 2 diabetes: nationwide observational study.基于临床特征的与数据驱动聚类和模型比较预测 2 型糖尿病结局:全国性观察研究。
Diabetologia. 2021 Sep;64(9):1973-1981. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05485-5. Epub 2021 May 31.
10
Machine learning for subtype definition and risk prediction in heart failure, acute coronary syndromes and atrial fibrillation: systematic review of validity and clinical utility.机器学习在心衰、急性冠脉综合征和房颤的亚型定义和风险预测中的应用:有效性和临床实用性的系统评价。
BMC Med. 2021 Apr 6;19(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01940-7.