School of Wushu, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Police Command and Tactics Department, Zhejiang Police College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Jun 1;23(2):455-464. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.455. eCollection 2024 Jun.
The objective of this study was to explore the effects of a 7-week short sprint interval training (SSIT) with differing in programming volume-loads including progressive (P-SSIT) and nonprogressive (NP-SSIT) approaches on the immunoendocrine, physical fitness attributes and physiological parameters in male wrestlers during the pre-season. Thirty young freestyle wrestlers at the collegiate national-level were included in the study and were divided into three groups: P-SSIT (n = 10), NP-SSIT (n = 10), and an active control group (n = 10). The wrestlers engaged in their specific wrestling training three days weekly, while the P-SSIT and NP-SSIT groups underwent a 7-week SSIT, with scheduling in either progressed or nonprogressed volume-based overloads, three times per week. Before and after the intervention, various aspects of physical fitness (such as 20-m sprint, 4×9-m shuttle run, and maximal strength) and physiological parameters (including cardiorespiratory fitness and anaerobic power output), as well as immunoendocrine responses (such as immunoglobulin-A, testosterone, and cortisol) were measured. Following the training intervention, the control group did not show any significant changes in the variable measured; however, both the P-SSIT and NP-SSIT groups experienced significant improvements (p = 0.001) in physical fitness attributes and physiological parameters with effect sizes ranging from small to very large, and also more adaptive responses compared with control group (p < 0.05). In addition, there were no statistically significant changes observed among the P-SSIT and NP-SSIT groups in terms of immunoendocrine response to training, and physical fitness, as well as physiological parameters (p > 0.05). In conclusion, neither the progressed nor nonprogressed approaches of SSIT demonstrated superior effects on adaptations compared to one another. Therefore, it is recommended for strength and conditioning coaches in wrestling to incorporate both P-SSIT and NP-SSIT into their annual training plan, especially during the pre-season phase, to maximize the physical fitness and physiological parameters of their wrestlers while minimizing changes in immunoendocrine responses.
本研究旨在探讨 7 周短冲刺间歇训练(SSIT)对男摔跤运动员在赛前赛季的免疫内分泌、身体素质和生理参数的影响,其中包括不同编程负荷的渐进(P-SSIT)和非渐进(NP-SSIT)方法。研究纳入了 30 名大学生摔跤运动员,将其分为三组:P-SSIT 组(n=10)、NP-SSIT 组(n=10)和积极对照组(n=10)。摔跤运动员每周进行三天专项摔跤训练,而 P-SSIT 和 NP-SSIT 组则每周进行三次 7 周 SSIT,安排渐进或非渐进的基于负荷的超负荷。干预前后,测量了身体素质的各个方面(如 20 米冲刺、4×9 米折返跑和最大力量)和生理参数(包括心肺功能和无氧功率输出)以及免疫内分泌反应(如免疫球蛋白 A、睾酮和皮质醇)。经过训练干预,对照组在测量的变量中没有显示出任何显著变化;然而,P-SSIT 和 NP-SSIT 组在身体素质和生理参数方面都经历了显著的改善(p=0.001),效果大小从小到非常大,并且与对照组相比也有更适应的反应(p<0.05)。此外,P-SSIT 和 NP-SSIT 组在免疫内分泌对训练的反应、身体素质以及生理参数方面没有观察到统计学上的显著变化(p>0.05)。总之,SSIT 的渐进或非渐进方法彼此之间并没有表现出对适应的优越效果。因此,建议摔跤队的力量和体能教练将 P-SSIT 和 NP-SSIT 纳入他们的年度训练计划,特别是在赛前阶段,以最大限度地提高摔跤运动员的身体素质和生理参数,同时最小化免疫内分泌反应的变化。