Suppr超能文献

养老院至急诊护理过渡表单的采用率有限,但能改善文档记录。

Nursing Home to Emergency Care Transition Form Has Limited Uptake But Improves Documentation.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Aug;25(8):105056. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105056. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

Abstract

Critical information gaps exist in nursing home-to-emergency department (NH-ED) transfer documentation. Standardization of forms may address these gaps. In a single state, a Continuity of Care Acute Care Transfer (CoC) Form was standardized and mandated to be used for all NH-ED transfers. The objective of this study was to evaluate adoption and effectiveness of the standardized CoC form. We used a random cross-sectional sample of 2019-2022 electronic health record encounter data to determine NH-ED documentation completeness after standardized CoC form implementation. Using patient characteristic adjusted linear and logistic regressions, we examined if CoC form standardization was associated with the number of key elements present on NH-ED transfer documentation and hospital admission, respectively. We then compared documentation completeness (out of 15 key data elements) to previously published pre-implementation data (2015-2016, n = 474). Of the 203 NH-ED transfer visits after CoC standardization (2019-2022), mean patient age was 81.8 years and 41.4% had dementia. Any NH-ED transfer form was present for 80.8% (n = 164) of encounters and 28.6% (n = 58) used the standardized CoC form. In comparison with the 2015-2016 data, there was an increase in documentation for functional baseline (20% to 30%), cognitive baseline (25% to 37%), and reason for transfer (25% to 82%). Post implementation, the use of the standardized CoC form was (1) associated with 2.55 (95% CI, 1.66-3.44) more key data elements documented and (2) not associated with a decreased odds of admission [odds ratio (OR), 1.06; 95% CI, 0.54-2.05] after controlling for confounders. Implementation of a statewide standardized CoC form for NH-ED transfers improved documentation of key elements, yet significant information gaps remain. Implementation evaluation is needed to identify how to achieve greater uptake of the form and improve the quality of information exchange between NHs and EDs.

摘要

养老院到急诊部(NH-ED)转科文件存在关键信息空白。表格标准化可能会解决这些空白。在一个州,采用了一种连续性护理急性护理转科(CoC)表格,将其标准化并要求所有 NH-ED 转科使用。本研究的目的是评估标准化 CoC 表格的采用情况和效果。我们使用了 2019-2022 年电子健康记录就诊数据的随机横断面样本,以确定标准化 CoC 表格实施后 NH-ED 文档的完整性。使用患者特征调整的线性和逻辑回归,我们分别检验了 CoC 表格标准化是否与 NH-ED 转科文档中存在的关键要素数量以及住院有关。然后,我们将文档完整性(15 个关键数据要素中的)与之前发布的实施前数据(2015-2016 年,n=474)进行了比较。在 CoC 标准化后的 203 次 NH-ED 转科就诊中(2019-2022 年),患者平均年龄为 81.8 岁,41.4%有痴呆症。任何 NH-ED 转科表格都存在于 80.8%(n=164)的就诊中,28.6%(n=58)使用了标准化的 CoC 表格。与 2015-2016 年的数据相比,功能基线(20%至 30%)、认知基线(25%至 37%)和转科原因(25%至 82%)的记录有所增加。实施后,使用标准化 CoC 表格与记录的关键数据元素数量增加 2.55 个(95%置信区间,1.66-3.44)有关,并且在控制了混杂因素后,与入院几率降低无关[比值比(OR),1.06;95%置信区间,0.54-2.05]。全州范围内实施 NH-ED 转科标准化 CoC 表格提高了关键要素的文档记录,但重要信息空白仍然存在。需要进行实施评估,以确定如何提高表格的采用率,并提高 NH 和 ED 之间的信息交换质量。

相似文献

1
Nursing Home to Emergency Care Transition Form Has Limited Uptake But Improves Documentation.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Aug;25(8):105056. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105056. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Algorithm-based pain management for people with dementia in nursing homes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD013339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013339.pub2.
6
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency Department Communication in Persons Living With Dementia and Care Partners: A Scoping Review.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1313.e15-1313.e46. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.02.024.
2
Applying Geriatric Principles to Transitions of Care in the Emergency Department.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2021 May;39(2):429-442. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
The Impact of Incomplete Nursing Home Transfer Documentation on Emergency Department Care.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Aug;20(8):935-941.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
Looking through the retrospectoscope: reducing bias in emergency medicine chart review studies.
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;64(3):292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.025. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
Emergency department visits by nursing home residents in the United States.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Oct;59(10):1864-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03587.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
8
Coordinating care--a perilous journey through the health care system.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 6;358(10):1064-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr0706165.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验