Allen Foster Community Eye Health Research Centre, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye care, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Eye (Lond). 2024 Aug;38(11):2209-2215. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03155-5. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
To assess the changing trends in barriers towards accessing eye care in a rural population cohort from Southern India.
This is a population-based longitudinal cohort of participants (the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease study [APEDS]) from three rural regions of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh who were evaluated at baseline (APEDS I; 1996-2000), along with follow-ups at 10 years (APEDS II; 2009-10) and 15 years (APEDS III; 2012-2016). At follow-up, all participants 30 years and above were administered a structured questionnaire on barriers to uptake of eye care services.
Of 3810 participants, 1449 had visual impairment (VI). Among them, 1302 noticed a reduction in vision over last five years and 722 sought treatment, a significant improvement from baseline (P < 0.001). Participants were more likely to seek treatment if they were educated (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.07-1.89), had hypertension (OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.04-1.77), had VI from causes other than cataract and refractive error (OR = 2.49, 95%CI: 1.56-3.99) and were residents of Adilabad (OR = 2.21; 95%CI: 1.58-3.08) and Mahbubnagar (OR = 3.55; 95%CI: 2.48-5.08) districts. Those with moderate or worse VI were less likely to seek treatment (moderate VI: OR = 0.56; 95%CI: 0.42-0.75, severe VI: OR = 0.34; 95%CI: 0.19-0.57, blindness: OR = 0.38; 95%CI: 0.2-0.73). The most important barriers to uptake of services were, not perceiving loss of vision as a serious problem (25.9%), accepting it an aging process (21.4%) or due to economic reasons (16.0%).
Personal and economic elements accounted for considerable amounts of barriers for utilization of eye care services. The uptake of services could be improved by addressing these specific barriers and risk factors for non-compliance.
评估印度南部农村人群获得眼科保健的障碍变化趋势。
这是一项基于人群的纵向队列研究,参与者为特兰加纳和安得拉邦三个农村地区的居民(安得拉邦眼病研究 [APEDS]),他们在基线时(APEDS I;1996-2000 年)接受了评估,并在 10 年(APEDS II;2009-10 年)和 15 年(APEDS III;2012-2016 年)进行了随访。在随访时,所有 30 岁及以上的参与者都接受了关于获得眼科保健服务障碍的结构化问卷调查。
在 3810 名参与者中,有 1449 人患有视力障碍(VI)。其中,1302 人在过去五年中注意到视力下降,722 人接受了治疗,与基线相比有显著改善(P<0.001)。如果参与者受过教育(OR=1.43,95%CI:1.07-1.89)、患有高血压(OR=1.36,95%CI:1.04-1.77)、VI 由白内障和屈光不正以外的原因引起(OR=2.49,95%CI:1.56-3.99)以及居住在阿迪拉巴德(OR=2.21;95%CI:1.58-3.08)和马布巴尼(OR=3.55;95%CI:2.48-5.08)地区,则更有可能接受治疗。中度或更严重 VI 的人不太可能接受治疗(中度 VI:OR=0.56;95%CI:0.42-0.75,严重 VI:OR=0.34;95%CI:0.19-0.57,失明:OR=0.38;95%CI:0.2-0.73)。接受服务的最重要障碍是,不认为视力丧失是一个严重问题(25.9%)、将其视为衰老过程(21.4%)或由于经济原因(16.0%)。
个人和经济因素导致了相当多的眼科保健服务利用障碍。通过解决这些特定的障碍和不遵守规定的风险因素,可以提高服务的利用率。