Xu Feng, Xu Cuimei, Zhu Dan, Liu Dapeng, Lu Hanzhang, Qin Qin
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2024 Nov;92(5):2065-2073. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30166. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
Velocity selective arterial spin labeling (VSASL) quantification assumes that the labeled bolus continuously moves into the imaging voxel during the post-labeling delay (PLD). Faster blood flow could lead to a bolus duration shorter than the applied PLD of VSASL and cause underestimation of cerebral blood flow (CBF). This study aims to evaluate the performance of velocity-selective inversion (VSI) prepared arterial spin labeling (ASL) with different PLDs and pseudo-continuous ASL (PCASL) for quantification of hypercapnia-induced cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), using phase-contrast (PC) MRI as a global reference.
We compared CVR obtained by VSI-ASL with PLD of 1520 ms (VSASL-1520), 1000 ms (VSASL-1000), and 500 ms (VSASL-500), PCASL with PLD of 1800 ms (PCASL-1800), and PC MRI on eight healthy volunteers at two sessions.
Compared with PC MRI, VSASL-1520 produced significantly lower global CVR values, while PCASL-1800, VSASL-1000, and VSASL-500 yielded more consistent results. The reduced CVR in VSASL-1520 was more pronounced in carotid territories including frontal and temporal lobes than in vertebral territories such as the occipital lobe. This is largely caused by the underestimated perfusion during hypercapnia due to the reduced bolus duration being less than the PLD.
Although VSASL offers certain advantages over spatially selective ASL due to its reduced susceptibility to delayed ATT, this technique is prone to biases when the ATT is excessively short. Therefore, a short PLD should be employed for reliable perfusion and CVR quantification in populations or conditions with fast flow.
速度选择性动脉自旋标记(VSASL)定量分析假定在标记后延迟(PLD)期间,标记的团块持续进入成像体素。更快的血流可能导致团块持续时间短于VSASL应用的PLD,并导致脑血流量(CBF)低估。本研究旨在使用相位对比(PC)MRI作为整体参考,评估具有不同PLD的速度选择性反转(VSI)准备的动脉自旋标记(ASL)和伪连续ASL(PCASL)在量化高碳酸血症诱导的脑血管反应性(CVR)方面的性能。
我们比较了八名健康志愿者在两个阶段通过PLD为1520 ms的VSI-ASL(VSASL-1520)、1000 ms的VSI-ASL(VSASL-1000)和500 ms的VSI-ASL(VSASL-500)、PLD为1800 ms的PCASL(PCASL-1800)以及PC MRI获得的CVR。
与PC MRI相比,VSASL-1520产生的整体CVR值显著更低,而PCASL-1800、VSASL-1000和VSASL-500产生的结果更一致。VSASL-1520中CVR的降低在包括额叶和颞叶的颈动脉区域比在枕叶等椎动脉区域更明显。这主要是由于团块持续时间缩短至小于PLD,导致高碳酸血症期间灌注被低估。
尽管VSASL由于对延迟动脉通过时间(ATT)的敏感性降低,相对于空间选择性ASL具有一定优势,但当ATT过短时,该技术容易产生偏差。因此,在血流速度快的人群或情况下,应采用短PLD进行可靠的灌注和CVR定量分析。